Artwork characteristics and prices in the New Zealand secondary art market, 1988–2011

References

• Adler, M. (1985). Stardom and talent. American Economic Review, 75(1), 208–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agnello, R.J., & Pierce, R.K. (1996). Financial returns, price determinants, and genre effects in American art investment. Journal of Cultural Economics, 20(4), 359–383.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, C.A. (1974). Paintings as an investment. Economic Enquiry, 12(1), 13–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashenfelter, O., & Graddy, K. (2011). Sales rates and price movements in art auctions. American Economic Review, 101(3), 212–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Art Sales Digest (2013). Retrieved from http://www.aasd.com.au/
   Google Scholar
• Baumol, W.J. (1986). Unnatural value: Or art investment as a floating crap game. American Economic Review, 76(2), 10–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beggs, A., & Graddy, K. (2009). Anchoring effects: Evidence from art auctions. American Economic Review, 99(3), 1027–1039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bocart, F., & Hafner, C. (2012). Econometric analysis of volatile markets. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 56(11), 3091–3104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buelens, N., & Ginsburgh, V. (1993). Revisiting Baumol's art as a floating crap game. European Economic Review, 37(7), 1351–1371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canals-Cerda, J. (2012). The value of a good reputation online: An application to art auctions. Journal of Cultural Economics, 30(1), 67–85.
   Google Scholar
• Candela, G., Castellani, M., & Pattitoni, P. (2012). Tribal art market: Signs and signals. Journal of Cultural Economics, 36(2), 289–308.
   Google Scholar
• Candela, G., & Scorcu, A.E. (1997). A price index for art market auctions. Journal of Cultural Economics, 21(3), 175–196.
   Google Scholar
• Castellani, M., Pattitoni, P., & Scorcu, A. (2016). On the relationship between reserve prices and low estimates in art auctions. Journal of Cultural Economics, 1–12. doi:10.1007/s10824-016-9279-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanel, O., Gerard-Varet, L.A., & Ginsburgh, V. (1994). Prices and returns on paintings: An exercise on how to price the priceless. Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory, 19(1), 7–21.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, A., Scorcu, A.E., & Zanola, R. (2007). Sample selection bias and time instability of hedonic art price indexes. Quaderni, 610, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Czujack, C. (1997). Picasso paintings at auction, 1963-1994. Journal of Cultural Economics, 21(3), 229–247.
   Google Scholar
• de la Barre. M., Docclo, S., & Ginsburgh, V. (1994). Returns of impressionist, modern and contemporary European paintings 1962–1991. Annales d'Economie et de Statistique, 35, 143–181.
   Google Scholar
• De Silva, D., Pownall, R. and Wolk, L. (2012). Does the sun ‘Shine’ on art prices? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organisation, 82(1), 167–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekelund, R., Ressler, R., & Watson, J. (1998). Estimates, bias and ‘no sales’ in Latin-American art auctions, 1977–1996. Journal of Cultural Economics, 22(1), 33–42
   Google Scholar
• Ekelund, R., Ressler, R., & Watson, J. (2000). The “Death-Effect” in art prices: A demand-side exploration. Journal of Cultural Economics, 24(4), 283–300.
   Google Scholar
• Ekelund, R., Jackson, J., & Tollison, R. (2013) Are art auction estimates biased? Southern Economic Journal, 80(2), 454–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrest, N. (2014). Retrieved from http://www.artmarketblog.com/2013/06/23/why-new-zealand-is-poised-for-art-market-boom-artmarketblog-com/
   Google Scholar
• Frey, B., & Pommerehne, W. (1989). Art investment: An empirical inquiry. Southern Economic Journal, 56(2), 396–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetzmann, W.N. (1993). Accounting for taste: Art and the financial markets over three centuries. American Economic Review, 83(5), 1370–1376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gujurati, D., & Porter, D. (2009). Basic econometrics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Hazledine, T., & Vavasour, M. (2008). New Zealand. In J. Goodwin ( Ed.), The international art markets: The essential guide for collectors and investors (pp. 229–235). London: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgs, H. (2012). Australian art market prices through the global financial crisis and two earlier decades. Australian Economic Papers, 51(4), 189–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgs, H., & Forster, J. (2014). The auction market for artworks and their physical dimensions: Australia – 1986 to 2009. Journal of Cultural Economics, 38(1), 85–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgs, H., & Worthington, A.C. (2005). Financial returns and price determinants in the Australian art market, 1973–2003. The Economic Record, 81(253), 113–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locatelli Biey, M., & Zanola, R. (1999). Investment in paintings: A short-run price index. Journal of Cultural Economics, 23(3), 211–222.
   Google Scholar
• Marinelli, N., & Palomba, G. (2011). A model for pricing Italian contemporary art paintings at auction. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 51(1), 212–224.
   Google Scholar
• Mei, J., & Moses, M. (2002). Art as an investment and the underperformance of masterpieces. The American Economic Review, 92(5), 1656–1668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesando, J.E., & Shum, P.M. (2008). The auction market for modern prints: Confirmations, contradictions and new puzzles. Economic Inquiry, 46(2), 149–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesando, J.E., & Shum, P.M. (1999). The returns to Picasso's prints and to traditional financial assets, 1977 to 1996. Journal of Cultural Economics, 23(3), 183–192.
   Google Scholar
• Platts, U. (1979) Nineteenth century New Zealand artists: A guide & handbook, avon fine prints, Christchurch, New Zealand. Retrieved from http://christchurchcitylibraries.com/Heritage/Publications/Art/Platts-19thC/Platts-19thCArtists.pdf;| NZETC (New Zealand Electronic Text Collection) Victoria University of Wellington.
   Google Scholar
• Renneboog, L., & Spaenjers, C. (2013). Buying beauty: On prices and returns in the art market. Management Science, 59(1), 36–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renneboog, L., & Spaenjers, C. (2011). The iconic boom in modern Russian art. Journal of Alternative Investments, 13(1), 67–80.
   Google Scholar
• Renneboog, L., & Van Houtte, T. (2002). The monetary appreciation of paintings: From realism to Magritte. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 26(3), 331–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, S. (1980). The economics of superstars. American Economic Review, 71(5), 845–858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartori, A.E. (2003). An estimator for some binary-outcome selection models without exclusion restrictions. Political Analysis, 11(2), 111–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, J.P. (1977). The monetary appreciation of paintings. Journal of Political Economy, 85(5), 1021–1036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Te Ara Encyclopedia of New Zealand (2014). Retrieved from www.teara.govt.nz/en/biographies
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, J., (2010) Selection bias and econometric remedies in accounting and finance research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 29(1), 31–57.
   Google Scholar
• Ursprung, H.W., & Wiermann, C. (2010). Reputation, price, and death: An empirical analysis of art price formation. Economic Inquiry, 49(3), 697–715.
   Google Scholar
• White, H. (1980). A heteroscedastistic consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroscedasticity. Econometrica, 48(4), 817–838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worthington, A.C. & Higgs, H. (2004). Art as an investment: Risk, return and portfolio diversification in major painting markets. Accounting and Finance, 44(2), 257–272.
   Google Scholar
• Zanola, R. (2007). The dynamics of art prices: The selection corrected repeat-sales index. Working Paper, No. 85. Italy: Department of Public Policy and Public Choice, University of Eastern Piedmont.
   Google Scholar