References
- Acemoglu, D., Kremer, M., & Mian, A. (2007). Incentives in markets, firms and governments. Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 24, 273–306.
- Ahlbrandt, R.S. Jr. (1973). Efficiency in the provision of fire services. Public Choice, 16, 1–15.
- Atkinson, S.E., & Halvorsen, R. (1986). The relative efficiency of public and private firms in a regulated environment: The case of U.S. electric utilities. Journal of Public Economics, 29, 281–294.
- Barry, P. (2011). Partial privatisation to kick-off in New Zealand. Privatization Barometer. Retrieved from http://www.tdb.co.nz/documents/reports/300712-Partial-Privatization-to-Kick-Off-in-NZ.pdf
- Besley, T., & Ghatak, M. (2001). Government versus private ownership of public goods. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 1343–1372.
- Besley, T., & Ghatak, M. (2003). Incentives, choice and accountability in the provision of public services. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19, 235–249.
- Besley, T., & Ghatak, M. (2005). Competition and incentives with motivated agents. American Economic Review, 95, 616–636.
- Boardman, A.E., & Vining, A.R. (1989). Ownership and performance in competitive environments: A comparison of the performance of private, mixed, and state-owned enterprises. Journal of Law and Economics, 32, 1–33.
- Boubakri, N., & Cosset, J. (1998). The financial and operating performance of newly-privatized firms: Evidence from developing countries. Journal of Finance, 53, 1081–1110.
- Boycko, M., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R.W. (1996). A theory of privatization. Economic Journal, 106, 309–319.
- Bradbury, M.E. (1999). Government ownership and financial performance in a competitive environment: Evidence from the corporatisation of the New Zealand Government computing services. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 16, 157–172.
- Bradbury, M.E., & Hooks, J.J. (2008). Ownership and performance in a lightly regulated non-competitive operating environment. Paper presented at Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand (AFAANZ)/International Association for Accounting Education and Research (IAAER) 2008 conference, Sydney, Australia.
- Caves, D.W., & Christensen, L.R. (1980). The relative efficiency of public and private firms in a competitive environment: The case of Canadian railroads. Journal of Political Economy, 88, 958–976.
- Clarkson, K.W. (1972). Some implications of property rights in hospital management. Journal of Law and Economics, 15, 363–384.
- Crown Ownership Monitoring Unit (2012). 2012 Annual portfolio report. Retrieved from http://www.comu.govt.nz/publications/annual-portfolio-report
- Davies, D.G. (1971). The efficiency of public versus private firms: The case of Australia's two airlines. Journal of Law and Economics, 14, 149–165.
- Dewenter, K.L., & Malatesta, P.H. (2001). State-owned and privately-owned firms: An empirical analysis of profitability, leverage, and labour intensity. American Economic Review, 91, 320–334.
- Dixit, D. (2002). Incentives and organizations in the public sector. Journal of Human Resources, 37, 696–727.
- D'Souza, J., & Megginson, W. (1999). The financial and operating performance of privatised firms during the 1990s. Journal of Finance, 54, 1397–1438.
- Ehrlich, I., Gallais-Hamonno, G., Liu, Z., & Lutter, R. (1994). Productivity growth and firm ownership: An empirical investigation. Journal of Political Economy, 102, 1006–1038.
- Ejelly, A.M.A. (2009). Ownership and firm performance: The experience of Saudi Arabia's emerging economy. International Business and Economics Research Journal, 8, 25–34.
- Frech, H.E. III. (1976). The property rights theory of the firm: Empirical results from a natural experiment. Journal of Political Economy, 84, 143–152.
- Hart, O., Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. (1997). The proper scope of government: Theory and an application to prisons. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 1127–1161.
- Kelsey, J. (1995). The New Zealand experiment: A world model for structural adjustment? Auckland: Auckland University Press.
- Kole, S.R., & Mulherin, J.H. (1997). The government as a shareholder: A case from the United States. Journal of Law and Economics, 40, 1–22.
- Kwoka, J.E. (2005). The comparative advantage of public ownership: Evidence from U.S. electric utilities. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 38, 622–640.
- Lau, Y.W., & Tong, C.Q. (2008). Are Malaysian government-linked companies (GLCs) creating value? International Applied Economics and Management Letters, 1, 9–12.
- Majumdar, S.K. (1996). Assessing comparative efficiency of the state-owned, mixed, and private sectors in Indian industry. Public Choice, 96, 1–24.
- Martin, S., & Parker, D. (1995). Privatization and economic performance throughout the UK business cycle. Managerial and Decision Economics, 16, 225–237.
- Megginson, W.L., Nahes, R.C., & van Randenborgh, M. (1994). The financial and operating performance of newly privatised firms: An international empirical analysis. Journal of Finance, 49, 403–452.
- Megginson, W.L., & Netter, J.M. (2001). From state to market: A survey of empirical studies on privatization. Journal of Economic Literature, 39, 321–389.
- Nahadi, B., & Suzuki, Y. (2012). Partial privatisation and performance of privatised SOEs: The evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 3, 98–109.
- NZX (2012). NZX Limited – Monthly Shareholder Metrics December 2012. Retrieved from https://www.nzx.com/files/attachments/169385.pdf
- Omran, M. (2001). Performance consequences of privatizing Egyptian state-owned enterprises: The effect of post-privatization ownership structure on firm performance (Working Paper). Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=281866
- Palmer, G. (1987). Unbridled power: An interpretation of New Zealand's constitution and government (2nd ed.). Auckland: Oxford University Press.
- Peltzman, S. (1971). Pricing in public and private enterprises: Electric utilities in the United States. Journal of Law and Economics, 14, 109–147.
- Picot, A., & Kaulmann, T. (1989). Comparative performance of government-owned and privately-owned industrial corporations: Empirical results from six countries. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 145, 298–316.
- Savas, E.S. (1977). Policy analysis for local government: Public vs. private refuse collection. Policy Analysis, 3, 49–74.
- Scott, G., Bushnall, P., & Sallee, N. (1990). Reform of the core public sector: New Zealand experience. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 3, 138–167.
- Shapiro, C., & Willig, R. (1993). Economic rationales for the scope of privatization. In E. Suleiman & J. Waterbury (Eds.), The political economy of private sector reform and privatization. San Francisco, CA: Westview.
- Spicer, B., Bowman, R., Emanuel, D., & Hunt, A. (1991). The power to manage, restructuring the New Zealand Electricity Department as a state-owned enterprise: The ElectriCorp experience. Auckland: Oxford University Press.
- Sun, Q., Tong, W.H.S., & Tong, J. (2002). How does government ownership affect firm performance? Evidence from China's privatisation experience. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 29, 1–27.
- Vining, A. R., & Boardman, A. E. (1992). Ownership versus competition: Efficiency in public enterprise, Public Choice, 73, 205--239.
- Wong, N. (1992). A comparison of the performance of private, mixed and state-owned enterprises in New Zealand (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Auckland.
- Zeckhauser, R.J., & Horn, M. (1989). The control and performance of state-owned enterprises. In P. MacAvoy, W, Stanbury, G. Yarrow, & R. Zeckhauser (Eds.), Privatisation and state-owned enterprises, lessons from the United States, Great Britain and Canada (Rochester studies in managerial economics and policy) (pp. 7–57). Norwell: Kluwer Academic.