405
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

New Zealand State-owned enterprises: is state-ownership detrimental to firm performance?

, &
Pages 170-184 | Received 23 Sep 2015, Accepted 12 Dec 2016, Published online: 05 Jan 2017

References

  • Acemoglu, D., Kremer, M., & Mian, A. (2007). Incentives in markets, firms and governments. Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 24, 273–306.
  • Ahlbrandt, R.S. Jr. (1973). Efficiency in the provision of fire services. Public Choice, 16, 1–15.
  • Atkinson, S.E., & Halvorsen, R. (1986). The relative efficiency of public and private firms in a regulated environment: The case of U.S. electric utilities. Journal of Public Economics, 29, 281–294.
  • Barry, P. (2011). Partial privatisation to kick-off in New Zealand. Privatization Barometer. Retrieved from http://www.tdb.co.nz/documents/reports/300712-Partial-Privatization-to-Kick-Off-in-NZ.pdf
  • Besley, T., & Ghatak, M. (2001). Government versus private ownership of public goods. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 1343–1372.
  • Besley, T., & Ghatak, M. (2003). Incentives, choice and accountability in the provision of public services. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 19, 235–249.
  • Besley, T., & Ghatak, M. (2005). Competition and incentives with motivated agents. American Economic Review, 95, 616–636.
  • Boardman, A.E., & Vining, A.R. (1989). Ownership and performance in competitive environments: A comparison of the performance of private, mixed, and state-owned enterprises. Journal of Law and Economics, 32, 1–33.
  • Boubakri, N., & Cosset, J. (1998). The financial and operating performance of newly-privatized firms: Evidence from developing countries. Journal of Finance, 53, 1081–1110.
  • Boycko, M., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R.W. (1996). A theory of privatization. Economic Journal, 106, 309–319.
  • Bradbury, M.E. (1999). Government ownership and financial performance in a competitive environment: Evidence from the corporatisation of the New Zealand Government computing services. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 16, 157–172.
  • Bradbury, M.E., & Hooks, J.J. (2008). Ownership and performance in a lightly regulated non-competitive operating environment. Paper presented at Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand (AFAANZ)/International Association for Accounting Education and Research (IAAER) 2008 conference, Sydney, Australia.
  • Caves, D.W., & Christensen, L.R. (1980). The relative efficiency of public and private firms in a competitive environment: The case of Canadian railroads. Journal of Political Economy, 88, 958–976.
  • Clarkson, K.W. (1972). Some implications of property rights in hospital management. Journal of Law and Economics, 15, 363–384.
  • Crown Ownership Monitoring Unit (2012). 2012 Annual portfolio report. Retrieved from http://www.comu.govt.nz/publications/annual-portfolio-report
  • Davies, D.G. (1971). The efficiency of public versus private firms: The case of Australia's two airlines. Journal of Law and Economics, 14, 149–165.
  • Dewenter, K.L., & Malatesta, P.H. (2001). State-owned and privately-owned firms: An empirical analysis of profitability, leverage, and labour intensity. American Economic Review, 91, 320–334.
  • Dixit, D. (2002). Incentives and organizations in the public sector. Journal of Human Resources, 37, 696–727.
  • D'Souza, J., & Megginson, W. (1999). The financial and operating performance of privatised firms during the 1990s. Journal of Finance, 54, 1397–1438.
  • Ehrlich, I., Gallais-Hamonno, G., Liu, Z., & Lutter, R. (1994). Productivity growth and firm ownership: An empirical investigation. Journal of Political Economy, 102, 1006–1038.
  • Ejelly, A.M.A. (2009). Ownership and firm performance: The experience of Saudi Arabia's emerging economy. International Business and Economics Research Journal, 8, 25–34.
  • Frech, H.E. III. (1976). The property rights theory of the firm: Empirical results from a natural experiment. Journal of Political Economy, 84, 143–152.
  • Hart, O., Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. (1997). The proper scope of government: Theory and an application to prisons. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 1127–1161.
  • Kelsey, J. (1995). The New Zealand experiment: A world model for structural adjustment? Auckland: Auckland University Press.
  • Kole, S.R., & Mulherin, J.H. (1997). The government as a shareholder: A case from the United States. Journal of Law and Economics, 40, 1–22.
  • Kwoka, J.E. (2005). The comparative advantage of public ownership: Evidence from U.S. electric utilities. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 38, 622–640.
  • Lau, Y.W., & Tong, C.Q. (2008). Are Malaysian government-linked companies (GLCs) creating value? International Applied Economics and Management Letters, 1, 9–12.
  • Majumdar, S.K. (1996). Assessing comparative efficiency of the state-owned, mixed, and private sectors in Indian industry. Public Choice, 96, 1–24.
  • Martin, S., & Parker, D. (1995). Privatization and economic performance throughout the UK business cycle. Managerial and Decision Economics, 16, 225–237.
  • Megginson, W.L., Nahes, R.C., & van Randenborgh, M. (1994). The financial and operating performance of newly privatised firms: An international empirical analysis. Journal of Finance, 49, 403–452.
  • Megginson, W.L., & Netter, J.M. (2001). From state to market: A survey of empirical studies on privatization. Journal of Economic Literature, 39, 321–389.
  • Nahadi, B., & Suzuki, Y. (2012). Partial privatisation and performance of privatised SOEs: The evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 3, 98–109.
  • NZX (2012). NZX Limited – Monthly Shareholder Metrics December 2012. Retrieved from https://www.nzx.com/files/attachments/169385.pdf
  • Omran, M. (2001). Performance consequences of privatizing Egyptian state-owned enterprises: The effect of post-privatization ownership structure on firm performance (Working Paper). Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=281866
  • Palmer, G. (1987). Unbridled power: An interpretation of New Zealand's constitution and government (2nd ed.). Auckland: Oxford University Press.
  • Peltzman, S. (1971). Pricing in public and private enterprises: Electric utilities in the United States. Journal of Law and Economics, 14, 109–147.
  • Picot, A., & Kaulmann, T. (1989). Comparative performance of government-owned and privately-owned industrial corporations: Empirical results from six countries. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 145, 298–316.
  • Savas, E.S. (1977). Policy analysis for local government: Public vs. private refuse collection. Policy Analysis, 3, 49–74.
  • Scott, G., Bushnall, P., & Sallee, N. (1990). Reform of the core public sector: New Zealand experience. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 3, 138–167.
  • Shapiro, C., & Willig, R. (1993). Economic rationales for the scope of privatization. In E. Suleiman & J. Waterbury (Eds.), The political economy of private sector reform and privatization. San Francisco, CA: Westview.
  • Spicer, B., Bowman, R., Emanuel, D., & Hunt, A. (1991). The power to manage, restructuring the New Zealand Electricity Department as a state-owned enterprise: The ElectriCorp experience. Auckland: Oxford University Press.
  • Sun, Q., Tong, W.H.S., & Tong, J. (2002). How does government ownership affect firm performance? Evidence from China's privatisation experience. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 29, 1–27.
  • Vining, A. R., & Boardman, A. E. (1992). Ownership versus competition: Efficiency in public enterprise, Public Choice, 73, 205--239.
  • Wong, N. (1992). A comparison of the performance of private, mixed and state-owned enterprises in New Zealand (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Auckland.
  • Zeckhauser, R.J., & Horn, M. (1989). The control and performance of state-owned enterprises. In P. MacAvoy, W, Stanbury, G. Yarrow, & R. Zeckhauser (Eds.), Privatisation and state-owned enterprises, lessons from the United States, Great Britain and Canada (Rochester studies in managerial economics and policy) (pp. 7–57). Norwell: Kluwer Academic.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.