Realising the promises of agricultural big data through a Māori Data Sovereignty approach

References

• Bronson, K. (2018). Smart farming: Including rights holders for responsible agricultural innovation. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(2), 7–14. doi:10.22215/timreview/1135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronson, K. (2019). Looking through a responsible innovation lens at uneven engagements with digital farming. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 90–91(April), 100294. doi:10.1016/j.njas.2019.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronson, K. (2022). The immaculate conception of data: Agribusiness, activists and their shared politics of the future. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bronson, K., & Sengers, P. (2022). Big tech meets big Ag: Diversifying epistemologies of data and power. Science as Culture, 31(1), 15–28. doi:10.1080/09505431.2021.1986692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burch, K., & Legun, K. (2021). Overcoming barriers to including agricultural workers in the co-design of new AgTech: Lessons from a COVID-19-present world. Culture, Agriculture, Food and Environment, 43(2), 147–160. doi:10.1111/cuag.12277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burch, K., Nafus, D., Legun, K., & Klerkx, L. (2022). Intellectual property meets transdisciplinary co-design: Prioritizing responsiveness in the production of new AgTech through located response-ability. Agriculture and Human Values. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-022-10378-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burch, K., Nepia, M., Jones, N., Muru-Lanning, M., Williams, H., & O’Connor, M. (2022). Robots in the workplace: Behind the digital interface / Ngā karehiko kei te wāhi mahi: Kei muri i te tāhono matihiko. In A. Pendergrast, & K. Pendergrast (Eds.), More zeroes and ones: Digital technology and equity in Aotearoa New Zealand (pp. 64–85). Wellington: Bridget Williams Books.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H. (2020). Farming inside invisible worlds: Modernist agriculture and its consequences. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Carolan, M. (2018). ‘Smart’ farming techniques as political ontology: Access, sovereignty and the performance of neoliberal and not-so-neoliberal worlds. Sociologia Ruralis, 58(4), 745–764. doi:10.1111/soru.12202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carolan, M. (2022). Digitization as politics: Smart farming through the lens of weak and strong data. Journal of Rural Studies, 91(May 2020), 208–216. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.10.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charters, C., Kingdon-Bebb, K., Olsen, T., Ormsby, W., Owen, E., Pryor, J., … Williams, G. (2019). He Puapua. https://iwichairs.maori.nz/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/He-Puapua-for-OIA-release.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ditzler, L., & Driessen, C. (2022). Automating agroecology: How to design a farming robot without a monocultural mindset? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 35(1). Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/s10806-021-09876-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, E., Glaros, A., Ross, D. Z., & Nost, E. (2021). New but for whom? Discourses of innovation in precision agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values, 38(4), 1181–1199. doi:10.1007/s10460-021-10244-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairbairn, M., & Kish, Z.. (2022). A poverty of data? Exporting the digital revolution to farmers in the Global South. In J. Goldstein E. Nost (Ed.), The Nature of Data: Infrastructures, Environments, Politics (pp. 211-229). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, A. (2019). Land grab/data grab: Precision agriculture and its new horizons. Journal of Peasant Studies, 46(5), 893–912. doi:10.1080/03066150.2017.1415887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Indigenous Data Alliance (GIDA). (2019). CARE Principles for Indigenous data governance. https://www.gida-global.org/care.
   Google Scholar
• Grand View Research Inc. (2022, April 6). Precision farming market. PR Newswire. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/precision-farming-market-size-worth-20-84-billion-by-2030-grand-view-research-inc-301518748.html.
   Google Scholar
• Kōkiri, T. P. (2001). He Tirohanga O Kawa Ki Te Tiriti O Waitangi: A guide to the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi as expressed by the courts and the Waitangi Tribunal. Te Puni Kokiri.
   Google Scholar
• Legun, K., Burch, K., & Klerkx, L. (2022). Can a robot be an expert? The social meaning of skill and its expression through the prospect of autonomous AgTech. Agriculture and Human Values. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-022-10388-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liboiron, M. (2021). Pollution is colonialism. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Māori Law Review. (2014, November). Waitangi Tribunal finds Treaty of Waitangi signatories did not cede sovereignty in February 1840. https://maorilawreview.co.nz/2014/11/waitangi-tribunal-finds-treaty-of-waitangi-signatories-did-not-cede-sovereignty-in-february-1840/.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, C. (2019). The combine will tell the truth: On precision agriculture and algorithmic rationality. Big Data and Society, 6(1), 1–12. doi:10.1177/2053951719849444
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Business Innovation and Employment. (2020). Agritech industry transformation plan. https://www.mbie.govt.nz/dmsdocument/11572-growing-innovative-industries-in-new-zealand-agritech-industry-transformation-plan-july-2020-pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Prause, L. (2021). Digital agriculture and labor: A few challenges for social sustainability. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13, 5980. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, D. C., & Chilvers, J. (2018). Agriculture 4.0: Broadening responsible innovation in an era of smart farming. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 2(December), 1–7. doi:10.3389/fsufs.2018.00087
   Google Scholar
• Rotz, S., Duncan, E., Small, M., Botschner, J., Dara, R., Mosby, I., … Fraser, E. D. G. (2019). The politics of digital agricultural technologies: A preliminary review. Sociologia Ruralis, 59(2), 203–229. doi:10.1111/soru.12233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taiuru, K. (2015). Definition: Digital colonialism. https://www.taiuru.maori.nz/definition-digital-colonialism/.
   Google Scholar
• Taiuru, K. (2018). Data is a Taonga: A customary Māori perspective. https://www.taiuru.maori.nz/data-is-a-taonga/.
   Google Scholar
• Taiuru, K. (2020). Treaty of Waitangi/Te Tiriti and Māori ethics guidelines for: AI, Algorithms, Data and IOT. http://www.taiuru.maori.nz/TiritiEthicalGuide.
   Google Scholar
• Taiuru, K. (2022a). A compendium of Māori data sovereignty. https://www.taiuru.maori.nz/compendium-of-maori-data-sovereignty/.
   Google Scholar
• Taiuru, K. (2022b). Honouring Te Tiriti o Waitangi in data and technology projects / Te whakahōnore i Te Tiriti o Waitangi i roto i te raraunga me ngā kaupapa hangarau. In A. Pendergrast, & K. Pendergrast (Eds.), More Zeroes and Ones: Digital Technology and Equity in Aotearoa New Zealand (pp. 47–63). Wellington: Bridget Williams Books.
   Google Scholar
• Visser, O., Sippel, S. R., & Thiemann, L. (2021). Imprecision farming? Examining the (in)accuracy and risks of digital agriculture. Journal of Rural Studies, 86(July 2020), 623–632. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.07.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waitangi Tribunal. (2021). Wai-2522 claim that the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA) (Report no. Wai 2522). Lower Hutt, New Zealand: Legislation Direct. https://forms.justice.govt.nz/search/Documents/WT/wt_DOC_178856069/CPTTP%20W.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfert, S., Ge, L., Verdouw, C., & Bogaardt, M.-J. (2017). Big data in smart farming – A review. Agricultural Systems, 153, 69–80. doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2017.01.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar