Reform Implementation Studies as a Basis for Curriculum Theory: Three Swedish Approaches

REFERENCES

• Amidon, E., and Hunter, E. Improving teaching. The analysis of classroom verbal interaction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Bellack, A., Kliebard, H. M., Hyman, R. T., and Smith, F. L. The language of the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Biddle, B. J. “Methods and concepts in classroom research.” Review of Educational Research, 37:3 (1967), 337–357.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. “Learning for mastery.” UCLA Evaluation Comment 1, no. 2 (1968).
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. B. “A model for school learning.” Teachers College Record 64 (1963), 723–733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervall, L. New system for curriculum development. OECD, 1969. (Mimeographed.)
   Google Scholar
• Dahllöf, U. Ability grouping, content validity and curriculum process analysis. New York: Teachers College Press, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Dahllöf, U. Kraven pa gymnasiet. SOU 1963:22. Stockholm: Ecklesiastikdepartementet, 1963.
   Google Scholar
• Dahllöf, U. “Curriculum process analysis and comparative evaluation of school systems.” Paedagogica Europaea VI (1970), in press, (a)
   Google Scholar
• Dahllöf, U. “Materials and methods of implementing curricula.” Curriculum Theory Network 5 (1970), 32–49. (b)
   Google Scholar
• Dahllöf, U. “Recent reforms of secondary education in Sweden.” Comparative Education 2 (1966), 71–92.
   Google Scholar
• Dahllöf, U. Skoldifferentiering och undervisningsförlopp. Göteborg Studies in Educational Sciences 2. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Dahllöf, U., and Lundgren, U. P. “Macro and micro approaches combined for curriculum process analysis: A Swedish educational field project.” Paper read at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association in Minneapolis, March 2–6, 1970. Göteborg: Reports from the Institute of Education 10, 1970. (Mimeographed.)
   Google Scholar
• Dahllöf, U., and Lundgren, U. P. A project concerning macro-models for the curriculum process. A short presentation. Göteborg: Reports from the Institute of Education 5, 1969. (Mimeographed.)
   Google Scholar
• Dahllöf, U., Zetterlund, S., and Öberg, H. Secondary Education in Sweden. Stockholm: National Board of Education, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Dottrens, R. The primary school curriculum. Paris: UNESCO, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Flanders, N. A. Teacher influence, pupil attitudes and achievement. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Herbert, J. “A system for analysing lessons.” New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, 1964. (Mimeographed.)
   Google Scholar
• Herbert, J. A system for analysing lessons. New York: Teachers College Press, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Honigman, F. K. “Multidimensional Analysis of Classroom Interaction(“MACI”)Villanova University Press, Villanova, Penn., 1967. (Mimeographed.)
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard-Jones, M. “Reliability in category coding.” Los Angeles: UCLA, CSE Working paper 2, 1969. (Mimeographed.)
   Google Scholar
• Husén, T., and Boalt, G. Educational research and educational change. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell and New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Härnqvist, K., and Grahm, A. Vägen genom gymnasiet. (“The road through the gymnasium”) Summary in English. Stockholm: Ecklesiastikdepartementet, 1963.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, P. Life in classroom. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• de Landsheere, G., and Bayer, E. Comment les maîtres enseignent. Analyse des interactions verbales en classe. Université de Liège, Documentation, Ministère de l'éducation et de la culture, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Mallea, J. R. “The implementation of Swedish educational policy and planning.” Comparative Education 6 (1970), 99–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Board of Education. Läuroplan för gymnasiet. Stockholm: Kungl. Skoloverstyrelsen, 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, G., and Siöö, M. “Gymnasiets nya arbetsformer.” Göteborg: Rapporter fran Pedagogiska Institutionen, Göteborgs universitet 50, 1970. (Mimeographed.)
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. O., and Meux, M. “A study of the logic of teaching.” Urbana, Ill.: Bureau of Educational Research, College of Education, University of Illinois, 1962. (Mimeographed.)
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L., and Geoffrey, L. M. The complexities of an urban classroom. An analysis toward a general theory of teaching. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Stuk´t, K.-G., and Engström, R. “TV-observationer av lärarkarakteristika i klassrummet.” Göteborg: Pedagogiska Institutionen. Lärarhögskolan i Göteborg, 1966. (Mimeographed.)
   Google Scholar
• Stukat, K.-G., and Engström, R. “TV-observations of teacher activities in the classroom.” Pedagogisk forskning, no. 3 (1965), 96–117.
   Google Scholar