REFERENCES
- Downey, Lawrence W. The Task of Public Education: The Perception of People. Chicago: Midwest Administration Center, University of Chicago, 1960.
- Gooler, Dennis D. “Strategies for Obtaining Clarification of Priorities in Education.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana, 1971.
- Gooler, Dennis D., and Grotelueschen, A.D. “Accountability in Curriculum Evaluation.” Curriculum Theory Network, 7(September 1971), 27–34.
- Moynihan, Daniel P. Counselor's Statement. Toward Balanced Growth: Quantity and Quality. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1970. pp. 3–15.
- Popham, W. James. “Educational Needs Assessment.” Curriculum Theory Network, present issue.
- Scriven, Michael. “The Methodology of Evaluation.” Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation. Edited by R. E. Stake. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1967.
- Stake, Robert E. “The Countenance of Educational Evaluation.” Teachers College Record 68 (1967), 523–540.
- Stufflebeam, Daniel E. “Evaluation as Enlightenment for Decision Making.” Improving Educational Assessment and an Inventory of Measures of Affective Behavior. Washington: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1969.
- Tyler, Ralph W. “General Statement on Evaluation.” Journal of Educational Research (March 1942), 492–501.
- Wardrop, James L. “Determining ‘Most Probable’ Causes: A Call for Re-Examining Evaluation Methodology.” Paper read at American Educational Research Association Meeting, New York, 1971.
- Wilder, David, et al. Actual and Perceived Consensus on Educational Goals between School and Community, New York: Bureau of Applied Social Research, Columbia University, 1968.
- Ziegler, Warren. “Some Notes on How Educational Planning in the United States Looks at the Future. Part I.” Notes on the Future of Education 1 (1969), 2–4.