An Instructional Evaluation Monitoring System

REFERENCES

• Airasian, P. W. “Formative Evaluation Instruments.” The Irish Journal of Education, 2 (Winter 1968), 127–135.
   Google Scholar
• Airasian, P. W. “The Use of Hierarchies in the Analysis and Planning of Chemistry Instruction.” Science Education, 54 (1970), 91–95.
   Google Scholar
• Airasian, P. W. “A Study of Behaviorally Dependent, Classroom Taught Task Hierarchies.” Educational Technology Research Report Series. In press.
   Google Scholar
• Airasian, P. W. “The Role of Evaluation in Mastery Learning.” Mastery Learning: Theory and Practice. Edited by J. Block. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. “Learning for Mastery.” UCLA Center for the Study of Evaluation in Instructional Programs Evaluation Comment, 1 (May 1968), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S., Hastings, J. T., and Madaus, G. F. Handbook on Formative and Summative Evaluation of Student Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Bracht, G. H. “The Relationship of Treatment Tasks, Personological Variables, and Dependent Variables to Aptitude Treatment Interactions.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Graduate School of Education of the University of Colorado, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. “Course Improvement Through Evaluation.” Teachers College Record, 64 (1963), 672–683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer, H. S. “The Role of Evaluation in Curriculum Innovation.” Proceedings of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development Pre-conference Seminar. Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service, 1969. pp. 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Ebel, R. L. “Behavioral Objectives: A Closer Look.” Phi Delta Kappan, 52(3), 1970, 171–173.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W. Instructional and Expressive Objectives: Their Formulation and Rise in Curriculum. AERA Monograph Series on Curriculum Evaluation, No. 3. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Gagné, R. M. “The Acquisition of Knowledge.” Psychological Review 69 (1962), 355–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grobman, H. Evaluation Activities of Curriculum Projects. A Starting Point. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G. “Methodological Strategies for Educational Change.” Paper presented to the Conference on Strategies for Educational Change, Washington, D.C., November 8–10, 1965. Mimeographed.
   Google Scholar
• Halverson, P. M. “A Research Model to Assess Readiness for Change in Curriculum and Instruction.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Minneapolis, Minnesota, March 2–6, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, P. W., and Belford, E. “Educational Objectives and the Joys of Teaching.” The School Review 73 (1965), 267–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kersh, E. “An Overview of the Discrepancy Evaluation Model and a Related Case Study.” July, 1969. Mimeographed.
   Google Scholar
• Lindvall, C. M., and Cox, R. C. “The Role of Evaluation in Programs for Individualized Instruction.” Educational Evaluation: New Roles, New Means. Sixty-Eighth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II. Edited by R. Tyler. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Madaus, G. F., and Airasian, P, W. “Placement, Formative, Diagnostic and Summative Evaluation of Classroom Learning.” Paper presented to the 1970 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Minneapolis, Minnesota, March 2–6, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• O'Reilly, R. P. “State Education Department Leadership in Project and Regional Evaluation Systems.” Paper presented to the 1970 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Minneapolis, Minnesota, March 2–6, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Ott, J. M. “Taxonomy of Administrative Information Needs: An Aid to Educational Planning and Evaluation.” Paper presented to the 1970 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Minneapolis, Minnesota, March 2–6, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Provus, M. “Evaluation of Ongoing Programs in the Public School System.” Educational Evaluation: New Roles, New Means. Sixty-Eighth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II. Edited by R. Tyler. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Scriven, M. “The Methodology of Evaluation.” Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation. Edited by R. Stake. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. “The Countenance of Educational Evaluation.” Teachers College Record, 68 (1967), 523–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. “Objectives, Priorities, and Other Judgment Data.” Review of Educational Research, 40 (1970), 181–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stufflebeam, D. “The Use and Abuse of Evaluation in Title III.” An address delivered at the National Symposium on Innovation. Sponsored by the Kittering Foundation and the U.S. Office of Education, Honolulu, Hawaii, July 1967. Mimeographed.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, P.A., and McGuire, T. O. “A Theoretical Evaluation Model.” Manitoba Journal of Educational Research, 1 (1966), 12–17.
   Google Scholar
• Thelen, H. A. “Matching Teachers and Pupils.” National Education Association Journal, 56 (1967), 18–20.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, R. W. Constructing Achievement Tests. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1934.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, R. W. Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction: Syllabus for Education 305. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1950.
   Google Scholar
• White, Mary A. “VALED: A System for Evaluative Educational Decisions.” Paper presented at the 1970 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Minneapolis, Minnesota, March 2–6, 1970.
   Google Scholar