3
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Some Problems in Evaluating a National Curriculum Project

Pages 232-241 | Published online: 15 Dec 2014

REFERENCES

  • Dale, Edgar, and Chall, Jeanne. “A Formula for Predicting Readability.” Educational Research Bulletin, 27, 1948.
  • Dull, C. E., Metcalf, H. C. and Williams, J. E. Modern Physics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1964.
  • Holton, G. H., Rutherford, F. J., and Watson, F.G. Harvard Project Physics: Experimental Version. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1967.
  • Lockard, J. David, ed. Sixth Report of the International Clearinghouse on Science and Mathematics Curricular Developments. College Park: University of Maryland, 1968. (ERIC: ED 020 143)
  • Mackay, Lindsay D. “Changes in Victorian Physics Students During Two Years of Physics Study.” The Australian Physicist (July 1970), 103–109.
  • Pella, Milton O., and Sherman, Jack. “A Comparison of Two Methods of Utilizing Laboratory Activity in Teaching the Course—IPS.” School Science and Mathematics, 64 (1969), 303–314.
  • Physical Science Study Committee. Physics. 2nd ed. Boston: D. C. Heath & Co., 1965.
  • Welch, Wayne W. “A Summative Evaluation of the PSNS Course.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching (in press).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.