Curriculum Evaluation and Literary Criticism: Comments on the Analogy

REFERENCES

• AYER, ALFRED JULES. Language, truth and logic. New York: Dover, 1952.
   Google Scholar
• BARNES, CLIVE. “A review of Robert Montgomery's Subject to Fits.” St. Louis Post-Dispatch, February 21, 1971, p. 4H.
   Google Scholar
• BELLOW, SAUL. Mr. Sammler's planet. New York: Viking, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES CURRICULUM STUDY. A formative evaluation of ME NOW, unit I, digestion and circulation. Boulder, Colorado: University of Colorado, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• BLACKMUR, RICHARD P. Form and value in modern poetry. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, A Doubleday Anchor Book, 1946.
   Google Scholar
• BROUDY, HARRY S. “The continuing search for criteria.” American Association of Colleges for Teachers (AACTE), Evaluative Criteria Paper no. 3, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• BURNETT, J.R. “Some observations on the logical implications of philosophic theory for educational theory and practice.” Proceedings of the fourteenth annual meeting of the Philosophy of Education Society. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 1958.
   Google Scholar
• BURNS, HOBERT W., and BRAUNER, CHARLES J., eds. Philosophy of education. New York: Ronald Press, 1962.
   Google Scholar
• CARNAP, RUDOLF. Philosophy and logical syntax. London: K. Paul, Trench, Trubner, 1935.
   Google Scholar
• DANIELS, L. B. “The justification of curricula.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• DENNY, T., and HOKE, G. “Appendix to a final report, Illinois State ESEA Title III evaluation project.” Center for Instructional Research and Curriculum Evaluation (CIRCE), Urbana-Champaign, University of Illinois, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• DEWEY, JOHN. Theory of valuation. In International encyclopedia of unified science, edited by Otto Neurath. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1939.
   Google Scholar
• FERGUSSON, F. Aristotle's “Poetics.” New York: Hill & Wang, 1961.
   Google Scholar
• FORD, G. W., and PUGNO, LAWRENCE, eds. The structure of knowledge and the curriculum. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1964.
   Google Scholar
• FORSTER, E. M. Aspects of the novel. New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1927.
   Google Scholar
• FROST, ROBERT. The poems of Robert Frost. New York: Random House, Modern Library, 1930.
   Google Scholar
• GAGNÉ, ROBERT. “Curriculum research and the promotion of learning.” In Perspectives of curriculum evaluation. Edited by Ralph Tyler, Robert Gagné, and Michael Scriven. American Educational Research Association Monograph Series on Curriculum Evaluation, No. 1. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• HANSEN, I. P., and SIMON, R. M., eds. The advisor. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• HASTINGS, J. THOMAS. “Curriculum evaluation: The whys and the outcomes.” Journal of Educational Measurement 3, no. 1 (Spring 1966): 27–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HASTINGS, J. THOMAS; WARDROP, JAMES L.; AND GOOLER, DENNIS. Evaluating geography courses: A model with illustrative applications. Washington, D. C.: Association of American Geographers, Commission on College Geography, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• HOOK, SIDNEY. “The scope of philosophy of education.” Harvard Educational Review 26, no. 2 (Spring 1956): 145–48.
   Google Scholar
• LINDVALL, C. M., and COX, RICHARD C. Evaluation as a tool in curriculum development: The IPI evaluation program. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• MACLEISH, ARCHIBALD. “Ars poetica.” In Collected Poems, 1917–1952. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1952.
   Google Scholar
• MANN, JOHN S. “Curriculum criticism.” Teachers College Record 71, no. 1 (September 1969): 27–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “NEWS FRONT.” Phi Delta Kappan 52, no. 10 (June 1971) 635.
   Google Scholar
• OLSON, ELDER, ed. Aristotle's “Poetics” and English literature. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1965.
   Google Scholar
• PHENIX, PHILIP H. “Curriculum and the analysis of language.” In Language and meaning, Edited by James B. MacDonald and Robert R. Leeper. Washington, D.C.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, NEA, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• POPHAM, W. JAMES, et al. Instructional objectives. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• RICHARDS, I. A. The philosophy of rhetoric. New York: Oxford University Press, A Galaxy Book, 1965.
   Google Scholar
• SCRIVEN, MICHAEL. Value claims in the social sciences. Lafayette, Ind.: Publication no. 123 of the Social Science Education Consortium, Purdue University, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• SCRIVEN, MICHAEL.. “Evaluating educational progress: A symposium.” Urban Review 3, no. 4 (February 1969): 4–22.
   Google Scholar
• SCRIVEN, MICHAEL. “Critique of the Phi Delta Kappa volume on educational evaluation.” Remarks prepared for the symposium on the volume at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• SCRIVEN, MICHAEL. “Prose and cons about goal-free evaluation.” Evaluation Comment 3, no. 4 (December 1972): 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• SMITH, R. A. “Aesthetic criticism: The method of aesthetic education.” Studies in Art Education 9, no. 3 (Spring 1968): 12–32.
   Google Scholar
• STAKE, ROBERT E. “An outline of a program evaluation plan for evaluating the pilot-demonstration phase of the FOLLOW-THROUGH program, academic year 1967–68.” University of Illinois, Center for Instructional Research and Curriculum Evaluation, 1967. (a)
   Google Scholar
• STAKE, ROBERT E.. “The countenance of educational evaluation.” Teachers College Record 68, no. 7 (April 1967): 523–40, 1967. (b)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• STAKE, ROBERT E. “Objectives, priorities, and other judgment data.” Review of Educational Research 40, no. 2 (April 1970): 181–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• STEVENSON, CHARLES LESLIE. “The emotive meaning of ethical terms.” Mind 46, no. 181 (January 1937): 14–31.
   Google Scholar
• TAYLOR, PAUL W. Normative discourse. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1961.
   Google Scholar
• VAN GHENT, DOROTHY. The English novel: Form and function. New York: Harper and Row, Harper Torchbooks, 1953.
   Google Scholar
• WARDROP, J. L. “Determining: ‘most probable causes’: A call for re-examining evaluation methodology.” University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: Center for Instructional Research and Curriculum Evaluation, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• WESTBURY, IAN. “Curriculum evaluation.” Review of Educational Research 40, no. 2 (April 1970): 239–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar