An Alternative Approach to Science Education Research: Drawing from Philosophical Analysis to Examine Practice

REFERENCES

• ATKIN, J. MYRON. “Research styles in science education.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 5, no. 4 (1967–1968): 338–45.
   Google Scholar
• CONNELLY, F. M. “Conceptual structure in ecology with special reference to an enquiry curriculum in ecology.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• CONNELLY, F. M.. “Logical reasoning in science education.” Theory into Practice 12, no. 5 (December 1973): 278–85.
   Google Scholar
• GLASS, GENE V. “The wisdom of scientific enquiry on education.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 9, no. 1 (1972): 3–18.
   Google Scholar
• GREEN, THOMAS F. The activities of teaching. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• GREEN, THOMAS F.. “A topology of the teaching concept.” In Concepts of teaching: Philosophical essays. Edited by Charles J. B. Macmillan and Thomas W. Nelson. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• HURD, PAUL DEHART. “Research in science education: Planning for the future.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 8, no. 3 (1971): 243–49.
   Google Scholar
• KILBOURN, BRENT. Analyzing the basis for knowledge claims in science textbooks: A method and a case study. Background paper no. 6 for the Explanatory Modes Project. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Department of Curriculum, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• KILBOURN, BRENT.. “Identifying world views projected by science teaching materials: A case study using Pepper's World hypotheses to analyze a biology textbook.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Toronto, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• KNELLER, GEORGE F. Logic and language of education. New York: John Wiley, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• KOMISAR, B. PAUL. “Teaching: Act and enterprise.” In Concepts of teaching: Philosophical essays. Edited by Charles J. B. Macmillan and Thomas W. Nelson. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• LASZLO, ERVIN. The systems view of the world. New York: George Braziller, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• MARTIN, JANE ROWLAND. Explaining, understanding, and teaching. Toronto: McGraw-Hill, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• MEEHAN, EUGENE. Explanation in social science: A system paradigm. Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey Press, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• MERTON, R. K. On theoretical sociology. New York: Free Press, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• MUNBY, A. H. “The use of three philosophical models of teaching to analyze selected science lessons.” M.A. thesis, University of Toronto. 1969. In preparation as background paper no. 5 for the Explanatory Modes Project. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Department of Curriculum.
   Google Scholar
• MUNBY, A. H.. “The provision made for selected intellectual consequences by science teaching: Derivation and application of an analytical scheme.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Toronto, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• NAGEL, ERNEST. The structure of science: Problems in the logic of scientific explanation. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1961.
   Google Scholar
• NOVAK, MICHAEL. The experience of nothingness. New York: Harper and Row, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• OAKESHOTT, MICHAEL. “Learning and teaching.” In The concept of education. Edited by R. S. Peters. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• PEPPER, STEPHEN C. World hypotheses: A study in evidence. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1942.
   Google Scholar
• PETERS, R. S. Ethics and education. London: George Allen and Unwin, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• PETERS, R. S.. Authority, responsibility and education. New York: Atherton Press, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• PRUSSO, KENNETH W. “The development of a scheme for analyzing and describing the epistemological criteria adhered to in secondary school natural science classroom communication.” Ed.D. dissertation, Temple University, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• ROBERTS, DOUGLAS A. “Science as an explanatory mode.” Main Currents in Modern Thought 26, no. 5 (May-June 1970): 131–39.
   Google Scholar
• ROSZAK, THEODORE. Where the wasteland ends. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1972.
   Google Scholar
• RUSSELL, THOMAS L. Toward understanding the use of argument and authority in science teaching. Background paper no. 7 for the Explanatory Modes Project. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Department of Curriculum, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• SCHEFFLER, ISRAEL. Conditions of knowledge: An introduction to epistemology and education. Chicago: Scott, Foresman, 1965. (a)
   Google Scholar
• SCHEFFLER, ISRAEL.. “Philosophical models of teaching.” Harvard Educational Review 35, no. 2 (Spring 1965): 131–43. (b)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCHWAB, JOSEPH J. “What do scientists do?” Behavioral Science 5, no. 1 (January 1960): 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• SCHWAB, JOSEPH J. (supervisor). Biology teacher's handbook. New York: John Wiley, 1963.
   Google Scholar
• SCHWAB, JOSEPH J.. “The practical: A language for curriculum.” School Review 78, no. 1 (November 1969): 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCHWAB, JOSEPH J. “The practical: Arts of eclectic.” School Review 79, no. 4 (August 1971): 493–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCHWAB, JOSEPH J. “The practical 3: Translation into curriculum.” School Review 81, no. 4 (August 1973): 501–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SHULMAN, LEE S. “Reconstruction of educational research.” Review of Educational Research 40, no. 3 (June 1970): 371–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SHULMAN, LEE S.. “The psychology of school subjects: A premature obituary?” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 11, no. 4 (1974): 319–39.
   Google Scholar
• SHULMAN, LEE S., and TAMIR, PINCHAS. “Research on teaching in the natural sciences.” In Second handbook of research on teaching. Edited by Robert M. W. Travers. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• SIMON, ANITA, and BOYER, E. GIL, eds. Mirrors for behavior: An anthology of observation instruments. Philadelphia: Research for Better Schools, 1967–70.
   Google Scholar
• SNOW, RICHARD E. “Theory construction for research on teaching.” In Second handbook of research on teaching. Edited by Robert M. W. Travers. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• SOLTIS, JONAS F. An introduction to the analysis of educational concepts. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• TOULMIN, STEPHEN. The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958.
   Google Scholar
• TOULMIN, STEPHEN. The philosophy of science: An introduction. New York: Harper and Row, 1960.
   Google Scholar
• TYLER, RALPH W. “Analysis of strengths and weaknesses in current research in science education.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 5, no. 1 (1967): 52–63. (a)
   Google Scholar
• TYLER, RALPH W.. “Resources, models, and theory in the improvement of research in science education.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 5, no. 1 (1967): 43–51. (b)
   Google Scholar
• VON BERTALANFFY, LUDWIG. General system theory. New York: George Braziller, 1968.
   Google Scholar
• WATSON, FLETCHER G. “Toward effective research in science education.” Theory into Practice 1, no. 5 (December 1962): 277–83.
   Google Scholar
• WATSON, FLETCHER G., and COOLEY, WILLIAM W. “Needed research in science education.” In Rethinking science education. Edited by Nelson B. Henry. Fifty-Ninth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 1960, Part 1. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education, 1960.
   Google Scholar
• WILSON, JOHN. Language and the pursuit of truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960.
   Google Scholar