The Irrealis Use of the Deictic TAM in Contemporary Russian

References

• Adamou, Evangelia. 2011. “Temporal Uses of Definite Articles and Demonstratives in Pomak (Slavic, Greece).” Lingua 121 (5):871–89. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2010.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamou, Evangelia.. 2015. “Distance in Tensed Nominals: A Typological Perspective.” In Distance in Language: Grounding a Metaphor, edited by Barbara Sonnenhauser and Anastasia Meermann, 69–94. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, Lois. 1970. Language Development: Form and Functions in Emerging Grammars. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, Joan and Suzanne Fleischman. 1995. “Modality in Grammar and Discourse.” In Modality in Grammar and Discourse, edited by Joan Bybee and Suzanne Fleischman, 1–14. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Cristofaro, Sonia. 2012. “Descriptive Notions vs. Grammatical Categories: Unrealized States of Affairs and ‘Irrealis’.” Language Sciences 34 (2):131–46. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2011.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diessel, Holger. 1999. Demonstratives: Form, Function and Grammaticalization. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Diewald, Gabriele and Elena Smirnova. 2010. Evidentiality in German: Linguistic Realization and Regularities in Grammaticalization. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Dobrushina, Nina. 2015. “The Verbless Subjunctive in Russian.” Scando-Slavica 61 (1):73–99. doi: 10.1080/00806765.2015.1042758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durst-Andersen, Per and Elena Lorentzen. 2015. “Russian Sentence Adverbials: Classification, Orientation and Representation.” Russian Linguistics 39 (1):33–62. doi: 10.1007/s11185-014-9139-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, Jennifer L. 2000. “Realis and Irrealis: Forms and Concepts of the Grammaticalisation of Reality.” Linguistic Typology 4 (1):55–90. doi: 10.1515/lity.2000.4.1.55
   Google Scholar
• Ewing, Michael C. 2005. Grammar and Inference in Conversation: Identifying Clause Structure in Spoken Javanese, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Fried, Mirjam. 2009. “Construction Grammar as a Tool for Diachronic Analysis.” Constructions and Frames 1 (2): 261–90. doi: 10.1075/cf.1.2.04fri
   Google Scholar
• Galinskaja, E.A. 2006. “Ob odnom relikte drevneslavjanskogo imperfekta v russkom jazyke.” Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Ser. 9 Filologija 6:47–60.
   Google Scholar
• Giacalone Ramat, Anna and Manana Topadze. 2007. “The Coding of Evidentiality: a Comparative Look at Georgian and Italian.” Rivista di Linguistica 19 (1):7–38.
   Google Scholar
• Givón, Talmy. 1984. Syntax: A Functional-Typological Introduction. Vol. 1. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Givón, Talmy.. 1994. “Irrealis and the Subjunctive.” Studies in Language 18:265–337. doi: 10.1075/sl.18.2.02giv
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Givón, Talmy.. 1995. Functionalism and Grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Givón, Talmy.. 2001. Syntax. An Introduction. Vol. 1. 2nd edition. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Grenoble, Lenore. 1998. Deixis and Information Packaging in Russian Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Grishina, Elena. 2009a. “Multimodal Russian Corpus (MURCO): General Structure and User Interface.” In NLP, Corpus Linguistics, Corpus Based Grammar Research. Fifth International Conference, edited by Jana Levická and Radovan Garabík, 119–31. Brno: Tribune.
   Google Scholar
• Grishina, Elena.. 2009b. “Multimodal Russian Corpus (MURCO): Types of Annotation and Annotator’s Workbenches”. In Corpus Linguistics Conferences CL2009, University of Liverpool, UK, 20–23 July 2009. http://ucrel.lancs.ac.uk/publications/cl2009/165_FullPaper.doc (last accessed 05.11.2017).
   Google Scholar
• Gurevich, Olga. 2010. “Conditional Constructions in English and Russian.” In Contrastive Studies in Construction Grammar, edited by Hans Christian Boas, 87–102. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Hancil, Sylvie, Haselow, Alexander and Margje Post. 2015. “Final Particles from a Typological Perspective.” In Final Particles, edited by Sylvie Hancil, Alexander Haselow and Margje Post, 3–37. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, Björn. 2010. “Mood in Russian.” In Mood in the Languages of Europe, edited by Björn Rothstein and Rolf Thieroff, 325–41. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Hayashi, Makoto and Kyung-Eun Yoon. 2010. “A Cross-linguistic Exploration of Demonstratives in Interaction: with Particular Reference to the Context of Word-Formulation Trouble.” In Fillers, Pauses and Placeholders, edited by Nino Amiridze, Boyd H. Davis and Margaret Maclagan, 33–66. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Herrmann, Annika. 2013. Modal and Focus Particles in Sign Languages. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Koester, Almut. 2007. “About Twelve Thousand or So’: Vagueness in North American and UK Offices.” In Vague Language Explored, edited by Joan Cutting, 40–61. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kuznecov, Sergej, ed. 1998. Bol′šoj tolkovyj slovar′ russkogo jazyka, St Peterburg: Norint.
   Google Scholar
• Levontina, Irina. 2011. “Časticy peresprosa i pripominania.” In Slovo i jazyk, edited by Igor Boguslavskij, Leonid Iomdin and Leonid Krysin, 269–78. Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskich kul′tur.
   Google Scholar
• Levontina, Irina and Alexei Shmelev, A. 2007. “False Emptiness: Are So-called “Parasitical Words” Really Semantically Void?” In Meaning-Text Theory 2007, edited by Kim Gerdes, Tilmann Reuther and Leo Wanner, 259–68. Munich: Otto Sagner.
   Google Scholar
• Malchukov, Andrej and Viktor Xrakovskij. 2016. “The Linguistic Interaction of Mood with Modality and Other Categories.” In The Oxford Handbook of Modality and Mood, edited by Jan Nuyts and Johan Van Der Auwera, 196–222. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, Laura. 1998. “Irrealis Constructions in Mocho (Mayan).” Anthropological Linguistics 40 (2):198–213.
   Google Scholar
• Mauri, Caterina. 2008. Coordination Relations in the Languages of Europe and Beyond. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Mauri, Caterina and Andrea Sansò. 2012. “What Do Languages Code When They Code Reality Status?” Language Sciences 34 (2):99–106. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2010.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendoza, Imke. 2004. “Russisch TAM als “distanzmarker”?” In Germano-Slavistische Beiträge. Festschrift für Peter Rehder zum 65. Geburtstag, edited by Peter Rehder, Miloš Okuka and Ulrich Schweier, 157–86. Munich: Otto Sagner.
   Google Scholar
• Miestamo, Matti. 2005. Standard Negation: The Negation of Declarative Verbal Main Clauses in a Typological Perspective. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Mihatsch, Wiltrud. 2010. “The Diachrony of Rounders and Adaptors.” In New Approaches to Hedging, edited by Gunther Kaltenböck, Wiltrud Mihatsch and Stefan Schneider, 93–122. Bingley: Emerald.
   Google Scholar
• Mithun, Marianne. 1995. “On the Relativity of Irreality.” In Modality in Grammar and Discourse, edited by Joan Bybee and Suzanne Fleischman, 367–88. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Mithun, Marianne. 1999. The Languages of Native North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, Lynn. 2005. “Counterfactuality in Burmese.” In Polymorphous Linguistics: Jim McCawley's Legacy, edited by Salikoko S. Mufwene, Elaine Francis and Rebecca S. Wheeler, 283-294. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Overstreet, Maryann and George Yule. 1997. “On Being Inexplicit and Stuff in Contemporary American English.” Language in Society 25 (3):250–58.
   Google Scholar
• Pen′kovskij, Aleksandr. 1989. “O semantičeskoj kategorii ‘čuždosti’ v russkom jazyke.” In Problemy strukturnoj lingvistiki, 1985–1987, edited by Viktor Grigor′ev, 54–83. Moscow: Nauka.
   Google Scholar
• Pietrandrea, Paola. 2012. “The Conceptual Structure of Irreality: A Focus on Non-Exclusion-of-Factuality as a Conceptual and a Linguistic Category.” Language Sciences 34 (2):184–99. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2011.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plungian, Vladimir. 2005. “Irrealis and Modality in Russian and in Typological Perspective.” In Modality in Slavonic languages: New perspectives, edited by Björn Hansen and Petr Karlík, 135–47. Munich: Otto Sagner.
   Google Scholar
• Plungian, Vladimir.. 2010. “Types of Verbal Evidentiality Marking: An Overview.” In Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages, edited by Gabriele Diewald and Elena Smirnova, 15–58. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Podlesskaya, V. 2010. “Parameters for Typological Variation of Placeholders.” In Fillers, Pauses and Placeholders, edited by Nino Amiridze, Boyd H. Davis, Margaret Maclagan, 11–32. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Rubinštejn, M.L. 2004. “Puti grammatikalizacii prostranstvennych narečij: načalo issledovanija (na materiale russkich tut/tam v sravnenii s anglijskimi here/there).” Doklady meždunarodnoj konferencii Dialog 2004. http://www.dialog-21.ru/media/2561/rubinshtein.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Slobin, Dan and Ayhan Aksu. 1982. “Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Use of the Turkish Evidential.” In Tense-Aspect between Semantics and Pragmatics, edited by Paul J. Hopper, 185–200. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Šmelev, Aleksej. 2007. “Častica tam kak marker ‘nesuščestvennoj detali’.” In Jazyk kak materija smysla, edited by Majja Ljapon, 208–18. Moscow: Azbukovnik.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, Andrew and Ana R. Luis. 2012. Clitics: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Švedova, Natalija. 1960. Očerki po sintaksisu russkoj razgovornoj reči, Moscow: Izdatel′stvo AN-SSSR.
   Google Scholar
• Vidal, Alejandra and Harriett Manelis Klein. 1998. “Irrealis in Pilagá and Toba? Syntactic versus Pragmatic Coding.” Anthropological Linguistics, 40 (2):175–97.
   Google Scholar
• Wiemer, Björn. 2010. “Hearsay in European Languages: Toward an Integrative Account of Grammatical and Lexical Marking.” In Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages, edited by Gabriele Diewald and Elena Smirnova, 59–132. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, David, Christopher Lucas and Anne Breitbarth. 2013. “Comparing Diachronies of Negation.” In The History of Negation in the Languages of Europe and the Mediterranean: Volume I Case Studies, edited by David Willis, Christopher Lucas and Anne Breitbarth, 1–50. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar