Middle Russian Future Periphrastic Constructions in the Light of Language Contacts

References

• Andersen, H. 2006а. “Future and Future Perfect in the Old Novgorod Dialect.” Russian Linguistics 30 (1):71–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, H. 2006b. “Periphrastic Futures in Slavic. Divergence and Convergence.” In Change in Verbal Systems: Issues in Explanation, edited by K. Eksell and T. Vinther, 9–45. Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Ariste, P. 1968. A Grammar of the Votic Language (Uralic and Altaic Series 68). Bloomington: Indiana University Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, J. L. and Ö. Dahl. 1989. “The Creation of Tense and Aspect Systems in the Languages of the World.” Studies in Language 13:51–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bybee, J. L., W. Pagliuca and R. D. Perkins. 1991. “Back to the Future.” In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. II (Focus on Types of Grammatical Markers), edited by E. C. Traugott and B. Heine, 17–58. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, J. L., W. Pagliuca and R. D. Perkins. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, J. L. and W. Pagliuca. 1987. “The Evolution of Future Meaning.” In Papers from the VII International Conference on Historical Linguistics, edited by A. G. Ramat, O. Carruba, G. Bernini, 109–122. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, J. L. and S. Thompson. 1997. “Three Frequency Effects in Syntax.” In Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Structure:378—388.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Ö. 2000. “The Grammar of Future Time Reference in European Languages.” In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, edited by Ö. Dahl, 309–28. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Fournet, A. 2012. “Mokša Mordvin Verbal Negation Described and Compared with other Uralo-Altaic Languages.” In Rice Working Papers in Linguistics 3, https://hdl.handle.net/1911/64173.
   Google Scholar
• Heine, B. and T. Kuteva. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hopper, P. J. 1991. “On Some Principles of Grammaticization.” In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 1, edited by E. C. Traugott and B. Heine, 17–36. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Jankoŭski, F. 1983. Histаryčnaja gramatyka belaruskaj movy. Mіnsk: Vyšėjšaja škola.
   Google Scholar
• Jur′eva, I. S. 2009. Semantika glagolov iměti, chotěti, načati (počati) v sočetanijach s infinitivom v jazyke drevnerusskich pamjatnikov XII–XV vv. (Kandidatskaja dissertacija). Moscow.
   Google Scholar
• Jur′eva, I. S. 2010. “Osobennosti drevnerusskich infinitivnych sočetanij s glagolom načati.” Russkij jazyk v naučnom osveščenii 20 (2):270-287.
   Google Scholar
• Jur′eva, I. S. 2011. “Infinitivnye sočetanija s glagolami imam′ i imu v drevnerusskich tekstach.” Russkij jazyk v naučnom osveščenii 22 (2):68–88.
   Google Scholar
• Jur′eva, I. S. 2016. “Mesto infinitivnych konstrukcij s načinatel′nymi glagolami v sisteme prošedšich vremёn drevnerusskiсh i cerkovnoslavjanskich tekstov.” In Trudy Instituta russkogo jazyka im. V. V. Vinogradova X: Materialy meždunarodnoj naučnoj konferencii «Grammatičeskie processy i sistemy v sinchronii i diachronii» (30 maja–1 ijunja 2016g.), edited by A. M. Moldovan, 544–553. Moscow: Institut russkogo jazyka im. V. V. Vinogradova RAN.
   Google Scholar
• Korotkova, N. A. and S. S. Saj. 2006. “Glagol stat′ v russkom jazyke: semantika, sintaksis, grammatikalizacija.” In Tret′ja konferencija po tipologii i grammatike dlja molodych issledovatelej (Sankt-Peterburg, 2–4 nojabrja 2006g.): Materialy, edited by A. P. Vydrin, D. V. Gerasimov, S. Ju. Dmitrenko, N. M. Zaika and S. S. Saj, 96–101. St Petersburg: Nestor-istorija.
   Google Scholar
• Křížková, H. 1960. Vývoj opisného futura v jazycích slovanských, zvláště v ruštině. Prague: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství.
   Google Scholar
• Levičkin, A. I. and S. A. Myznikov. 2006. Slovar′ oblastnogo vologodskogo narečija, po rukopisi P. A. Dilaktorskogo 1902g. St Petersburg: Nauka.
   Google Scholar
• Matras, Y. 2007. “The Borrowability of Structural Categories.” In Grammatical Borrowing in Cross-Linguistic Perspective, edited by Y. Matras and J. Sakel. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Mel′ničenko, G. G. 1991. Jaroslavskij oblastnoj slovar′. Vyp. 10. Jaroslavl′: JaGPI im. K. D. Ušinskogo.
   Google Scholar
• Metslang, H. 1996. “The Development of the Futures in the Finno-Ugric Languages.” In Estonian: Typological Studies I (Ülikooli eesti keele õppetooli toimetised 4), edited by M. Erelt, 123−144. Tartu: Ülikooli Kirjastus.
   Google Scholar
• Moldovan, A. M. 2010. “K istorii fazovogo glagola stat′ v russkom jazyke.” Russkij jazyk v naučnom osveščenii 19 (1):5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, M. 1998. Die polnische, ukrainische und weißrussische Interferenzschicht im russischen Satzbau des 16. und 17. Jahrhunderts. Frankfurt/Main etc.: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• NKRJA – Nacional′nyj korpus russkogo jazyka, http://www.ruscorpora.ru.
   Google Scholar
• Panikarovskaja, T. G. and L. Ju. Zorina. 2005. Slovar′ Vologodskich govorov. Vyp. 11. Vologda: GOU VPO «VGPU», izd-vo «Rus′».
   Google Scholar
• Penkova, Y. A. 2014. “K voprosu o semantike tak nazyvaemogo buduščego složnogo II v drevnerusskom jazyke (na materiale «Žitija Andreja Jurodivogo»).” Russkij jazyk v naučnom osveščenii 27 (1):150–84.
   Google Scholar
• Penkova, Y. A. 2019a. “Imu, učnu, stanu, budu: korpusnoe issledovanie perifraz buduščego vremeni v srednerusskoj pis′mennosti.” Slavistična revija 67 (4):569–86.
   Google Scholar
• Penkova, Y. A. 2019b. “Predbuduščee (vtoroe buduščee) v drevnenovgorodskom dialekte: vremja ili naklonenie?” Russian Linguistics 43 (1):65–78.
   Google Scholar
• Penkova, Y. A. 2021. “K voprosu o grammatikalizacii glagola stati v istorii russkogo jazyka.” In Slova, konstrukcii i teksty v istorii russkoj pis′mennosti: Sbornik statej k 70-letiju akademika A. M. Moldovana, edited by I. I. Makeeva and A. A. Pičchadze. Moscow. Forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Pennington, A. E. 1968. “Future Periphrases in 17th-Century Russian: Some Evidence from Translated Material.” The Slavonic and East European Review 46 (106):31–47.
   Google Scholar
• Podvysockij, A. 1885. Slovar′ oblastnogo archangel′skago narěčija v ego bytovom i etnografičeskom priměnenii. St Petersburg: Tipografija Imperatorskoj Akademii Nauk.
   Google Scholar
• Rjabinin, E. A. 1990. “Slavjano-finno-ugorskie kontakty na severe Vostočnoj Evropy v ėpochu Srednevekov′ja.” In Uralo-Indogermanica. Balto-slavjanskie jazyki i problema uralo-indoevropejskich svjazej: Materialy 3-ej balto-slavjanskoj konferencii 18–22 ijunja 1990g., edited by Vjač. Vs. Ivanov, T. M. Sudnik and E. A. Chelimskij, 44–51. Moscow: Nauka.
   Google Scholar
• Sakel, J. 2007. “Types of Loans: Matter and Pattern.” In Grammatical Borrowing in Cross-Linguistic Perspective, edited by Y. Matras and J. Sakel, 15–29. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Semenkova, R. V. 2006. Slovar′ russkich govorov na territorii respubliki Mordovija. T-YA. Saransk: izd-vo Mord. un-ta.
   Google Scholar
• Seržant, I. A. 2021. “Slavic Morphosyntax is Primarily Determined by its Geographic Location and Contact Configuration.” Scando-Slavica 67 (1).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stojnova, N. M. 2019. “Buduščee nesoveršennogo vida i infinitivnoe sočetanie s glagolom stat′ kak konkurirujuščie konstrukcii v sovremennom russkom jazyke.” Russkij jazyk v naučnom osveščenii 37 (1):58–82.
   Google Scholar
• Swan, O. E. 2012. “Why budu?” Russian Linguistics 36:305–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ševeleva, M. N. 2017. “K probleme grammatičeskoj semantiki konstrukcij tipa imat′ byti vs. chočet′ byti v rannich vostočnoslavjanskich tekstach.” Russkij jazyk v naučnom osvešcčenii 34 (2):194–218.
   Google Scholar
• Thomason, S. and T. Kaufman. 1988. Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ultan, R. 1978. “The Nature of Future Tenses.” In Universals of Human Language, Vol. 3: Word Structure, edited by J. H. Greenberg, Ch. A. Ferguson and E. Moravcsik, 83–123. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whaley, M. L. 2000. The Evolution of the Slavic ‘BE(COME)’-Type Compound Future (PhD Dissertation). The Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Wiemer, B. and B. Hansen. 2012. “Assessing the Range of Contact-Induced Grammaticalization in Slavonic.” In Grammatical Replication and Borrowability in Language Contact, edited by B. Wiemer, B. Wälchli and B. Hansen, 67−155. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Živov, V. M. 2017. Istorija jazyka russkoj pis′mennosti, Vol. 1. Moscow: Russkij fond sodejstvija obrazovaniju i nauke.
   Google Scholar