Salience of Greater Poland Polish Phonetic Variables

References

• Albin, Aaron. 2014. “PraatR: An Architecture for Controlling the Phonetics Software “Praat” with the R Programming Language.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 135 (4):2198.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, Henning. 1986. “Sandhi and Prosody: Reconstruction and Typology”. In Sandhi Phenomena in the Languages of Europe, edited by Henning Andersen, 231–248. The Hague – Berlin: Mouton der Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Baranowska, Karolina, and Kamil Kaźmierski. 2020. “Polish Word-Final Nasal Vowels: Variation and, Potentially, Change.” Sociolinguistic Studies 4(1–2):135–162. DOI:10.1558/sols.37918.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker, and Steve Walker. 2015. “Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4.” Journal of Statistical Software 67 (1):1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumann, Andreas, and Kamil Kaźmierski. 2018. “Assessing the Effect of Ambiguity in Compositionality Signaling on the Processing of Diphones.” Language Sciences 67 (May):14–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2018.03.006.
   Google Scholar
• Bergstrom, Brittni Elizabeth. 2017. “Effect of Speaker Age and Dialect on Listener Perceptions of Personality.” Master’s thesis, Brigham Young University. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/6397.
   Google Scholar
• Bethin, Christina. 1984. “Voicing Assimilation in Polish.” International Journal of Slavic Linguistics and Poetics 29:17–32.
   Google Scholar
• Boersma, David, and Paul Weenink. 2018. “Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [Computer Program]. Version 6.0.41, retrieved 15 Aug 2018 from http://www.praat.org/.”
   Google Scholar
• Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2008. “I’ll Be the Judge of That: Diversity in Social Perceptions of (ING).” Language in Society 37 (5):637–59. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404508080974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cargile, Aaron Castelan, and Howard Giles. 1998. “Language Attitudes Toward Varieties of English: An American-Japanese Context.” Journal of Applied Communication Research 26 (3):338–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909889809365511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clopper, Cynthia G., and David B. Pisoni. 2004. “Some Acoustic Cues for the Perceptual Categorization of American English Regional Dialects.” Journal of Phonetics 32 (1):111–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0095-4470(03)00009-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cyran, Eugeniusz. 2012. “Cracow Sandhi Voicing Is Neither Phonological nor Phonetic. It Is Bothphonological and Phonetic.” In Sound Structure and Sense. Studies in Memory of Edmund Gussmann, edited by Eugeniusz Cyran, Bogdan Szymanek, and Henryk Kardela, 153–83. Lublin: KUL.
   Google Scholar
• Dejna, Karol. 1973. Dialekty Polskie. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolinskich.
   Google Scholar
• Draxler, Christoph, and Klaus Jänsch. 2004. “SpeechRecorder. A Universal Platform Independent Multi-Channel Audio Recording Software.” In Proceedings of LREC, 559–62. Lisbon: European Language Resources Association.
   Google Scholar
• Dubisz, Stanisław, Halina Karaś, and Nijola Kolis. 1995. Dialekty i Gwary Polskie. Warsaw: Wiedza Powszechna.
   Google Scholar
• Dunaj, Bogusław. 2006. “Zasady Poprawnej Wymowy Polskiej.” Język Polski 3: 161–72.
   Google Scholar
• Gussmann, Edmund. 2007. The Phonology of Polish. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, Karolina. 2014. Stosunek Polaków Do Dialektów Regionalnych: Raport Na Podstawie Polskiego Sondażu Uprzedzeń 2013. Warsaw: Centrum Badań nad Uprzedzeniami.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, Sandra. 2014. “Salience Effects in the North-West of England.” Linguistik Online 66 (4). https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.66.1574.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Jane. 1984. “Variations in Polish Nasal /ę/: A Contribution to the Development of Contrastive Sociolinguistic Methodology.” In Papers and Studies in Contrastive Linguistics, Vol. XVIII, edited by Jacek Fisiak, 31–41. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu.
   Google Scholar
• Karaś, Mieczysław. 1977. “Przedmowa.” In The Dictionary of Polish Pronunciation, VII–VIII. Warsaw: PWN.
   Google Scholar
• Kaźmierski, Kamil, Małgorzata Kul, and Paulina Zydorowicz. 2019. “Educated Poznań Speech 30 Years Later.” Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis 136 (4):245–64. https://doi.org/10.4467/20834624SL.19.021.11314.
   Google Scholar
• Kaźmierski, Kamil, and Marta Szlandrowicz. 2020. “Word-Final /ɔ̃/ in Greater Poland Polish: A Cumulative Context Effect?” Research in Language 18 (4):381–94. https://doi.org/10.18778/1731-7533.18.4.02.
   Google Scholar
• Klemensiewicz, Zenon. 1965. Podstawowe wiadomości z gramatyki języka polskiego. Warszawa: PWN.
   Google Scholar
• Kliegl, Reinhold, Michael E. J. Masson, and Eike M. Richter. 2010. “A Linear Mixed Model Analysis of Masked Repetition Priming.” Visual Cognition 18 (5):655–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280902986058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lenth, Russell V. 2021. “Emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, Aka Least-Squares Means.” https://github.com/rvlenth/emmeans.
   Google Scholar
• Levon, Erez, and Sue Fox. 2014. “Social Salience and the Sociolinguistic Monitor.” Journal of English Linguistics 42 (3):185–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424214531487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llamas, Carmen, Dominic Watt, and Andrew E. MacFarlane. 2016. “Estimating the Relative Sociolinguistic Salience of Segmental Variables in a Dialect Boundary Zone.” Frontiers in Psychology 7 (August). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenc, Anita, Daniel Król, and Katarzyna Klessa. 2018. “An Acoustic Camera Approach to Studying Nasality in Speech: The Case of Polish Nasalized Vowels.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 144 (6):3603 –3617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandera, Paweł, Emmanuel Keuleers, Zofia Wodniecka, and Marc Brysbaert. 2015. “SUBTLEX-PL: Subtitle-Based Word Frequency Estimates for Polish.” Behavior Research Methods 47 (2):471–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostaszewska, Danuta, and Jolanta Tambor. 2000. Fonetyka i Fonologia Współczesnego Języka Polskiego. Warsaw: PWN.
   Google Scholar
• Paltridge, J., and H. Giles. 1984. “Attitudes Towards Speakers of Regional Accents of French: Effects of Regionality, Age and Sex of Listeners.” Linguistische Berichte 90: 71–85.
   Google Scholar
• Peirce, Jonathan, Jeremy R. Gray, Sol Simpson, Michael MacAskill, Richard Höchenberger, Hiroyuki Sogo, Erik Kastman, and Jonas Kristoffer Lindeløv. 2019. “PsychoPy2: Experiments in Behavior Made Easy.” Behavior Research Methods 51 (1):195–203. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, Dennis R. 2010. “Variation in Language Regard.” In Empirische Evidenzen Und Theoretische Passungen Sprachlicher Variation, edited by Peter Gilles, Joachim Scharloth, and Evelyn Zeigler, 7–27. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Preston, Dennis R. 2011. “The Power of Language Regard — Discrimination, Classification, Comprehension, and Production.” Dialectologia Special Issue, II:9–33.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2022. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, Geoffrey, Kamil Kaźmierski and Ewelina Wojtkowiak. 2021. “Perspectives on Final Laryngeal Neutralization. New Evidence from Polish.” Phonology 38 (4):693–727. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675721000373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strycharczuk, Patrycja. 2012. “Phonetics-Phonology Interactions in Pre-Sonorant Voicing.” PhD Thesis, University of Manchester. https://personalpages.manchester.ac.uk/staff/patrycja.strycharczuk/Research_files/PhD_2_sided.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Trudgill, Peter. 1986. Dialects in Contact. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, Hadley. 2016. Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Second. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, Hadley, Romain Francois, Lionel Henry, and Kirill Müller. 2017. dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, Bodo. 2015. “The Other N: The Role of Repetitions and Items in the Design of Phonetic Experiments.” In Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, edited by The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015, Paper number 0181.1–5. Glasgow, UK: University of Glasgow. https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2015/Papers/ICPHS0181.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Witaszek-Samborska, M. 1985. “Regionalizmy Fonetyczne w Mowie Inteligencji Poznańskiej.” Slavia Occidentalis 17:91–104.
   Google Scholar
• Wojtkowiak, Ewelina, and Geoffrey Schwartz. 2018. “Sandhi-Voicing in Dialectal Polish: Prosodic Implications.” Studies in Polish Linguistics 13 (2):123–43. https://doi.org/10.4467/23005920spl.18.006.8745.
   Google Scholar
• Zagórska-Brooks, Maria. 1964. “On Polish Affricates.” WORD 20 (2):207–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajda, Aleksander. 1977. “Problemy Wymowy Polskiej w Ujęciu Słownika.” In The Dictionary of Polish Pronunciation, XXVII–XXXIX. Warsaw: PWN.
   Google Scholar
• Zaleska, Joanna, and Andrew Nevins. 2015. “Transformational Language Games and the Representation of Polish Nasal Vowels.” In NELS 45: Proceedings of the 45th Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society: Volume 3, 251–60. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
   Google Scholar