The ‘Chara hispida species complex’ (Charales, Charophyceae) kept in the Herbarium RO of the Sapienza University of Rome

References

• Arbeitsgruppe Characeen Deutschlands, editor. 2016. Armleuchteralgen – die Characeen Deutschlands [Charophytes – the Characeae of Germany]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. German.
   Google Scholar
• Avetta C. 1898. Nuova specie di Chara (Chara Pelosiana mihi) [New species of Chara (Chara Pelosiana)]. Malpighia. 12:229–235. Italian.
   Google Scholar
• Bazzichelli G, Abdelahad N. 2009. Alghe d’acqua dolce d’Italia. Flora analitica delle Caroficee [Freshwater algae of Italy: analytical Flora of Charophytes]. Sapienza Università di Roma - Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare. Italian. Roma: Centro Stampa Università.
   Google Scholar
• Béguinot A, Formiggini L. 1907. Ricerche ed osservazioni sopra alcune entità vicarianti nelle Characee della flora italiana [Research and observations on some vicarious entities in the Characeae of the Italian flora]. Bull Soc Bot Ital. 7–9:100–116. Italian.
   Google Scholar
• Béguinot A, Formiggini L. 1908. Ulteriori osservazioni sulle Caracee vicarianti della flora italiana [Further observations on the vicarious Characeae of the Italian flora]. Bull Soc Bot Ital. 4–6:78–86. Italian.
   Google Scholar
• Blindow I, Erichsen I. 2010. Cross fertilization within the species complex of Chara baltica. Charophytes. 2:59–65.
   Google Scholar
• Blindow I, Gregor T, Schubert H. 2018. The species complex Chara hispida: nomenclature, determination – and WHAT is a species?. In: Troia A, editor. Programme & abstracts of the 22nd meeting of the group of European Charophytologists (GEC22). Palermo:  Palermo University Press, Sept 17-21, 2018; p. 31.
   Google Scholar
• Boegle MG, Schneider SC, Schubert H, Melzer A. 2010. Distinguishing Chara baltica, C. horrida and C. liljebladii – conflicting results from analysis of morphology and genetics. Charophytes. 2:53–58.
   Google Scholar
• Braun A, Nordstedt O. 1882. Fragmente einer Monographie der Characeen. Nach den hinterlassenen Manuskripten A. Braun’s, herausgegeben von Dr. Otto Nordstedt [Fragments of a monograph of the Characeae. Based on manuscripts of the late A. Braun edited by Dr. Otto Nordstedt]. Berlin: Verlag der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften. German.
   Google Scholar
• Formiggini L. 1908a. Contributo alla conoscenza delle Caracee della Sicilia [Contribution to the knowledge of the Characeae of Sicily]. Bull Soc Bot It. 4–6:81–86. Italian
   Google Scholar
• Formiggini L. 1908b. Revisione critica delle Caracee della Flora Veneta compreso il Mantovano [Critical review of the Characeae of the Venetian Flora including the Mantuan area]. Atti Accad Ven-Trent-Istr. (Classe di scienze naturali, fisiche e matematiche), 1 ser. 3: 110–143. Italian.
   Google Scholar
• Formiggini L. 1909a. Contributo alla conoscenza delle Caracee del Lazio [Contribution to the knowledge of the Characeae of Lazio]. Ann Bot, Roma. 7:207–211. Italian
   Google Scholar
• Formiggini L. 1909b. Cenno storico-bibliografico sulle Caracee della flora italiana [Historical-bibliographical reference to the Characeae of the Italian flora]. Bull Soc Bot It. 1:14–26. Italian
   Google Scholar
• Krause W. 1997. Charales (Charophyceae). Süsswasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Bd 18. G. Jena: Fischer.
   Google Scholar
• Nowak P, Schubert H. 2019. Genetic variability of charophyte algae in the Baltic sea area. Bot Mar. 62(1):75–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowak P, Schubert H, Schaible R. 2016. Molecular evaluation of the validity of the morphological characters of three Swedish Chara section: Chara, Grovesia, and Desvauxia (Charales, Charophyceae). Acquatic Bot. 134:113–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasquale GA, Licopoli G. 1873. Di un viaggio botanico al Gargano [Of a botanical journey to the Gargano]. Atti R Accad Sc Fis Mat Napoli. 5(18): 1–31. Italian.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider SC, Nowak P, Von Ammon U, Ballot A. 2016. Species differentiation in the genus Chara (Charophyceae): considerable phenotypic occurs within homogeneous genetic groups. Eur J Phycol. 51(3):1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider SC, Rodrigues A, Fosholt Moe T, Ballot A. 2015. DNA Barcoding the genus Chara: molecular evidence recovers fewer taxa than the classical morphological approach. J Phycol. 51(2):367–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert H, Blindow I, van de Weyer K. 2016. Arbeitsgruppe Characeen Deutschlands (Ed.). Armleuchteralgen – die Characeen Deutschlands [Charophytes – the Characeae of Germany]: 218-227; 236-247; 261-270; 317-336; 345-354. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. German.
   Google Scholar
• Urbaniak J, Combik M. 2013. Genetic and morphological data fail to differentiate Chara intermedia from C. baltica, or C. polycantha and C. rudis from C. hispida. Eur J Phycol. 48(3):253–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanderpoorten A, Shaw J. 2010. The application of molecular data to the phylogenetic delimitation of species in bryophytes: a note of caution. Phytotaxa. 9:229–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood RD, Imahori K. 1965. A revision of the Characeae. Vol. 1. Monograph of the Characeae. Weinheim: J. Cramer.
   Google Scholar