Challenges in conflict management in multi-ethnic states – the dissolution of Czechoslovakia and Serbia and Montenegro

References

• Andeweg , Rudy . 2000 . Consociational Democracy . Annual Review of Political Science , 3 : 509 – 36 . Print
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry , Brian . 1975 . Political Accommodation and Consociational Democracy . British Journal of Political Science , 5 ( 4 ) : 477 – 505 . Print
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bieber , Florian . 2003 . “ Montenegrin Politics Since the Disintegration of Yugoslavia In Montenegro ” . In Transition Edited by: Bieber. , Florian . 11 – 42 . Print
   Google Scholar
• Bieber, Florian. The Instrumentalization of Minorities in the Montenegrin Dispute over Independence. ECMI Brief Report 8: 4. March 2002. Web. May 2009. <http://www.ecmi.de/download/brief_8.pdf>
   Google Scholar
• Bieber , Florian . 2003 . Transition: Problems of Identity and Statehood , Baden-Baden : Nomos . Print
   Google Scholar
• Bogaarts , Matthijs . 2003 . Electoral Choices for Divided Societies: Multi-Ethnic Parties and Constituency Pooling in Africa . Commonwealth & Comparative Politics , 41 ( 3 ) : 59 – 80 . Print
   Google Scholar
• Bogaarts , Matthijs . 1998 . The Favourable Factors for the Consociational Democracy: A Review . European Journal of Political Research , 33 ( 4 ) : 475 – 96 . Print
   Google Scholar
• Bottomore , Tom . 1964 . Elites and Society , 2 , London : Routledge . Print
   Google Scholar
• Brass , Paul . 1991 . Ethnicity and Nationalism. Theory and Comparison , New Delhi : Sage . Print
   Google Scholar
• Brassil, Eric. “Consociationalism and Its Limits: A Case Study of Iraq's Constitutional Configuration.” Diss. Central European U, 2006. Print
   Google Scholar
• Brusis , Martin . 2006 . Serbia and Montenegro: Democratic Consensus Susceptible to Populist Actors . Southeast European and Black Sea Studies , 6 ( 1 ) : 103 – 23 . Web. 19 April 2009
   Google Scholar
• Bunce , Valerie . 2003 . Rethinking Recent Democratization: Lessons from the Postcommunist Experience . World Politics , 55 ( 2 ) : 167 – 92 . Print
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunce , Valerie . 1999 . Subversive Institutions: The Design and the Destruction of Socialism and the State , Cambridge : Cambridge UP . Print
   Google Scholar
• Butenschen , Nils . 1985 . Conflict Management in Plural Societies: The Consociational Democracy Formula . Scandinavian Political Studies , 8 ( 1–2 ) : 85 – 103 . Print
   Google Scholar
• Caspersen , Nina . 2003 . Elite Interests and the Serbian-Montenegrin Conflict . Southeast European Politics , 4 ( 2–3 ) : 104 – 21 . Print
   Google Scholar
• Caspersen , Nina . 2004 . Good Fences Make Good Neighbors? A Comparison of Conflict Regulation Strategies in Post-War Bosnia . Journal of Peace Research , 41 ( 5 ) : 569 – 88 . Print
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEDEM. Department for Empirical Research. Public Opinion in Montenegro. Annual N° 2 (May 2005–April 2006). Podgorica, June 2006. Web. 2 May 2009.<http://www.cedem.cg.yu/publications/files/Godisnjak_2_eng.pdf>
   Google Scholar
• Cerović, Stojan. Serbia and Montenegro: Reintegration, Divorce or Something Else? Special Report, United States Institute for Peace, 2001. Web. 11 May 2009. <www.usip.org>
   Google Scholar
• Cohen , Lenard and Dragović-Soso, eds , Jasna . 2008 . State Collapse in South-Eastern Europe: New Perspectives on Yugoslavia's Disintegration , West Lafayette : Princeton UP . Print
   Google Scholar
• Constitutional Charter of the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro. Web. 21 April 2009. <http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/country,,NATLEGBOD,,SRB,43e7547d4,0.html>
   Google Scholar
• Cornell , Svante . 2002 . Autonomy as a Source of Conflict: Caucasian Conflicts in Theoretical Perspective . World Politics , 54 : 245 – 76 . Print
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daalder , Hans . 1974 . The Consociational Democracy Theme . World Politics , 26 ( 4 ) : 604 – 21 . Web. 27 April 2009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• “Distrust Between Opposing Montenegrin Blocs ‘Unparalleled’ in Europe-EU envoy.” SRNA, 2 Feb. 2006. Web. 13 May 2009
   Google Scholar
• Dix , Robert . 1980 . Consociational Democracy, the Case of Columbia . Comparative Politics , 12 ( 3 ) : 303 – 21 . Print
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durić , Dragan . 2004 . Montenegro's Prospects for European Integration: On a Twin-Track . South-East Europe Reviews , 4 : 79 – 106 . Web. 26 April 2009
   Google Scholar
• European Commission for Democracy Through Law (Venice Commission). Draft Opinion on the Compatibility of the Existing Legislation in Montenegro Concerning the Organization of Referendums With Applicable International Standards. Strasbourg: 2005. Web. 13 April 2009
   Google Scholar
• European Intelligence Unit. Serbia and Montenegro. Country Profile Main Report 2006. Web. 21 April 2009. <http://www.eiu.com/report_dl.asp? issue_id=1630225348&mode=pdf>
   Google Scholar
• Fearon , James and David , Laitin . 2004 . Ethnicity, Insurgency and Civil War . American Political Science Review , 97 : 75 – 90 . Print
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz , Donald . 1991 . A Democratic South Africa? Constitutional Engineering in a Divided Society , Berkeley : UCP . Print
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz , Donald . 1985 . Ethnic Groups in Conflict , Berkeley : UCP . Print
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz , Donald . 1981 . Patterns of Ethnic Separatism . Comparative Studies of Society and History , 23 ( 2 ) : 165 – 95 . Print
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House of Commons, Committee on Foreign Affairs. Montenegro. February 2005. Web. 18 April 2009. <http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200405/cmselect/cmfaff/87/8707.html>
   Google Scholar
• International Crisis Group (ICG). Montenegro Launches New Divorce Bid. Balkan Crisis Report 544. Podgorica: 2005
   Google Scholar
• International Crisis Group (ICG). Montenegro's Independence Drive. Europe Report 169. Podgorica/Belgrade/Brussels: 2005. Web. 19 April 2009
   Google Scholar
• International Crisis Group (ICG). Montenegro's Referendum. Europe Briefing 42. Podgorica/Belgrade/Brussels: 2006. Web. 19 April 2009
   Google Scholar
• International Crisis Group (ICG). Serbia's U-Turn. Europe Report 154. Belgrade/Brussels: 2004. Web. 19 April 2009
   Google Scholar
• International Crisis Group (ICG). Still Buying Time: Montenegro, Serbia and the European UnionBalkans Report 129. Podgorica/Belgrade/Brussels: 2002. Web. 19 April 2009
   Google Scholar
• Jenne , Erin . 2007 . Ethnic Bargaining: The Paradox of Minority Empowerment , Ithaca, NY : Cornell UP . Print
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Julie. Serbia and Montenegro Union: Background and Pending Dissolution. CRS Report for Congress. 24 May 2006. Web. 15 April 2009. <www.usembassy.it/pdf/other/RS21568.pdf>
   Google Scholar
• Kopecký , Petr . 2000 . “ From Velvet Revolution to Velvet Split ” . In Irreconcilable Differences?: Explaining Czechoslovakia's Dissolution Edited by: Kraus , Michael and Stanger , Allison . 69 – 86 . Print
   Google Scholar
• Kraus , Michael and Stanger, eds , Allison . 2000 . Irreconcilable Differences?: Explaining Czechoslovakia's Dissolution , Lanham, MD : Rowman & Littlefield . Print
   Google Scholar
• Law on the Implementation of the Constitutional Charter of the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro. 4 Feb. 2003. Official Gazette of Serbia and Montenegro, No 1, 2003. Web. 11 April 2009. <http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/43e7550b4.html>
   Google Scholar
• Lajčák, Miroslav. Personal Interview. 19 May 2009
   Google Scholar
• Lajčák, Miroslav. “Self-Determination and Territorial Integrity: Awkward Bedfellows.” Chatham House, London, United Kingdom, 20 April 2009. Speech (text version)
   Google Scholar
• Lederach , John Paul . 1997 . Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies , Washington, DC : US Institute of Peace . Print
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart , Arend . 1969 . Consociational Democracy . World Politics , 21 ( 2 ) : 207 – 25 . Print
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lijphart , Arend . 1975 . The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy in The Netherlands , Berkeley : UCP . Print
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart , Arend . 1977 . Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration , New Haven : Yale UP . Print
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart , Arend . 1999 . “ Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries ” . New Haven : Yale UP . Print
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart , Arend . 1985 . Power-Sharing in South Africa , Berkeley : Institute of International Studies, UCP . Print
   Google Scholar
• Linz , Juan and Stepan , Alfred . 1996 . Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation , Baltimore : Johns Hopkins UP . Print
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin , Daniel. Serbia Rejects Split from Montenegro . The Irish Times , 24 Feb 2005. Web. 11 May 2009
   Google Scholar
• “Montenegrin Opposition Firmly Opposed to Proposal to Alter Serbia and Montenegro Charter.” Radio Montenegro, 13 Feb. 2005. Web. 11 May 2009
   Google Scholar
• “Montenegrin Premier Urges Independence from Serbia to Boost EU, NATO Entry.” Die Presse 19 Sept. 2004. Web. 11 May 2009
   Google Scholar
• “Montenegro to be Independent ‘One Way or Another.’” Mina News Agency 24 Feb. 2005. Web. 11 May 2009
   Google Scholar
• Morrison , Kenneth . 2009 . Montenegro: A Modern History , London : I. B. Tauris . Print
   Google Scholar
• Musil , Jiří . 1995 . The End of Czechoslovakia , Edited by: Musil , Jiří . Budapest : CEU . Print
   Google Scholar
• Nordlinger , Eric . 1972 . Conflict Regulation in Divided Societies , Cambridge, MA : Center for International Affairs UP . Print
   Google Scholar
• OSCE/Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights. Referendum Observation Mission. 2006 Republic of Montenegro Serbia and Montenegro. Interim Report 2, 2006. Web. 16 April 2009. <http://www.osce.org/documents/odihr/2006/05/18982_en.pdf>
   Google Scholar
• OSCE/Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights. Referendum Observation Mission. Final Report. Web. 16 April 2009.<http://www.osce.org/documents/odihr/2006/08/20077_en.pdf>
   Google Scholar
• “Our Election Proposal Satisfies Both Sides – Serbian Premier's Adviser.” Dan 1 Feb. 2005. Web. 16 May 2009
   Google Scholar
• Pappalardo , Adriano . 1981 . The Conditions For Consociational Democracy: A Logical and Empirical Critique . European Journal of Political Research , 9 ( 4 ) : 365 – 390 . Web. 12 May 2009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skalnik-Leff , Carol . 1997 . The Czech and Slovak Republic: Nation Versus State , Boulder : WP . Print
   Google Scholar
• Skalnik-Leff , Carol . 1999 . Democratization and Disintegration in Multinational States . World Politics , 51 ( 2 ) : 205 – 35 . Print
   Google Scholar
• Skalnik-Leff, Carol. “Inevitability, Probability, Possibility: The Legacies of the Czech-Slovak Relationship, 1918–1989, and the Disintegration of the State.” Irreconcilable. Eds. Michael Kraus and Allison Stanger. 2000. 29–48. Print
   Google Scholar
• Skalnik-Leff , Carol and Mikula , B. 2002 . Institutionalizing Party Systems in Multiethnic States: Integration and Ethnic Segmentation in Czechoslovakia 1918–1992 . Slavic Review , 61 ( 2 ) : 292 – 314 . Print
   Google Scholar
• Steiner , Jürg . 1981 . Research Strategies Beyond Consociational Theory . The Journal of Politics , 43 ( 4 ) : 1241 – 1250 . Web. 10 April 2009
   Google Scholar
• Van Meurs, Wim. “The Belgrade Agreement: Robust Mediation between Serbia and Montenegro.” Bieber, ed. Transition. 63–82. Print.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Berghe , Pierre L . 1981 . The Ethnic Phenomenon , New York : Elsevier . Print
   Google Scholar
• Van Schendelen . 1984 . The Views of Arend Lijphart and Collected Criticisms . Acta Politica , 19 : 19 – 55 . Print
   Google Scholar
• WRITENET. FRY: Persistent Crisis Challenges the UN System. 1 August 1998. Web. 29 April 2009. <http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/3ae6a6be4.html>
   Google Scholar
• “WTO Approves Accession Process for Serbia, Montenegro on Separate Requests.” Radio B92 text web site. 15 Feb. 2005. Web. 11 May 2009
   Google Scholar
• Žák , Václav . The Velvet Divorce – Institutional Foundations . The End of Czechoslovakia , Ed. Musil. 245–68. Print
   Google Scholar