Publication Cover
Nationalities Papers
The Journal of Nationalism and Ethnicity
Volume 42, 2014 - Issue 2
629
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Whose land is it? Land reform, minorities, and the titular “nation” in Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, and Tajikistan

&
Pages 336-354 | Received 28 Feb 2013, Accepted 06 Aug 2013, Published online: 18 Mar 2014

References

  • Acemoglu, Daron, and James A. Robinson. 2006. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Albertus, Michael. 2012. “Vote Buying With Multiple Distributive Goods.” Comparative Political Studies 46 (9): 1082–1111.
  • Allina-Pisano, Jessica. 2004. “Sub Rosa Resistance and the Politics of Economic Reform: Land Redistribution in Post-Soviet Ukraine.” World Politics 56 (4): 554–581. doi: 10.1353/wp.2005.0001
  • Allina-Pisano, Jessica. 2008. The Post-Soviet Potemkin Village: Politics and Property Rights in the Black Earth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Babak, Vladimir, Demian Vaisman, and Aryeh Wasserman. 2004. Political Organization in Central Asia and Azerbijan: Sources and Documents. London: Frank Cass.
  • Baland, Jean-Marie, and James A. Robinson. 2012. “The Political Value of Land: Political Reform and Land Prices in Chile.” American Journal of Political Science 56 (3): 601–619. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00585.x
  • Bloch, Peter C. 2002. “Kyrgyzstan: Almost Done, What Next?” Problems of Post Communism 49 (1): 53–62.
  • Bohr, Annette. 1998. “The Central Asian States as Nationalizing Regimes.” In Nation-Building in Post-Soviet Borderlands: The Politics of National Identities, edited by Vivien Law Graham Smith, Andrew Wilson, Annette Bohr and Edward Allworth, 139–166. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Boix, Carles. 2003. Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bonnenfant, Isik Kuscu. 2012. “Constructing the Homeland: Kazakhstan's Discourse and Policies Surrounding its Ethnic Return-migration Policy.” Central Asian Survey 31 (1): 31–44. doi: 10.1080/02634937.2012.650004
  • Boone, Catherine. 2007. “Property and Constitutional Order: Land Tenure Reform and the Future of the African State.” African Affairs 106 (425): 557–586. doi: 10.1093/afraf/adm059
  • Boone, Catherine. 2009. “Electoral Populism Where Property Rights Are Weak: Land Politics in Contemporary Sub-Saharan Africa.” Comparative Politics 41 (2): 183–201. doi: 10.5129/001041509X12911362971990
  • Boone, Catherine. 2011. “Politically Allocated Land Rights and the Geography of Electoral Violence: The Case of Kenya in the 1990s.” Comparative Political Studies 44 (10): 1311–1342. doi: 10.1177/0010414011407465
  • Boone, Catherine, and Norma Kriger. 2010. “Multiparty Elections and Land Patronage: Zimbabwe and Cote d'Ivoire.” Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 48 (2): 173–202. doi: 10.1080/14662041003672502
  • Brubaker, Rogers. 1996. Nationalism Reframed: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Brubaker, Rogers. 2011. “Nationalizing States Revisited: Projects and Processes of Nationalization in Post-Soviet States.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 34 (11): 1785–1814. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2011.579137
  • Chakravorty, Sanjoy. 2013. The Price of Land: Acquisition, Conflict, Consequence. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
  • Collins, Kathleen. 2006. Clan Politics and Regime Transition in Central Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Commercio, Michele E. 2010. Russian Minority Politics in Post-Soviet Latvia and Kyrgyzstan: The Transformative Power of Informal Networks. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Dercon, Stefan, and Roxana Gutierrez-Romero. 2012. “Triggers and Characteristics of the 2007 Kenyan Electoral Violence.” World Development 40 (4): 731–744. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.09.015
  • Driscoll, Jesse. 2009. “Exiting Anarchy: Militia Politics after the Post-Soviet Wars.” PhD diss., Stanford University.
  • Dudwick, Nora, Karin Fock, and David J. Sedik. 2007. Land Reform and Farm Restructuring in Transition Countries: The Experience of Bulgaria, Moldova, Azerbaijan, and Kazakhstan. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Gaisina, Sholpan. 2011. “Credit Policies for Kazakhstani Agriculture.” Central Asian Survey 30 (2): 257–274. doi: 10.1080/02634937.2011.565228
  • Gellner, Ernest. 1983. Nations and Nationalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • George, Alexander L., and Andrew Bennett. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Gleason, Gregory. 1992. Land Reform in the New States of Central Asia. Washington, DC: National Council for Soviet and East European Research.
  • Green, Elliott D. 2006. “Ethnicity and the Politics of Land Tenure Reform in Central Uganda.” Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 44 (3): 370–388. doi: 10.1080/14662040600997148
  • Hale, Henry E. 2009. “Cause Without a Rebel: Kazakhstan's Unionist Nationalism in the USSR and CIS.” Nationalities Papers 37 (1): 1–32. doi: 10.1080/00905990802373603
  • Hierman, Brent. 2010. “What Use Was the Election to Us? Clientelism and Political Trust Amongst Ethnic Uzbeks in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan.” Nationalities Papers 38 (2): 245–263. doi: 10.1080/00905990903517850
  • Huskey, Eugene. 1997. “Kyrgyzstan: The Fate of Political Liberalization.” In Conflict, Cleavage, and Change in Central Asia and the Caucasus, edited by Karen Dawisha and Bruce Parrott, 242–276. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Jones, Kevin D. 2004. “Land Privatization and Conflict in Central Asia: Is Kyrgyzstan a Model?” In In the Tracks of Tamerlane: Central Asia's Path to the 21st Century, edited by Daniel L. Burghart and Theresa Sabonis-Helf, 259–273. Washington, DC: National Defense University, Center for Technology and National Security Policy.
  • Jones Luong, Pauline. 2002. Institutional Change and Political Continuity in Post-Soviet Central Asia: Power, Perceptions, and Pacts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Joshi, Madhav, and T. David Mason. 2008. “Between Democracy and Revolution: Peasant Support for Insurgency versus Democracy in Nepal.” Journal of Peace Research 45 (6): 765–782. doi: 10.1177/0022343308096155
  • Joshi, Madhav, and T. David Mason. 2011. “Peasants, Patrons, and Parties: The Tension Between Clientelism and Democracy in Nepal1.” International Studies Quarterly 55 (1): 151–175. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2010.00639.x
  • Kramon, Eric, and Daniel N. Posner. 2013. “Who Benefits from Distributive Politics? How the Outcome One Studies Affects the Answer One Gets.” Perspectives on Politics 11 (2): 461–474. doi: 10.1017/S1537592713001035
  • Laruelle, Marlene. 2007. “The Return of the Aryan Myth: Tajikistan in Search of a Secularized National Ideology.” Nationalities Papers 35 (1): 51–70. doi: 10.1080/00905990601124462
  • Laruelle, Marlene. 2012. “The Paradigm of Nationalism in Kyrgyzstan. Evolving Narrative, The Sovereignty Issue, and Political Agenda.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 45 (1–2): 39–49. doi: 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2012.02.002
  • Lerman, Zvi, and David Sedik. 2009. Agrarian Reform in Kyrgyzstan: Achievements and the Unfinished Agenda. Policy Studies on Rural Transition No. 2009-1. Budapest: FAO Regional Office for Europe and Central Asia.
  • Magaloni, Beatriz. 2006. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Marat, Erica. 2008. “Imagined Past, Uncertain Future: The Creation of National Ideologies in Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan.” Problems of Post-Communism 55 (1): 12–24. doi: 10.2753/PPC1075-8216550102
  • McGlinchey, Eric M. 2011. Chaos, Violence, Dynasty: Politics and Islam in Central Asia. Pittsburgh, PA.: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Megoran, Nick. 2012. Averting Violence in Kyrgyzstan: Understanding and Responding to Nationalism. Russia and Eurasia Programme Paper. London: Chatham House.
  • Mudahar, Mohinder S. 1998. Kyrgyz Republic: Strategy for Rural Growth and Poverty Alleviation. World Bank Discussion Paper. Washington, DC: World Bank, Rural Development and Environment Unit, Europe and Central Asia Region.
  • Nakaya, Sumie. 2009. “Aid and Transition from a War Economy to an Oligarchy in Post-War Tajikistan.” Central Asian Survey 28 (3): 259–273. doi: 10.1080/02634930903421764
  • Olcott, Martha Brill. 1997. “Democratization and the Growth of Political Participation in Kazakhstan.” In Conflict, Cleavage, and Change in Central Asia and the Caucasus, edited by Karen Dawisha and Bruce Parrott, 201–241. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Radnitz, Scott. 2010. Weapons of the Wealthy: Predatory Regimes and Elite-led Protests in Central Asia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Ronsijn, Wouter. 2006. Coping During Transition in Rural Areas: The Case of Post-Soviet Southern Kyrgyzstan. Conflict Research Group Working Paper (4). Ghent, BE: Conflict Research Group, Ghent University.
  • Roy, Olivier. 2000. The New Central Asia: The Creation of Nations. New York: New York University Press.
  • Sanghera, Balihar, and Elmira Satybaldieva. 2012. “Ethics of Property, Illegal Settlements and the Right to Subsistence.” International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy32 (1/2): 96–114. doi: 10.1108/01443331211201798
  • Sarsembayev, Azamat. 1999. “Imagined Communities: Kazak nationalism and Kazakification in the 1990s.” Central Asian Survey 18 (3): 319–346. doi: 10.1080/02634939995605
  • Schatz, Edward A. D. 2000. “Framing Strategies and Non-conflict in Multi-Ethnic Kazakhstan.” Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 6 (2): 71–94. doi: 10.1080/13537110008428596
  • Smith, Anthony D. 2009. Ethno-Symbolism and Nationalism: A Cultural Approach. London: Routledge.
  • Spector, Regine A. 2004. “The Transformation of Askar Akaev, President of Kyrgyzstan”. Working Paper Series: Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies.
  • Swinnen, Johan F. M. 1997. “The Choice of Privatization and Decollectivization Policies in Central and Eastern European Agriculture: Observations and Political Economy Hypotheses.” In Political Economy of Agrarian Reform in Central and Eastern Europe, edited by Johan F. M. Swinnen, 363–398. Brookfield, Vermont: Ashgate.
  • Swinnen, Johan F. M. 1999. “The Political Economy of Land Reform Choices in Central and Eastern Europe.” The Economics of Transition 7 (3): 637–664. doi: 10.1111/1468-0351.00029
  • Toft, Monica Duffy. 2003. The Geography of Ethnic Violence: Identity, Interests, and the Indivisibility of Territory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • UNECE (United Nations Economic Commission for Europe). 2010. Country Profiles on the Housing Section – Kyrgyzstan. New York: UNECE Information Service.
  • USAID (United States Agency for International Development). 2005a. Assessment of the Implementation of the Interim Provisions, Land Code in Kazakhstan: Final Report. Washington, DC: United States Agency for International Development.
  • USAID (United States Agency for International Development). 2005b. Land Tenure and Property Rights Assessment for Kyrgyzstan. Washington, DC: United States Agency for International Development.
  • USAID (United States Agency for International Development). 2011. USAID Country Profile: Kyrgyzstan- Property Rights and Resource Governance. Washington, DC: United States Agency for International Development.
  • Verdery, Katherine. 2003. The Vanishing Hectare : Property and Value in Postsocialist Transylvania. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • World Bank. 2012. Farmer and Farm Worker Perceptions of Land Reform and Sustainable Agriculture in Tajikistan. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Zakon KR o gosudarstvennykh garantiiakh etnicheskim kyrgyzam, vozvrashchaiushchimsia na istoricheskuiu rodinu [The Law of the KR on State Guarantees for Ethnic Kyrgyz Returning to their Historical Homeland]. Passed in the Jogorku Kenesh on October 10, 2007; Amended July 18, 2008 (No 157).
  • Ziblatt, Daniel. 2008. “Does Landholding Inequality Block Democratization? A Test of the ‘Bread and Democracy’ Thesis and the Case of Prussia.” World Politics 60 (4): 610–641. doi: 10.1353/wp.0.0021
  • Ziblatt, Daniel. 2009. “Shaping Democratic Practice and the Causes of Electoral Fraud: The Case of Nineteenth-Century Germany.” American Political Science Review 103 (1): 1–21. doi: 10.1017/S0003055409090042

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.