From “frozen conflict” to enduring rivalry: reassessing the Nagorny Karabakh conflict

References

• Alieva, Leila, ed. 2013. The Soviet Legacy 22 Years on: Reversed or Reinforced? Baku: Qanun.
   Google Scholar
• ArmeniaNow. 2013. “Maine Becomes Third U.S. State to Recognize NKR's Independence.” www.armenianow.com/karabakh/45228/armenia_karabakh_united_states_maine_recognition.
   Google Scholar
• Asbarez. 2013. “Louisiana State Senate Recognizes Karabakh Independence.” http://asbarez.com/110347/louisiana-state-senate-recognizes-karabakh-independence/.
   Google Scholar
• Aslanov, Bakhtiyar. 2013. “Azerbaijan and Armenia Stockpile New Weapons.” Central Asia and Caucasus Analyst, October 30. www.cacianalyst.org/publications/field-reports/item/12841-azerbaijan-and-armenia-stockpile-new-weapons.html.
   Google Scholar
• Asmus, Ronald. 2010. A Little War that Shook the World: Georgia, Russia, and the Future of the West. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bennet, D. Scott. 1997. “Measuring Rivalry Termination 1816–1992.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (2): 227–254. doi: 10.1177/0022002797041002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolukbasi, Suha. 2011. Azerbaijan. A Political History. London: I.B. Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Bremer, Stuart. 1992. “Dangerous Dyads: Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Interstate War, 1816–1965.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 36 (2): 309–341. doi: 10.1177/0022002792036002005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broers, Laurence. 2014. “Nagorno-Karabakh's Summer of Violence.” Feature Report. World Politics Review.
   Google Scholar
• Broers, Laurence and Gerard Toal. 2013. “Cartographic Exhibitionism? Visualizing the Territory of Armenian and Karabakh.” Problems of Post-Communism 60 (3): 16–35. doi: 10.2753/PPC1075-8216600302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caucasian Knot. 2014. “In 2014 Azerbaijan Already has Fourth Suicide Committed by Soldier.” Accessed January 16, 2014. http://eng.kavkaz-uzel.ru/articles/26947/.
   Google Scholar
• Cheterian, Vicken. 2008. War and Peace in the Caucasus. Russia's Troubled Frontier. London: Hurst.
   Google Scholar
• Conciliation Resources. 2005. The Limits of Leadership: Elites and Societies in the Nagorny Karabakh Peace Process. Accord 17. London: Conciliation Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Conciliation Resources. 2011a. Forced Displacement in the Nagorny Karabakh Conflict: Return and its Alternatives. London: Conciliation Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Conciliation Resources. 2011b. Individual Rights, Societal Choices: Confronting Legacies of Displacement in the Nagorny Karabakh Conflict. London: Conciliation Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Conciliation Resources. 2012. Beyond Exclusion: Rethinking Approaches to Status in the Nagorny Karabakh Peace Process. London: Conciliation Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Cornell, Svante. 2001. Small Nations and Great Powers. A Study of Ethnopolitical Conflict in the Caucasus. Richmond: Curzon.
   Google Scholar
• Croissant, Michael, P. 1998. The Armenia-Azerbaijan Conflict. Causes and Implications. Westport: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Deriglazova, Larisa and Sergey Minasyan. 2011. Nagorno-Karabakh: The Paradoxes of Strength and Weakness in an Asymmetric Conflict. Yerevan: Caucasus Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Diehl, Paul, F., ed. 1998. The Dynamics of Enduring Rivalries. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diehl, Paul F., and Gary Goertz. 2000. War and Peace in International Rivalry. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Foreign Office. 2009. Conflict in Post-Soviet Europe. The South Caucasus: Are there Scenarios for Resolution? The 2009 Berlin Roundtable on Diplomacy. Berlin: Auswärtiges Amt.
   Google Scholar
• Freizer, Sabine. 2014. “Twenty Years after the Nagorny Karabakh Ceasefire: An Opportunity to Move towards More Inclusive Conflict Resolution.” Caucasus Survey 1 (2): 109–122. doi: 10.1080/23761199.2014.11417295
   Google Scholar
• Giragosian, Richard. 2013. Cause for Concern: The Shifting Balance of Power in the South Caucasus. Yerevan: Regional Studies Center.
   Google Scholar
• Giragosian, Richard. 2014a. Nagorno Karabakh. Situational Assessment. Yerevan: Regional Studies Center.
   Google Scholar
• Giragosian, Richard. 2014b. Nagorno Karabakh. Situational Assessment. Yerevan: Regional Studies Center.
   Google Scholar
• Goertz, Gary and Paul Diehl. 1993. “Enduring Rivalries: Theoretical Constructs and Empirical Patterns.” International Studies Quarterly 37 (2): 147–171. doi: 10.2307/2600766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goertz, Gary, Bradford Jones, and Paul F. Diehl. 2005. “Maintenance Processes in International Rivalries.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 49 (5): 742–769. doi: 10.1177/0022002705279375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grigoryan, Armen. 2014. “Armenia: Joining Under the Gun.” In Putin's Grand Strategy: The Eurasian Union and its Discontents, edited by S. Frederick Starr and Svante E. Cornell, 98–109. Washington, DC: Central Asia and Caucasus Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Gureyeva-Alieva, Yulia and Tabib Huseynov. 2011. Can You Be an IDP for 20 Years?” A Comparative Field Study on the Protection Needs and Attitudes towards Displacement among IDPs and Host Communities in Azerbaijan. Baku: Brookings Institute/London School of Economics Project on Internal Displacement.
   Google Scholar
• Hakobyan, Tatul. 2010. Karabakh Diary: Green and Black. Antelias.
   Google Scholar
• Hassner, Ron E. 2006–2007. “The Path to Intractability: Time and the Entrenchment of Territorial Disputes.” International Security 31 (3): 107–138. doi: 10.1162/isec.2007.31.3.107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hensel, Paul R. 1999. “An Evolutionary Approach to the Study of Interstate Rivalry.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 17 (12): 175–206. doi: 10.1177/073889429901700203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtom, Paul. 2012. “Arms Transfers to Armenia and Azerbaijan, 2007–11.” In Stockholm International Peace Research Institute Yearbook 2012, Armaments, Disarmament and International Security, edited by Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, 286–292. Oxford: Oxford University Press on behalf of Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• HRW (Human Rights Watch). 2012–2014. “ World Report.” www.hrw.org/publications.
   Google Scholar
• Huseynov, Tabib. 2010. “Mountainous Karabakh: New Paradigms for Peace and Development in the 21st Century.” International Negotiation 15: 7–31. doi: 10.1163/157180610X488164
   Google Scholar
• Huseynov, Tabib. 2011. “Return and Its Alternatives: A Case Study on the Armenian-Azerbaijani Conflict.” In Forced Displacement in the Nagorny Karabakh Conflict: Return and its Alternatives, edited by Conciliation Resources, 33–46. London: Conciliation Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Huth, Paul K. 1998. Standing Your Ground. Territorial Disputes and International Conflict. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• International Alert. 2013. Advancing the Prospects for Peace: 20 years of Peacebuilding in the Context of the Nagorny Karabakh Conflict. London: International Alert.
   Google Scholar
• International Crisis Group. 2007. “ Nagorno-Karabakh: Risking War.” Europe Report No.187.
   Google Scholar
• International Crisis Group. 2011. “ Armenia and Azerbaijan: Preventing War.” Europe Briefing No. 60.
   Google Scholar
• International Crisis Group. 2013. “ Armenia and Azerbaijan: A Season of Risks.” Europe Briefing No. 71.
   Google Scholar
• IWPR (Institute for War and Peace Reporting). 2011. “Armenian Army Non-Combat Deaths Probed.” http://iwpr.net/report-news/armenian-army-non-combat-deaths-probed.
   Google Scholar
• Kameck, Michael and Sargis Ghazaryan, eds. 2013. Europe's Next Avoidable War: Nagorno-Karabakh. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kazimirov, V. N. 2009. Mir Karabakhu. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye Otnoshcheniia.
   Google Scholar
• Kucera, Joshua. 2013. “Azerbaijan Looking for Weapons in South Korea?” Eurasianet, August 27. www.eurasianet.org/node/67438
   Google Scholar
• Leng, Russell J. 1983. “When Will they Ever Learn? Coercive Bargaining in Recurrent Crises.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 27 (3): 379–419. doi: 10.1177/0022002783027003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leng, Russell J. 2000. Bargaining and Learning in Recurring Crises. The Soviet-American, Egyptian-Israeli and Indo-Pakistan Rivalries. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leng, Russell J. 2005. “Realpolitik and Learning in the India-Pakistan Rivalry.” In The India-Pakistan Conflict. An Enduring Rivalry, edited by T. V. Paul, 103–127. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• LINKS (London Information Network on Conflicts and State-building). 2010. Karabakh. The Big Debate. Parts 1 and 2. London: LINKS.
   Google Scholar
• Maoz, Zeev, and Ben D. Mor. 2002. Bound by Struggle. The Strategic Evolution of Enduring International Rivalries. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maresca, John J. 1996. “Lost Opportunities in Negotiating the Conflict over Nagorno Karabakh.” International Negotiation 1: 471–499. doi: 10.1163/157180696X00188
   Google Scholar
• Mesbahi, Mohiaddin. 2013. “Islam and Security Narratives in Eurasia.” Caucasus Survey 1 (1): 5–26. doi: 10.1080/23761199.2013.11417281
   Google Scholar
• Military Balance. 2014. The Military Balance: The Annual Assessment of Global Military Capabilities and Defence Economics. London: International Institute for Strategic Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Minasyan, Sergey. 2010. Nagorno-Karabakh After Two Decades of Conflict: Is Prolongation of the Status Quo Inevitable? Yerevan: Caucasus Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Morar, Filon. 2010. “Frozen Conflicts: Transcending Illusive Dilemmas.” Per Concordiam 1 (2): 10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Oskanian, Kevork. 2013. Fear, Weakness and Power in the Post-Soviet South Caucasus. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Oskanian, Kevork. 2014a. “Nationalism Sparks a Summer of Deadly Violence In the Caucasus.” The Conversation, August 28. http://theconversation.com/nationalism-sparks-a-summer-of-deadly-violence-in-the-caucasus-30933.
   Google Scholar
• Oskanian, Vartan. 2014b. “Will Armenia and Azerbaijan Reach a Negotiated Settlement?” Al-Jazeera, August 10.
   Google Scholar
• Ó Tuathail, Gearóid, and Simon Dalby. 1998. “Introduction: Rethinking Geopolitics. Towards a Critical Geopolitics.” In Rethinking Geopolitics, edited by Gearóid Ó. Tuathail and Simon Dalby, 1–15. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Özkan, Behlül. 2008. “Who Gains from the ‘No war, No Peace’ Situation? A Critical Analysis of the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict.” Geopolitics 13 (3): 572–599. doi: 10.1080/14650040802203919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panossian, Razmik. 2006. The Armenians. From Kings and Priests to Merchants and Commissars. London: Hurst.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, T.V., ed. 2005a. The India-Pakistan Conflict: An Enduring Rivalry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, T.V., ed. 2005b. “Causes of the India-Pakistan Enduring Rivalry.” In The India-Pakistan Conflict: An Enduring Rivalry, edited by T. V. Paul, 3–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, T.V., ed. 2006. “Why has the India-Pakistan Rivalry been So Enduring? Power Asymmetry and an Intractable Conflict.” Security Studies 15 (4): 600–630. doi: 10.1080/09636410601184595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popescu, Nicu. 2013. “ Behind – and Beyond – Armenia's Choice.” European Union Institute for Security Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Ramet, Sabrina P. 2004. “Explaining the Yugoslav Meltdown, 1. ‘For a Charm of Powerful Trouble, Like a Hell-Broth Boil and Bubble’: Theories about the Roots of the Yugoslav Troubles.” Nationalities Papers 32 (4): 731–763. doi: 10.1080/0090599042000296171
   Google Scholar
• Rasler, Karen, William R. Thompson, and Sumit Ganguly. 2013. How Rivalries End. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saferworld. 2012. Putting People First. Reducing Frontline Tensions in Armenia and Azerbaijan, Nagorny Karabakh. London: Saferworld.
   Google Scholar
• Saparov, Arsène. 2012. “Why Autonomy? The making of Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Region 1918–1925.” Europe-Asia Studies 64 (2): 281–323. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2011.642583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheets, Lawrence Scott. 2012. “A ‘Frozen Conflict’ that Could Boil Over.” New York Times, March 8.
   Google Scholar
• Slaq.am. 2013. “John Kerry Pledges to Help end Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict.” June 4. Accessed February 20, 2014. www.slaq.am/eng/news/136460/.
   Google Scholar
• Souleimanov, Emil. 2013. Understanding Ethnopolitical Conflict. Karabakh, South Ossetia, and Abkhazia Wars Reconsidered. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Stinnet, Douglas M., and Paul F. Diehl. 2001. “The Path(S) to Rivalry: Behavioral and Structural Explanations of Rivalry Development.” Journal of Politics 63 (3): 717–740. doi: 10.1111/0022-3816.00085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tir, Jaroslav, and Paul F. Diehl. 2002. “Geographic Dimensions of Enduring Rivalries.” Political Geography 21: 263–286. doi: 10.1016/S0962-6298(01)00059-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tokluoglu, Ceylan. 2011. “The Political Discourse of the Azerbaijani Elite on the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict (1991–2009).” Europe-Asia Studies 63 (7): 1223–1252. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2011.592272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay, Reeta Chowdhari, and Julian Schofield. 2005. “Institutional Causes of the India-Pakistan Rivalry.” In The India-Pakistan Conflict. An Enduring Rivalry, edited by T. V. Paul, 225–248. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vasquez, John A. 1996. “Distinguishing Rivals that Go to War from Those That Do Not.” International Studies Quarterly 40 (4): 531–558. doi: 10.2307/2600890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasquez, John A. 2005. “The India-Pakistan Conflict in Light of General Theories of War, Rivalry, and Deterrence.” In The India-Pakistan Conflict. An Enduring Rivalry, edited by T. V. Paul, 54–79. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vasquez, John A., and Marie T. Henehan. 2011. Territory, War, and Peace. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• de Waal, Thomas. 2013. Black Garden. Armenia and Azerbaijan through Peace and War, 2nd ed. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, Edward W. 1998. No Peace, No War in the Caucasus: Secessionist Conflicts in Chechnya, Abkhazia and Nagorno-Karabakh. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University John F. Kennedy School of Government.
   Google Scholar
• Weisskopf Bleill, Laura. 2005–2006. “Enduring rivalries.” LASNews, Fall/Winter; www.las.illinois.edu/alumni/magazine/articles/2005/enduringrivalries/.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, Stefan, and Annemarie Peen Rodt. 2013. “Self-Determination after Kosovo.” Europe-Asia Studies 65 (5): 799–822. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2013.792450
   Google Scholar
• Zolyan, Mikayel. 2009. “Karabakh 2014 Scenarios.” In Karabakh 2014. Six Analysts on the Future of the Nagorny Karabakh Peace Process, edited by Conciliation Resources, 48–53. London: Conciliation Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Zürcher, Christoph. 2007. The Post-Soviet Wars. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar