Accountability of minority representation: methodological advancements

References

• Almairac, Laure. 2006. Turkey: A Minority Policy of Systematic Negation (Report). Vienna: International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, Karen. 2014. “Ethnic Quotas and Ethnic Representation Worldwide.” International Political Science Review 35 (1): 12–26. doi: 10.1177/0192512113507798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bochsler, Daniel. 2010. “Electoral Rules and the Representation of Ethnic Minorities in Post-communist Democracies.” European Yearbook of Minority Issues 2007/8 7: 153–180. doi: 10.1163/22116117-90001632
   Google Scholar
• Bochsler, Daniel, and Edina Szöcsik. 2013. “Building Inter-ethnic Bridges or Promoting Ethno-territorial Demarcation Lines? Hungarian Minority Parties in Competition.” Nationalities Papers 41 (5): 761–779. doi: 10.1080/00905992.2013.801411
   Google Scholar
• Brito Vieira, Monica, and David Runciman. 2008. Representation, Key Concepts. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Brubaker, Rogers. 2002. “Ethnicity Without Groups.” European Journal of Sociology 43 (02): 163–189. doi: 10.1017/S0003975602001066
   Google Scholar
• Brubaker, Rogers. 2004. Ethnicity Without Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bullock, Charles S. 1995. “The Impact of Changing the Racial Composition of Congressional Districts on Legislators’ Roll Call Behavior.” American Politics Quarterly 23 (2): 141–158. doi: 10.1177/1532673X9502300202
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Judith. 1999. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Canon, David T. 1999. Race, Redistricting, and Representation: The Unintended Consequences of Black Majority Districts. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carstocea, Andrea E. 2011. “Ethno-business – the Manipulation of Minority Rights in Romania and Hungary.” In Perpetual Motion? Transformation and Transition in Central and Eastern Europe & Russia, edited by Tul’si Bhambry, Clare Griffin, Titus Hjelm, Christopher Nicholson, and Olga G. Voronina, 16–28. London: School of Slavonic and East European Studies, UCL.
   Google Scholar
• Cârstocea, Andreea. 2013. “Accountability and Political Representation of National Minorities: A Forgotten Link? Evidence from Romania.” Working Paper 65. Flensburg: European Centre for Minority Issues.
   Google Scholar
• Cianetti, Licia. 2014. “Representing Minorities in the City. Education Policies and Minority Incorporation in the Capital Cities of Estonia and Latvia.” Nationalities Papers 42 (6): 981–1001. doi: 10.1080/00905992.2014.957663
   Google Scholar
• Disch, Lisa. 2011. “Toward a Mobilization Conception of Democratic Representation.” American Political Science Review 105 (1): 100–114. doi: 10.1017/S0003055410000602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Disch, Lisa. 2015. “The ‘Constructivist Turn’ in Democratic Representation: A Normative Dead-End?” Constellations 22 (4): 487–499. doi: 10.1111/1467-8675.12201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamble, Katrina L. 2007. “Black Political Representation: An Examination of Legislative Activity within U.S. House Committees.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 32 (3): 421–447. doi: 10.3162/036298007781699663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannetti, Daniela, and Andrea Pedrazzani. 2013. “Rules and Speeches: How Parliamentary Rules Affect Speech Making Behaviour.” The Third Annual General Conference of the European Political Science Association (EPSA), Parlament de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Grofman, Bernard, ed. 1998. Race and Redistricting in the 1990s. New York: Agathon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haynie, Kerry L. 2001. African American Legislators in the American States. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Htun, Mala. 2004. “Is Gender Like Ethnicity? The Political Representation of Identity Groups.” Perspectives on Politics 2 (3): 439–458. doi: 10.1017/S1537592704040241
   Google Scholar
• King, Ronald F., and Cosmin Gabriel Marian. 2012. “Minority Representation and Reserved Legislative Seats in Romania.” East European Politics and Societies 26 (3): 561–588. doi: 10.1177/0888325412441493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lončar, Jelena. 2016. “Electoral Accountability and Substantive Representation of National Minorities: The Case of Serbia.” East European Politics & Societies, 30 (4): 703–724. doi: 10.1177/0888325416650252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lončar, Jelena, and Boban Stojanović. 2015. “Electoral Campaigns in Serbia from 2000 to 2014.” In How to Make Intraparty Democracy Possible? Institutional Factors and Internal Dynamics of Intra-Party Relations, edited by Zoran Stojiljković, Dušan Spasojević, and Jelena Lončar, 87–110. Belgrade: Faculty of Political Science and CEMI.
   Google Scholar
• Lublin, David Ian. 1997. Paradox of Representation: Gerrymandering and Minority Interests in Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, Jane. 2003. “Rethinking Representation.” American Political Science Review 97 (4): 515–528. doi: 10.1017/S0003055403000856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, Jane. 2011. “Clarifying the Concept of Representation.” American Political Science Review 105 (3): 621–630. doi: 10.1017/S0003055411000189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minta, Michael D. 2011. Oversight: Representing the Interests of Blacks and Latinos in Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Minta, Michael D., and Valeria Sinclair-Chapman. 2013. “Diversity in Political Institutions and Congressional Responsiveness to Minority Interests.” Political Research Quarterly 66 (1): 127–140. doi: 10.1177/1065912911431245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montanaro, Laura. 2012. “The Democratic Legitimacy of Self-appointed Representatives.” The Journal of Politics 74 (04): 1094–1107. doi: 10.1017/S0022381612000515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nacionalni savet mađarske nacionalne manjine. 2011. Medijska strategija vojvođanskih Mađara 2011–2016 [The Media Strategy of Vojvodina Hungarians 2011–2016]. Subotica: Nacionalni savet mađarske nacionalne manjine.
   Google Scholar
• Nakao, Keisuke. 2011. “Racial Redistricting for Minority Representation Without Partisan Bias: A Theoretical Approach.” Economics & Politics 23 (1): 132–151. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0343.2010.00379.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, Helene Helboe. 2012a. “Policy-seeking Parties in Multiparty Systems: Influence or Purity?” Party Politics 18 (3): 297–314. doi: 10.1177/1354068810382940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, Helene Helboe. 2012b. “What Do Parties Want? Policy Versus Office.” West European Politics 35 (4): 896–910. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2012.682350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, Anne. 1994. “Dealing with Difference: A Politics of Ideas or a Politics of Presence?” Constellations 1 (1): 74–91. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8675.1994.tb00005.x
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence, Oxford Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Protsyk, Oleh, Marius Matichescu, and Baptiste Chatre. 2008. “Representational Consequences of Special Mechanisms for Ethnic Minority Inclusion: Evidence from Romania.” ECMI Working Paper 41. Flensburg: European Centre for Minority Issues (ECMI).
   Google Scholar
• Protsyk, Oleh, and Konstantin Sachariew. 2012. “Recruitment and Representation of Ethnic Minorities under Proportional Representation: Evidence from Bulgaria.” East European Politics & Societies 26 (2): 313–339. doi: 10.1177/0888325410364672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahat, Gideon, and Reuven Y. Hazan. 2001. “Candidate Selection Methods: An Analytical Framework.” Party Politics 7 (3): 297–322. doi: 10.1177/1354068801007003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saward, Michael. 2006. “The Representative Claim.” Contemporary Political Theory 5 (3): 297–318. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300234
   Google Scholar
• Saward, Michael. 2010. The Representative Claim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saward, Michael. 2014. “Shape-shifting Representation.” American Political Science Review 108 (4): 723–736. doi: 10.1017/S0003055414000471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarrow, Susan. 2005. Political Parties and Democracy in Theoretical and Practical Perspectives: Implementing Intra-party Democracy. Washington, DC: National Democratic Institute for International Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Severs, Eline. 2010. “Representation as Claims-making. Quid Responsiveness?” Representation 46 (4): 411–423. doi: 10.1080/00344893.2010.518081
   Google Scholar
• Shomer, Yael. 2009. “Candidate Selection Procedures, Seniority, and Vote-seeking Behavior.” Comparative Political Studies 42 (7): 945–970. doi: 10.1177/0010414008330600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobolewska, Maria. 2013. “Party Strategies and the Descriptive Representation of Ethnic Minorities: The 2010 British General Election.” West European Politics 36 (3): 615–633. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2013.773729
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swain, Carol M. 1993. Black Faces, Black Interests: The Representation of African Americans in Congress. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Székely, István Gergő, and István Horváth. 2014. “Diversity Recognition and Minority Representation in Central and Southeast Europe: A Comparative Analysis.” Nationalities Papers 42 (3): 426–448. doi: 10.1080/00905992.2014.916660
   Google Scholar
• Tatari, Eren. 2010. “Institutional Constraints on Effective Minority Representation.” European Journal of Economic and Political Studies 3 (0): 45–61.
   Google Scholar
• Tate, Katherine. 2003. Black Faces in the Mirror: African Americans and Their Representatives in the U.S. Congress. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Urbinati, Nadia, and Mark E. Warren. 2008. “The Concept of Representation in Contemporary Democratic Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 11 (1): 387–412. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006.190533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitby, Kenny J. 1997. The Color of Representation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitby, Kenny J., and George A. Krause. 2001. “Race, Issue Heterogeneity and Public Policy: The Republican Revolution in the 104th US Congress and the Representation of African-American Policy Interests.” British Journal of Political Science 31 (3): 555–572. doi: 10.1017/S0007123401000217
   Google Scholar