Understanding Communication Ecologies to Bridge Communication Research and Community Action

References

• Alinsky, S. D. (1971). Rules for radicals: A realistic primer for realistic radicals. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Ball-Rokeach, S. J., Gonzalez, C., Son, M., & Kligler-Vilenchik, N. (2012). Understanding individuals in the context of their environment: Communication ecology as a concept and method. Paper Presented at the Conference of the International Communication Association, Phoenix, AZ.
   Google Scholar
• Ball-Rokeach, S. J., Kim, Y. C., & Matei, S. (2001). Storytelling neighborhood: Paths to belonging in diverse urban environments. Communication Research, 28(4), 392–428. doi:10.1177/009365001028004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burawoy, M. (2005). For public sociology. American Sociological Review, 70(1), 4–28. doi:10.1177/000312240507000102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cancian, F. M. (1993). Conflicts between activist research and academic success: Participatory research and alternative strategies. The American Sociologist, 24(1), 92–106. doi:10.1007/BF02691947
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory in the 21st century: Applications for advancing social justice studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research ( 2nd ed., pp. 509–537). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, N.-T. N., Dong, F., Ball-Rokeach, S., Parks, M., & Huang, J. (2012). Building a new media platform for local storytelling and civic engagement in ethnically-diverse neighborhoods. New Media and Society, 14(6), 931–950. doi:10.1177/1461444811435640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheney, G. (2008). Encountering the ethics of engaged scholarship. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36(3), 281–288. doi:10.1080/00909880802172293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempsey, S. (2010). Critiquing community engagement. Management Communication Quarterly, 24(3), 359–390. doi:10.1177/0893318909352247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, W. (1985). The narrative paradigm: In the beginning. Journal of Communication, 35(4), 74–89. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1985.tb02974.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbert, S. (2005). Harnessing the power of the internet for advocacy and organizing. In M. Minkler (Ed.), Community organizing and community building for health (pp. 331–345). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, M. R., Kabwasa-Green, F., & Herranz, J. (2006). Cultural vitality in communities: Interpretation and indicators. Retrieved from http://www.urban.org/url.cfm?id = 311392&RSSFeed = UI_U.S.Cities/Communities.xml
   Google Scholar
• Kamberelis, G., & Dimitriadis, G. (2005). Focus groups: Strategic articulations of pedagogy, politics, and inquiry. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research ( 3rd ed., pp. 875–895). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.-C., & Ball-Rokeach, S. J. (2006). Civic engagement from a communication infrastructure perspective. Communication Theory, 16(2), 173–197. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00267.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, W.-Y., & Song, H. (2006). Geo-ethnic storytelling: An examination of ethnic media content in contemporary immigrant communities. Journalism, 7(3), 362–388. doi:10.1177/1464884906065518
   Google Scholar
• Matei, S. A., & Ball-Rokeach, S. J. (2005). Watts, the 1965 Los Angeles riots and the communicative construction of the fear epicenter of Los Angeles. Communication Monographs, 72(3), 301–323. doi:10.1080/03637750500206557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsaganis, M. (2008). Rediscovering the communication engine of neighborhood effects (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar
• Minkler, M., & Wallerstein, N. (2005). Improving health through community organization and community building: A health education perspective. In M. Minkler (Ed.), Community organizing and community building for health (pp. 26–50). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nyden, P. (2006). The challenges and opportunities of engaged research. In L. Silka (Ed.), Scholarship in action: Applied research and community change (pp. 11–25). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
   Google Scholar
• Park, A., Watson, N., & Galloway-Gilliam, L. (2008). South Los Angeles health equity scorecard. Community Health Councils. Retrieved from http://chc-inc.org/downloads/South%20LA%20Scorecard.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pilisuk, M., McAllister, J., Rothman, J., & Larin, L. (2005). New contexts of organizing: Functions, challenges, and solutions. In M. Minkler (Ed.), Community organizing and community building for health (pp. 97–115). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pulido, L. (1996). Multiracial organizing among environmental justice activists in Los Angeles. In M. Dear, H. Schockman, & G. Hise (Eds.), Rethinking Los Angeles (pp. 171–189). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Roussos, S. T., & Fawcett, S. B. (2000). A review of collaborative partnerships as a strategy for improving community health. Annual Review of Public Health, 21(1), 369–402. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.21.1.369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J. (2012). Great American city: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226733883.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, J. L., & Seibold, D. R. (2008). Practical engagements and co-created research. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36(3), 266–280. doi:10.1080/00909880802172285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirianni, C., & Friedland, L. (2001). Civic innovation in America: Community empowerment, public policy, and the movement for civic renewal. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stoecker, R. (1999). Are academics irrelevant? Roles for scholars in participatory research. The American Behavioral Scientist, 42, 5. doi:10.1177/00027649921954561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokols, D. (1996). Translating social ecological theory into guidelines for community health promotion. American Journal of Health Promotion, 10(4), 282–298. doi:10.4278/0890-1171-10.4.282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villanueva, G., & Broad, G. M. (2012). Communication Asset Mapping: An ecological application toward building healthy communities in South Los Angeles. Paper Presented at the Conference of the International Communication Association, Phoenix, AZ.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkin, H. A. (2013). Exploring the potential of Communication Infrastructure Theory for informing efforts to to reduce health disparities. Journal of Communication, 63(1), 181–200. doi:10.1111/jcom.12006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkin, H. A., Ball-Rokeach, S. J., Matsaganis, M. D., & Cheong, P. H. (2007). Comparing the communication ecologies of geo-ethnic communities: How people stay on top of their community. Electronic Journal of Communication, 17(1–2). Retrieved from http://www.cios.org/EJCPUBLIC/017/1/01711.HTML
   Google Scholar
• Wilkin, H. A., Moran, M. B., Ball-Rokeach, S. J., Gonzalez, C., & Kim, Y. C. (2010). Applications of communication infrastructure theory. Health Communication, 25(6–7), 611–612. doi:10.1080/10410236.2010.496839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkin, H. A., Stringer, K. A., O'Quin, K., Montgomery, S. A., & Hunt, K. (2011). Using communication infrastructure theory to formulate a strategy to locate “hard-to-reach” research participants. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 39(2), 201–213. doi:10.1080/00909882.2011.556140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar