Ethnographic Facilitation as a Complementary Methodology for Conducting Applied Communication Scholarship

References

• Barge, J. K., & Craig, R. T. (2009). Practical theory in applied communication scholarship. In L. R. Frey & K. N. Cissna (Eds.), Routledge handbook of applied communication research (pp. 55–78). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Barge, J., Jones, J. E., Kensler, M., Polok, N., Rianoshek, R., Simpson, J., & Shockley-Zalabak, P. (2008). Practitioner view toward engaged scholarship. Journal Of Applied Communication Research, 36(3), 245–250. doi:10.1080/00909880802172319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barge, J. K., & Shockley-Zalabak, P. (2008). Engaged scholarship and the creation of useful organizational knowledge. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36, 251–265. doi:10.1080/009880802172277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, S. L. (1995). Response to Conquergood: Don Quixotes in the academy—Are we tilting at windmills? In K. N. Cissna (Ed.), Applied communication in the 21st century (pp. 97–104). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, E. (1996). The scholarship of engagement. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 49, 18–33. doi:10.2307/3824459
   Google Scholar
• Browning, L. D., & Hawes, L. C. (1991). Style, process, surface, context: Consulting as postmodern art. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 19, 32–54. doi:10.1080/00909889109365291
   Google Scholar
• Brydan-Miller, M., Kral, M., Maguire, P., Noffke, S., & Sabhlok, A. (2011). Jazz and the banyan tree: Roots and riffs on participatory action research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 387–400). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Buzaglo, G., & Wheelan, S. A. (1999). Facilitating work team effectiveness: Case studies from Central America. Small Group Research, 30, 108–129. doi:10.1177/104649649903000106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheney, G., Wilhelmsson, M., & Zorn, T., Jr. (2002). 10 strategies for engaged scholarship. Management Communication Quarterly, 16, 92–100. doi:10.1177/0893318902161006
   Google Scholar
• Conquergood, D. (1988). Health theatre in a Hmong refugee camp: Performance, communication, culture. TDR: The Drama Review, 32 (3), 174–208. doi:10.2307/1145914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conquergood, D. (1991). Rethinking ethnography: Towards a critical cultural politics. Communication Monographs, 58, 179–194. doi:10.1080/03637759109376222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conquergood, D. (1994). Homeboys and hoods: Gang communication and cultural space. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), Group communication in context: Studies of natural groups (pp. 23–55). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Conquergood, D. (1995). Between rigor and relevance: Rethinking applied communication. In K. N. Cissna (Ed.), Applied communication in the 21st century (pp. 79–96). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cooley, E. (1994). Training an interdisciplinary team in communication and decision-making skills. Small Group Research, 25, 5–25. doi:10.1177/1046496494251002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corman, S. R. (2004). Postpositivism. In S. May & D. Mumby (Eds.), Engaging organizational communication theory and research: Multiple perspectives (pp. 15–34). Inglewood Cliffs, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Crabtree, R. D., & Ford, L. A. (2007). Community activist and communication consultant: Managing the dialectics of outsider-within status at a sexual assault recovery services center. In L. R. Frey & K. M. Carragee (Eds.), Communication activism: Vol. 1. Communicating for social change (pp. 249–285). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, R. T., & Muller, H. L. (2007). Unit II introduction: Metatheory. In R. T. Craig & H. L. Muller (Eds.), Theorizing communication: Readings across traditions (pp. 55–62). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, R. T., & Tracy, K. (1995). Grounded practical theory: The case of intellectual discussion. Communication Theory, 5, 248–272. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1995.tb00108.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deetz, S. (2008). Engagement as co-generative theorizing. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36, 288–296. doi:10.1080/00909880802172301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delise, L. A., Gorman, C. A., Brooks, A. M., Rentsch, J. R., & Johnson, D. S. (2010). The effects of team training on team outcomes: A meta-analysis. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 22, 53–80. doi:10.1002/piq.20068
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 1–32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, E. M. (1986). Meaning and interpretation in organizations. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 72, 88–97. doi:10.1080/00335638609383760
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, E. M., Baglia, J., & Pynes, J. E. (2006). Transforming emergency medicine through narrative: Qualitative action research at a community hospital. Health Communication, 19, 197–208. doi:10.1207/s15327027hc1903_2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellingson, L. L. (2009a). Engaging crystallization in qualitative research: An introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ellingson, L. L. (2009b). Ethnography in applied communication research. In L. R. Frey & K. N. Cissna (Eds.), Routledge handbook of applied communication research (pp. 129–152). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fetterman, D. M. (2010). Ethnography: Step-by-step (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Foley, D., & Valenzuela, A. (2005). Critical ethnography: The politics of collaboration. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 217–234). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, L. R. (1995a). Applied communication research on group facilitation in natural settings. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), Innovations in group facilitation: Applications in natural settings (pp. 1–23). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, L. R. (Ed.). (1995b). Innovations in group facilitation: Applications in natural settings. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, L. R. (1998). Communication and social justice research: Truth, justice, and the applied communication way. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 26, 155–164. doi:10.1080/00909889809365499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, L. R. (2000). To be applied or not to be applied: That isn't even the question; but wherefore art thou, applied communication researcher? Reclaiming applied communication research and redefining the role of the researcher. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 28, 178–182. doi:10.1080/00909880009365565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, L. R. (Ed.). (2006a). Facilitating group communication in context: Innovations and applications with natural groups (2 Vols.). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, L. R. (2006b). Introduction: Facilitating group communication in context: Innovations and applications with natural groups. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), Facilitating group communication in context: Innovations and applications with natural groups (2 Vols., pp. 1–59). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, L. R. (2009). What a difference more difference-making communication scholarship might make: Making a difference from and through communication research. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 37, 205–214. doi:10.1080/00909880902792321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, L. R., & Carragee, K. M. (2007). Introduction: Communication activism as engaged scholarship. In L. R. Frey & K. M. Carragee (Eds.), Communication activism (2 Vols., pp. 1–64). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, L. R., & SunWolf. (2009). Across applied divides: Great debates of applied communication scholarship. In L. R. Frey & K. N. Cissna (Eds.), Routledge handbook of applied communication research (pp. 26–54). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, S. R. (1994). Teamwork and communication: A 3-year case study of change. Management Communication Quarterly, 7, 282–296. doi:10.1177/0893318994007003003
   Google Scholar
• Gold, R. L. (1958). Roles in sociological field observations. Social Forces, 36, 217–223. doi:10.2307/2573808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodall, H. L. (2004). Narrative ethnography as applied communication research. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32, 185–194. doi:10.1080/0090988042000240130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gribas, J., & Sims, J. (2006). Metaphoric illumination and symbolic ambiguity: Applying the team metaphor for perceptual orientation. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), Facilitating group communication in context: Innovations and applications with natural groups: Vol. 2. Facilitating group task and team communication (pp. 177–202). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartwig, R. T. (2010). A facilitative ethnography of the communication of an evangelical church leadership team ( doctoral dissertation). Boulder, CO: University of Colorado Boulder. Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (516220134).
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, G., & Parkinson, C. (2008). Follow me: What's next for you? Chicago, IL: Willow Creek.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. D., & Long, L. M. (2002). “Being a part and being apart”: Dialectics and group communication In L. R. Frey (Ed.), New directions in group communication (25–;41). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Keyton, J. (2005). Letter from the editor. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 33, 285–293. doi:10.1080/00909880500278145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krizek, R. (2005). A meaning-centered approach to consulting: Contributing as an engaged communication scholar. In J. L. Simpson & P. Shockley-Zalabak (Eds.), Engaging communication, transforming organizations: Scholarship of engagement in action (pp. 127–146). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuk, G. (2000). “When to speak again”: Self-regulation under facilitation. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4, 291–306. doi:10.1037//1089-2699.4.4.291
   Google Scholar
• LeGreco, M., & Tracy, S. J. (2009). Discourse tracing as qualitative practice. Qualitative Inquiry, 15, 1516–1543. doi:10.1177/1077800409343064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science; selected theoretical papers (D. Cartwright, Ed.). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2011). Qualitative communication research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (2002). Introduction. In H. A. Linstone & M. Turoff (Eds.), The Delphi method: Techniques and applications (pp. 3–12). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Looney, J. A., Shaw, E. K., & Crabtree, B. F. (2011). Passing the baton: Sustaining organizational change after the facilitator leaves. Group Facilitation, 11, 15–23.
   Google Scholar
• Madison, D. S. (2012). Critical ethnography: Method, ethics, and performance (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Milburn, T., Kenefick, J. V., & Lambert, A. (2006). Facilitating communication during a board of directors' retreat: Enacting change at a family center. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), Facilitating group communication in context: Innovations and applications with natural groups: Vol. 2. Facilitating group task and team communication (pp. 63–88). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller-Day, M. (2008). Translational performances: Toward, relevant, engaging, and empowering social science. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(2), Article 54. Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net
   Google Scholar
• Novek, E., & Sanford, R. (2007). At the checkpoint: Journalistic practices, researcher reflexivity, and dialectical dilemmas in a women's prison. In L. R. Frey & K. M. Carragee (Eds.), Communication activism: Vol. 2. Media and performance activism (pp. 67–95). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parrish-Sprowl, J. (2006). Team facilitation of organizational change: A case study from a bona fide group perspective. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), Facilitating group communication in context: Innovations and applications with natural groups: Vol. 2. Facilitating group task and team communication (pp. 203–224). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, K., Spano, S., & Pearce, W. B. (2009). The multiple faces of the public dialogue consortium: Scholars, practitioners, and dreamers of better social worlds. In L. R. Frey & K. N. Cissna (Eds.), Routledge handbook of applied communication research (pp. 611–632). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Petronio, S. (1999). “Translating scholarship into practice”: An alternative metaphor. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 27, 87–91. doi:10.1080/00909889909365527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole, M. S., & DeSanctis, G. (1990). Understanding the use of group decision support systems: The theory of adaptive structuration. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfeld (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 173–193). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, W. J. (1996). An analysis of thinking and research about qualitative methods. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rainer, T. S., & Geiger, E. (2006). Simple church: Returning to God's process for making disciples. Nashville, TN: Broadman Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2008). Introduction. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Sage handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (2nd ed., pp. 1–13). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, L. (2000). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research, (2nd ed., pp. 923–948). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rush, E. K., & Tracy, S. J. (2010). Wikipedia as public scholarship: Communicating our impact online. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38, 309–315. doi:10.1080/00909882.2010.490846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarri, R. C., & Sarri, C. M. (1992). Organizational and community change through participatory action research. Administration in Social Work, 16, 99–122. doi:10.1300/J147v16n03_07
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schein, E. H. (1969). Process consultation: Its role in organization development. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, C., & Myers, K. K. (2005). The socialization of emotion: Learning emotion management at the fire station. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 33, 67–92. doi:10.1080/0090988042000318521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibold, D. R. (1995). Developing the “team” in a team-managed organization: Group facilitation in a new-design plant. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), Innovations in group facilitation: Applications in natural settings (pp. 282–298). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, J. L., & Seibold, D. R. (2008). Practical engagements and co-created research. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36, 266–280. doi:10.1080/00909880802172285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, J. L., & Shockley-Zalabak, R. (Eds.). (2005). Engaging communication, transforming organizations: Scholarship of engagement in action. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. W., Rosenman, K. D., Kotowski, M. R., Glazer, E., McFeters, C., Keesecker, N. M., & Law, A. (2008). Using the EPPM to create and evaluate the effectiveness of brochures to increase the use of hearing protection in farmers and landscape workers. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36, 200–218. doi:10.1080/00909880801922862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunwolf. (2002). Getting to “Groupaha!”. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), New directions in group communication (pp. 203–217). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sunwolf, & Frey, L. R. (2005). Facilitating group communication. In S. A. Wheelan (Ed.), The handbook of group research and practice (pp. 485–509). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sunwolf, & Seibold, D. R. (1999). The impact of formal procedures on group processes, members, and task outcomes. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), D. S. Gouran, & M. S. Poole (Assoc. Eds.), The handbook of group communication theory and research (pp. 395–431). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. C., & Trujillo, N. (2001). Qualitative research methods. In F. M. Jablin & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication (pp. 161–196). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. L. (2009). Building collective communication competence in interdisciplinary research teams. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 37, 278–297. doi:10.1080/00909880903025911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillmann, L. M. (2009). Speaking into silences: Autoethnography, communication, and applied research. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 37, 94–97. doi:10.1080/00909880802592649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2002a). Altered practice, altered stories, altered lives: Three considerations for translating organizational communication scholarship into practice. Management Communication Quarterly, 16, 85–91. doi:10.1177/0893318902161005
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2002b). When questioning turns to face threat: An interactional sensitivity in 911 call-taking. Western Journal of Communication, 66, 129–157. doi:10.1080/10570310209374730
   Google Scholar
• Trujillo, N. (1992). Interpreting (the work and the talk of) baseball: Perspectives on ballpark culture. Western Journal of Communication, 56, 350–371. doi:10.1080/10570319209374423
   Google Scholar
• Wheelan, S. A. (2005). Creating effective teams: A guide for members and leaders (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wheelan, S. A., & Furbur, S. (2006). Facilitating team development: Communication and productivity. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), Facilitating group communication in context: Innovations and applications with natural groups: Vol. 2. Facilitating group task and team communication (pp. 155–176). Mahwah, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar