Designing Communication Process for the Design of an Idea Zone at a Science Center

References

• Aakhus, M. (2007a). Communication as design. Communication Monographs, 74, 112–117. doi:10.1080/03637750701196383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aakhus, M. (2007b). Conversations for reflection: Augmenting transitions and transformations in expertise. In C. McInerney & R. Day (Eds.), Rethinking knowledge management: From knowledge objects to knowledge processes (pp. 1–20). Berlin: Springer. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-71011-6_1
   Google Scholar
• Aakhus, M., & Jackson, S. (2005). Technology, interaction, and design. In K. L. Fitch & R. E. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35, 216–224. doi:10.1080/01944366908977225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, J. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bateson, G. (1968). Information and codification: A philosophical approach. In J. Ruesch & G. Bateson (Eds.), Communication: The social matrix of psychiatry (pp. 168–211). New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature. New York, NY: Bantam Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bateson, M. (1991). Our own metaphor: A personal account of a conference on the effects of conscious purpose on human adaptation (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J., & Isaacs, D. (1997). Conversation as a core business process. The Systems Thinker, 7(10), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J., & Isaacs, D. (2005). The World Café: Shaping our futures through conversations that matter. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T., & Katz, B. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. New York, NY: Harper Business.
   Google Scholar
• Bucciarelli, L. L. (1988). An ethnographic perspective on engineering design. Design Studies, 9, 159–168. doi:10.1016/0142-694X(88)90045-2
   Google Scholar
• Bunker, B., & Alban, B. (2006). The handbook of large-group methods. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. (1999). Five reasons for scenario-based design. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 3051–3061). Wailea Maui, HI. Retrieved from http://www.computer.org/csdl/proceedings/hicss/1999/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Ehn, P. (1993). Scandinavian design: On participation and skill. In D. Schuler & A. Namioka (Eds.), Participatory design: Principles and practices (pp. 41–77). Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Ehn, P. (2011). Design things: Drawing things together and making things public. TECNOSCIENZA: Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 2(1), 31–52.
   Google Scholar
• Elden, M., & Levin, M. (1991). Cogenerative learning: Bringing participation into action research. In W. F. Whyte (Ed.), Participatory action research (pp. 127–142). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Faste, R. A. (1987). Perceiving needs. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Fulton Suri, J., & Marsh, M. (2000). Scenario building as an ergonomics method in consumer product design. Applied Ergonomics, 31, 151–157. doi:10.1016/S0003-6870(99)00035-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaines, E. (2006). Communication and the semiotics of space. Journal of Creative Communications, 1, 173–181. doi:10.1177/097325860600100203
   Google Scholar
• Goodbun, J. (2012). Flexibility and ecological planning: Gregory Bateson on urbanism. Architectural Design, 82, 52–55. doi:10.1002/ad.1428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenbaum, J. M., & Kyng, M. (1991). Design at work: Cooperative design of computer systems. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, D., & Levin, M. (2007). Introduction to action research: Social research for social change ( 2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, J. (2003). Scandinavian approaches to participatory design. International Journal of Engineering Education, 19, 62–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grudin, J., & Pruitt, J. (2002). Personas, participatory design and product development: An infrastructure for engagement. In T. Binder, J. Gregory, & I. Wagner (Eds.), Proceedings of the participatory design conference: Participation and design: Inquiring into the politics, contexts and practices of collaborative design work (pp. 144–152). Palo Alto, CA: CPSR.
   Google Scholar
• Harries-Jones, P. (1995). A recursive vision: Ecological understanding and Gregory Bateson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herbst, P. G. (1976). Alternatives to hierarchies. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. (2010). Where good ideas come from: The natural history of innovation. New York, NY: Riverhead Books.
   Google Scholar
• Madsen, K. (1994). A guide to metaphorical design. Communications of the ACM, 37, 57–62. doi:10.1145/198366.198381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, D. (2006). Ad hoc personas and empathetic focus. In J. Pruitt & T. Adlin (Eds.), The persona lifecycle: Keeping people in mind throughout product design (pp. 154–157). Boston: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Oldenburg, R. (1999). The great good place: Cafés, coffee shops, bookstores, hair salons and other hangouts at the heart of a community ( 2nd ed.). New York, NY: Marlowe.
   Google Scholar
• Patnaik, D., & Becker, R. (1999). Needfinding: The why and how of uncovering people's needs. Design Management Journal, 10, 37–43.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1979). Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought. Cambridgeand New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Senescu, R. R., & Haymaker, J. R. (2009). Specifications for a social and technical environment for improving design process communication. Stanford, CA: Center for Integrated Facility Engineering, Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Smørdal, O., & Stuedahl, D. (2013, September). Collaboration and co-design. Presented at The Future Museum Public: Approaches to Media and Meaning Making conference, University of Oslo, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Sonnenwald, D. (1996). Communication roles that support collaboration during the design process. Design Studies, 17, 277–301. doi:10.1016/0142-694X(96)00002-6
   Google Scholar
• Steier, F., & Jorgenson, J. (2003). Ethics and aesthetics of observing frames. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 10, 124–136.
   Google Scholar
• Steier, F., & Ostrenko, W. (2000). Taking cybernetics seriously at a science center: Reflection-in-interaction and second order organizational learning. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 7, 47–69.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, S., & Brown, J. (2005). The World Café in Singapore: Creating a learning culture through dialogue. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41, 83–90. doi:10.1177/0021886304272851
   Google Scholar
• Tang, J. C., & Leifer, L. (1988). A framework for understanding the workspace activity of design teams. Proceedings of the 1988 ACM Conference on Computer-supported Cooperative Work (pp. 244–249). Portland, OR.
   Google Scholar
• Weeks, C. (1994). A study of similarity and analogical decision making in collaborative design ( Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. (1968). Philosophical Investigations ( 3rd ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar