Discursive Strategies of Civil Disagreement in Public Dialogue Groups

References

• Anderson, R., Baxter, L. A., & Cissna, K. N. (Eds.). (2004). Dialogue: Theorizing difference in communication studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Arnett, R. A. (2001). Dialogic civility as pragmatic ethical praxis: An interpersonal metaphor for the public domain. Communication Theory, 11, 315–338. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2001.tb00245.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrow, H., Poole, M. S., Henry, K. B., Wheelan, S., & Moreland, R. (2004). Time, change, and development: The temporal perspective on groups. Small Group Research, 35, 73–105. doi:10.1177/1046496403259757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballard, D. I., & Seibold, D. R. (2000). Time orientation and temporal variation across work groups: Implications for group and organizational communication. Western Journal of Communication, 64, 218–242. doi:10.1080/10570310009374672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballard, D. I., & Seibold, D. R. (2004). Communication-related organizational structures and work group temporal experiences: The effects of coordination method, technology type, and feedback cycle on members' construals and enactments of time. Communication Monographs, 71, 1–27. doi:10.1080/03634520410001691474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benne, K., & Sheats, P. (1948). Functional roles of group members. Journal of Social Issues, 4, 41–49. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1948.tb01783.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, L. W. (2008). Deliberation, storytelling, and dialogic moments. Communication Theory, 18, 93–116. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00315.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, L. W. (2012). How people communicate during deliberative events. In T. Nabatchi, M. Weiksner, J. Gastil, & M. Leighninger (Eds.), Democracy in motion: Evaluating the practice and impact of deliberative civic engagement (pp. 59–81). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bohman, J. (1995). Public reason and cultural pluralism: Political liberalism and the problem of moral conflict. Political Theory, 23, 253–279. doi:10.1177/0090591795023002004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language use. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burkhalter, S., Gastil, J., & Kelshaw, T. (2002). A conceptual definition and theoretical model of public deliberation in small face-to-face groups. Communication Theory, 12, 398–422. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00276.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbaugh, D. (2005). Cultures in conversation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, S. L. (1998). Civility: Manners, morals, and the etiquette of democracy. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Checkoway, B. (1981). The politics of public hearings. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 17, 566–582. doi:10.1177/002188638101700411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, R. T., & Tracy, K. (1995). Grounded practical theory: The case of intellectual discussion. Communication Theory, 5, 248–272. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1995.tb00108.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darr, C. R. (2005). Civility as rhetorical enactment: The John Ashcroft “debates” and Burke's theory of form. Southern Communication Journal, 70, 316–328. doi:10.1080/10417940509373337
   Google Scholar
• Darr, C. R. (2011). Adam Ferguson's civil society and the rhetorical functions of (in)civility in United States Senate debate. Communication Quarterly, 59, 603–624. doi:10.1080/01463373.2011.614208
   Google Scholar
• Eliasoph, N. (1998). Avoiding politics: How Americans produce apathy in everyday life. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, C. L., & Oleszek, W. J. (1998). If it ain't broke bad, don't fix it a lot. PS, Political Science and Politics, 30, 24–28.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text, 25/26, 56–80. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/466240 doi:10.2307/466240
   Google Scholar
• Gastil, J. (2000). By popular demand. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gastil, J., & Levine, P. (Eds.). (2005). The deliberative democracy handbook: Strategies for effective civic engagement in the 21^st century. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (1996). Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guttman, N. (2007). Bringing the mountain to the public: Dilemmas and contradictions in the procedures of public deliberation initiatives that aim to get “ordinary citizens” to deliberate policy issues. Communication Theory, 17, 411–438. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00305.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heierbacher, S. (2010). Engagement streams framework. National Coalition of Dialogue and Deliberation. Retrieved from http://www.ncdd.org/files/NCDD2010_Engagement_Streams.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. R. (1994). The commercial spirit of intimate life and the abduction of feminism: Signs from women's advice books. Theory, Culture & Society, 11(2), 1–24. doi:10.1177/026327694011002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, A. (2010). Using the telephone for narrative interviewing: A research note. Qualitative Research, 10(1), 113–121. doi:10.1177/1468794109348686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkinson, N. (2010). Julius “Jay” stern: A biography. Parkersburg, WV: Interactivity Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, L. R., Cook, F. L., & Delli Carpini, M. X. (2009). Talking together: Public deliberation and political participation in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jarmon, L. (2009). Displays of trust/mistrust in public meetings: “I don't believe you are going to jack us around!” International Journal of Public Participation, 3(2), 90–120. Retrieved from http://www.iap2.org/associations/4748/files/Journal_10January_Jarmon.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, J. V. (1973). Communicative functions of silence. A Review of General Semantics, 30, 249–257.
   Google Scholar
• Johannesen, R. L. (1974). The functions of silence: A plea for communication research. Western Speech, 38, 25–35. doi:10.1080/10570317409373806
   Google Scholar
• Jungkunz, V. (2013). Deliberate silences. Journal of Public Deliberation, 9(1), Article 12. Retrieved from http://www.publicdeliberation.net/jpd/vol9/iss1/art12
   Google Scholar
• Kurzon, D. (2007). Towards a typology of silence. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 1673–1688. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2007.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Leighninger, M. (2006). The next form of democracy: How expert rule is giving way to shared governance … and why politics will never be the same. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leighter, J. L., & Black, L. W. (2010). “I'm just raising the question”: Terms for talk and practical metadiscursive argument in public meetings. Western Journal of Communication, 74, 547–568. doi:10.1080/10570314.2010.512281
   Google Scholar
• Leighter, J. L., Black, L. W., Cockett, L., & Jarmon, L. (2009). The practice of public meetings: Introductory essay. International Journal of Public Participation, 3(2), 1–13. Retrieved from http://www.iap2.org/associations/4748/files/2_Leighter_etal_Introduction_Updated_IJP2Vol3No2_1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J. J., Hartz-Karp, J., Amengual, M., & Gastil, J. (2006). Norms of deliberation: An inductive study. Journal of Public Deliberation, 2, Article 7. Retrieved from http://services.bepress.com/jpd/vol2/iss1/art7/
   Google Scholar
• McComas, K. A. (2001). Theory and practice of public meetings. Communication Theory, 11, 36–55. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2001.tb00232.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKerrow, R. E. (2001). Presidential address, 2000 NCA convention: Coloring outside the lines; the limits of civility. Washington, DC: Spectra.
   Google Scholar
• Mirivel, J. C. (2008). The physical examination in cosmetic surgery: Communication strategies to promote the desirability of surgery. Health Communication, 23, 153–170. doi:10.1080/10410230801968203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, W. B., & Littlejohn, S. W. (1997). Moral conflict: When social worlds collide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ryfe, D. (2006). Narrative and deliberation in small group forums. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 34, 72–93. doi:10.1080/00909880500420226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spano, S. (2006). Theory and practice in public dialogue: A case study in facilitating community transformation. In L. Frey (Ed.), Facilitating group communication in context: Innovations and applications with natural groups (pp. 271–289). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. R., & Zediker, K. E. (2000). Dialogue as tensional, ethical practice. Southern Communication Journal, 65, 224–242. doi:10.1080/10417940009373169
   Google Scholar
• Stromer-Galley, J., & Muhlberger, P. (2009). Agreement and disagreement in group deliberation: Effects on deliberation satisfaction, future engagement, and decision legitimacy. Political Communication, 26, 173–192. doi:10.1080/10584600902850775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturges, J. E., & Hanrahan, K. J. (2004). Comparing telephone and face-to-face qualitative interviewing: A research note. Qualitative Research, 4(1), 107–118. doi:10.1177/1468794104041110
   Google Scholar
• Toker, C. W. (2005). The deliberative ideal and co-optation in the Georgia Ports Authority's stakeholder evaluation group. Environmental Communication Yearbook, 2, 19–48. doi:10.1207/s15567362ecy0201_2
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, R. M. (2009). Town meeting as a communication event: Democracy's act sequence. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42, 68–89. doi:10.1080/08351810802671743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, K. (1995). Action-implicative discourse analysis. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 14, 195–215. doi:10.1177/0261927X95141011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, K. (1997). Colloquium: Dilemmas of academic discourse. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, K. (2005). Reconstructing communication practices: Action-implicative discourse analysis. In K. L. Fitch & R. E. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 301–319). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, K. (2007). The discourse of crisis in public meetings: Case study of a school district's multimillion dollar error. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 35, 418–441. doi:10.1080/0090988071617133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, K. (2010). Challenges of ordinary democracy: A case study in deliberation and dissent. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, K., & Agne, R. R. (2002). “I just need to ask somebody some questions”: Sensitivities in domestic dispute calls. In J. Cottrell (Ed.), Language in the legal process (pp. 75–89). Brunel, UK: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, K., & Craig, R. T. (2010). Studying interaction in order to cultivate practice: Action-implicative discourse analysis. In J. Streeck (Ed.), New adventures in language and interaction (pp. 145–166). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, K., & Dimock, A. (2004). Meetings: Discursive sites for building and fragmenting community. In P. J. Kabfleisch (Ed.), Communication yearbook 28 (pp. 127–165). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Uslaner, E. M. (2000). Is the Senate more civil than the house? In B. A. Loomis (Ed.), Esteemed colleagues: Civility and deliberation in the U.S. Senate (pp. 32–55). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Webler, T. (1999). The craft and theory of public participation: A dialectical process. Journal of Risk Research, 2, 55–71. doi:10.1080/136698799376989
   Google Scholar
• Wiederhold, A., & Gastil, J. (2013). Hearing all sides? Soliciting and managing different viewpoints in deliberation. In L. Carson, J. Gastil, J. Hartz-Karp, & R. Lubensky (Eds.), The Australian Citizens' parliament and the future of deliberative democracy. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Witteborn, S., & Sprain, L. M. (2009). Grouping processes in a public meeting from an ethnography of communication and cultural discourse analysis perspective. International Journal of Public Participation, 3(2), 14–35. Retrieved from http://www.iap2.org/associations/4748/files/Journal_10January_WittebornSprain.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (1996). Communication and the other: Beyond deliberative democracy. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political (pp. 120–135). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar