“Bridging the Gap”: Difference, Dialogue, and Community Organizing

References

• Allen, B. J. (2007). Theorizing communication and race. Communication Monographs, 74, 259–264. doi:10.1080/03637750701393055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashcraft, K. L. (2011). Knowing work through the communication of difference: A revised agenda for difference studies. In D. K. Mumby (Ed.), Reframing difference in organizational communication studies: Research, pedagogy, practice (pp. 3–29). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ashcraft, K. L., & Allen, B. J. (2003). The racial foundation of organizational communication. Communication Theory, 13, 5–38. doi:10.1093/ct/13.1.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badenhausen, K. (2010, April 14). The best places for business and careers. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/2010/04/13/forbes-best-places-for-business-washington-best-places-for-business.html
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barge, J. K., & Little, M. (2002). Dialogical wisdom, communicative practice, and organizational life. Communication Theory, 12, 375–397. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00275.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buber, M. (1970). I and thou. New York, NY: Touchstone.
   Google Scholar
• Buzzanell, P. M. (2009). Preface. In L. M. Harter, M. J. Dutta & C. E. Cole (Eds.), Communicating for social impact: Engaging communication theory, research, and pedagogy (pp. vii–x). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conquergood, D. (1995). Between rigor and relevance: Rethinking applied communication. In K. N. Cissna (Ed.), Group communication in context: Studies of natural groups (pp. 23–55). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Deetz, S. (1995). Transforming communication, transforming business: Building responsive and responsible workplaces. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deetz, S. (2008). Engagement as co-generative theorizing. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36, 289–287. doi:10.1080/00909880802172301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempsey, S. E. (2007). Negotiating accountability within international contexts: The role of bounded voice. Communication Monographs, 74, 311–332. doi:10.1080/03637750701543485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempsey, S. E. (2010). Critiquing community engagement. Management Communication Quarterly, 24, 359–390. doi:10.1177/0893318909352247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellingson, L. L. (2009). Ethnography in applied communication research. In L. R. Frey & K. N. Cissna (Eds.), Routledge handbook of applied communication research (pp. 129–152). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, L. R. (2009). What a difference more difference-making communication scholarship might make: Making a difference from and through communication research. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 37, 205–214. doi:10.1080/00909880902792321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, L. R., & Sunwolf. (2009). Across applied divides: Great debates of applied communication scholarship. In L. R. Frey & K. N. Cissna (Eds.), Routledge handbook of applied communication research (pp. 26–54). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grimes, D. (2002). Challenging the status quo? Whiteness in the diversity management Literature. Management Communication Quarterly, 15, 381–410. doi:10.1177/0893318902153003
   Google Scholar
• Halualani, R., Fassett, D. L., Morrison, J., & Dodge, P. (2006). Between the structural and the personal: Situated sense-makings of “race”. Communication & Critical/Cultural Studies, 3, 70–93. doi:10.1080/14791420500505700
   Google Scholar
• Heath, R. G. (2007). Rethinking community collaboration through a dialogic lens: Creativity, democracy, and diversity in community organizing. Management Communication Quarterly, 21, 145–171. doi:10.1177/0893318907306032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby, E. L. (2011). “But society is beyond _ism”(?): Teaching how differences are “organized” via institutional privelege↔oppression. In D. K. Mumby (Ed.), Reframing Difference in Organizational Communication Studies: Research, Pedagogy, Practice (pp. 127–149). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kirby, E. L., & Harter, L. M. (2002). Speaking the language of the bottom-line: The metaphor of “managing diversity”. Journal of Business Communication, 40, 28–49. doi:10.1177/002194360304000103
   Google Scholar
• Kreuger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2008). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2011). Qualitative communication research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, L. K. (2006). Collaborative interaction: Review of communication scholarship and a research agenda. In C. S. Beck (Ed.), Communication yearbook 30 (pp. 168–209). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, L., Isbell, M. G., & Koschmann, M. (2010). Collaborative tensions: Practitioners' experiences of interorganizational relationships. Communication Monographs, 77, 460–479. doi:10.1080/03637751.2010.523605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macbeth, D. (2001). On “reflexivity” in qualitative research: Two readings and a third. Qualitative Inquiry, 7, 35–68. doi:10.1177/107780040100700103
   Google Scholar
• Market Street Services, Inc. (2009, October). Springfield area, 2009 competitive assessment. Retrieved from http://www.Springfieldchamber.com/no_cache/economic_development/economic_development_strategic_plan/
   Google Scholar
• Mease, J. J. (2012). Reconsidering consultants' strategic use of the business case for diversity. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 40, 384–402. doi:10.1080/00909882.2012.720380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicotera, A. M., Clinkscales, M. J., Dorsey, L. K., & Niles, M. N. (2009). Race as political identity: Problematic issues for applied communication research. In L. R. Frey & K. N. Cissna (Eds.), Routledge handbook of applied communication research (pp. 203–232). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Norander, S., & Harter, L. M. (2012). Reflexivity in practice: Challenges and potentials of transnational organizing. Management Communication Quarterly, 26, 74–105. doi:10.1177/0893318911415607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak, D. R., & Harter, L. M. (2008). “Flipping the scripts” of poverty and panhandling: Organizing democracy by creating connections. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 26, 391–414. doi:10.1080/00909880802104890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orbe, M. P. (2005). “The more things change …:” Civil rights health assessment in a “majority-minority” U.S. community. The Howard Journal of Communications, 16, 177–199. doi:10.1080/10646170500207923
   Google Scholar
• Orbe, M. P., & Allen, B. J. (2008). “Race matters” in the journal of applied communication research. Howard Journal of Communications, 19, 201–220. doi:10.1080/10646170802218115
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, K. A., & Pearce, W. B. (2001). The public dialogue consortium's school-wide dialogue process: A communication approach to develop citizen skills and enhance school climate. Communication Theory, 11, 105–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perriton, L. (2009). “We don't want complaining women!” A critical analysis of the business case for diversity. Management Communication Quarterly, 23, 218–243. doi:10.1177/0893318909343122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, L. (2009). Handling qualitative data: A practical guide (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• The New York Times (1906, April 16). Third Negro lynched; Troops in Springfield. Retrieved from http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F20915FF3C5A12738DDDAF0994DC405B868CF1D3
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Zoller, H. M. (2000). ‘A place you haven't visited before’: Creating the conditions for community dialogue. Southern Communication Journal, 65, 191–208. doi:10.1080/10417940009373167
   Google Scholar