466
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Developers' Views about Public Meetings in the Context of Public Relations Theory

References

  • Aldoory, L., & Sha, B. (2007). The situational theory of publics: Practical applications, methodological challenges, and theoretical horizons. In E. L. Toth (Ed.), The future of excellence in public relations and communication management (pp. 339–355). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Bazerman, M. H. (1994). Judgement in managerial decision making. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Berry, J. M., Pourtney, K.E., Bablitch, M. B., & Mahoney, R. (1997). Public involvement in administration: The structural determinants of effective citizen participation. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 13, 7–23.
  • Besley, J. C. (2012). Imagining public engagement. Public Understanding of Science, 21(5), 590–605.
  • Besley, J. C., & Diels, J. (2009). Public meetings in entertainment television programming: Using procedural justice to analyze fictional civic participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53, 419–443. doi:10.1080/08838150903102402
  • Besley, J. C., & Nisbet, M. C. (2013). How scientists view the public, the media and the political process. Public Understanding of Science, 22(6), 1–16. doi:10.1177/0963662511418743
  • Besley, J. C., & Tanner, A. H. (2011). What science communication scholars think about training scientists to communicate. Science Communication, 33, 239–263. doi:10.1177/1075547010386972
  • Biernacki, P., & Waldorf, D. (1981). Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods & Research, 10, 141–163.
  • Bohman, J., & Rehg, W. (1997). Deliberative democracy: Essays on reason and politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Botan, C. H., & Taylor, M. (2004). Public relations: State of the field. Journal of Communication, 54, 645–661. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02649.x
  • Broom, G. M., Casey, S., & Ritchey, J. (1997). Toward a concept and theory of organization-public relationships. Journal of Public Relations Research, 9(2), 83–98. doi:10.1207/s1532754xjprr0902_01
  • Broom, G. M., Casey, S., & Ritchey, J. (2000). Concept and theory of organization-public relationships. In J. A. Ledingham & S. D. Bruning (Eds.), Public relations as relationship management: A relational approach to the study and practice of public relations (pp. 3–22). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Bryan, F. M. (2004). Real democracy: The New England town meeting and how it works. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Burke, E. M. (1979). A participatory approach to public planning. New York, NY: Human Sciences Press.
  • Chaffee, S. H., & Roser, C. (1986). Involvement and the consistency of knowledge, attitudes and behaviors. Communication Research, 13, 373–399. doi:10.1177/009365086013003006
  • Checkoway, B. (1981). The politics of public hearings. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 17, 566–582. doi:10.1177/002188638101700411
  • Cousin, M.-E., & Siegrist, M. (2010). Risk perception of mobile communication: A mental models approach. Journal of Risk Research, 13, 599–620. doi:10.1080/13669870903236751
  • Cutlip, S. M., Center, A. H., & Broome, G. M. (2000). Effective public relations (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Dozier, D. M., & Ehling, W. P. (1992). Evaluation of public relations programs. In James E. Grunig (Ed.), Excellence in public relations and communication management (pp. 159–184). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Fiorino, D. J. (1990). Citizen participation and environmental risk: A Survey of institutional mechanisms. Science, Technology & Human Values, 15, 226–243. doi:10.1177/016224399001500204
  • Gastil, J., & Levine, P. (Eds.). (2005). The deliberative democracy handbook: Strategies for effective civic engagement in the twenty-first century. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Graber, D. A. (1993). Processing the news: How people tame the information tide (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
  • Grunig, J. E. (1997). A situational theory of publics: Conceptual history, recent challenges and new research. In D. Moss, T. MacManus, & D. Vercic (Eds.), Public relations research: An international perspective (pp. 3–38). London: International Thomson Business Press.
  • Grunig, J. E., & Huang, Y. H. (2000). From organizational effectiveness to relationship indicators: Antecedents of relationships, public relations strategies, and relationship outcomes. In J. A. Ledingham & S. D. Bruning (Eds.), Public relations as relationship management: A relational approach to the study and practice of public relations (pp. 23–54). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Grunig, J. E., & Hunt, T. (1984). Managing public relations. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
  • Grunig, L. A. (1992). Activism and public relations. In James E. Grunig (Ed.), Excellence in public relations and communication management (pp. 503–530). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Grunig, L. A., Grunig, J. E., & Ehling, W. P. (1992). Activism and public relations. In James E. Grunig (Ed.), Excellence in public relations and communication management (pp. 503–530). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (2004). Why deliberative democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Hallahan, K. (2000). Inactive publics: The forgotten publics in public relations. Public Relations Review, 26, 499–515. doi:10.1016/S0363-8111(00)00061-8
  • Hallahan, K. (2001). The dynamics of issues activation and response: An issues processes model. Journal of Public Relations Research, 13(1), 27–59. doi:10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1301_3
  • Hamilton, P. K. (1992). Grunig's situational theory: A replication, application, and extension. Journal of Public Relations Research, 4(3), 123–149. doi:10.1207/s1532754xjprr0403_01
  • Heath, R. L. (1997). Strategic issues management: Organizations and public policy challenges. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Heath, R. L. (2002). Issues management: Its past, present and future. Journal of Public Affairs, 2, 209–214. doi:10.1002/pa.114
  • Heath, R. L. (2006). A rhetorical theory approach to issues management. In C. H. Botan & V. Hazleton (Eds.), Public relations theory II (pp. 63–99). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Hibbing, J. R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (2002). Stealth democracy: Americansbeliefs about how government should work. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hung, C. F. (2005). Exploring types of organization–public relationships and their implications for relationship management in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 17, 393–426. doi:10.1207/s1532754xjprr1704_4
  • Jaques, T. (2002). Towards a new terminology: Optimising the value of issue management. Journal of Communication Management, 7(2), 140–147. doi:10.1108/13632540310807359
  • Johnson, K. N., Johnson, R. L., Edwards, D. K., & Wheaton, C. A. (2003). Public participation in wildlife management: Opinions from public meetings and random surveys. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 21, 218–225.
  • Kasperson, R. E. (1986). Six propositions on public participation and their relevance for risk communication. Risk Analysis, 6, 275–281. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1986.tb00219.x
  • Kemmis, D. (1990). Community and the politics of place. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
  • Kim, Y. (2001). Searching for the organization-public relationship: A valid and reliable instrument. Journalism and Mass Communications Quarterly, 78, 799–815. doi:10.1177/107769900107800412
  • Lauzen, M. M. (1997). Understanding the relation between public relations and issues management. Journal of Public Relations Research, 9(1), 65–82. doi:10.1207/s1532754xjprr0901_03
  • Ledingham, J. A., & Bruning, S. D. (1998). Relationship management and public relations: Dimensions of an organization-public relationship. Public Relations Review, 24(1), 55–65. doi:10.1016/S0363-8111(98)80020-9
  • Lindloff, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2011). Qualitative communication research methods (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • McComas, K. A. (2001a). Public meetings about local waste management problems: Comparing participants to nonparticipants. Environmental Management, 27(1), 135–147. doi:10.1007/s002670010139
  • McComas, K. A. (2001b). Theory and practice of public meetings. Communication Theory, 11(1), 36–55. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2001.tb00232.x
  • McComas, K. A. (2003a). Citizen satisfaction with public meetings used for risk communication. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 31, 164–184. doi:10.1080/0090988032000064605
  • McComas, K. A. (2003b). Public meetings and risk amplification: A longitudinal study. Risk Analysis, 23, 1257–1270. doi:10.1111/j.0272-4332.2003.00399.x
  • McComas, K. A. (2003c). Trivial pursuits: Participant views of public meetings. Journal of Public Relations Research, 15(2), 91–115. doi:10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1502_1
  • McComas, K. A., Arvai, J. L., & Besley, J. C. (2009). Linking public participation and decision making through risk communication. In R. L. Heath & D. H. O’Hair (Eds.), Handbook of crisis and risk communication (pp. 364–385). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • McComas, K. A., Besley, J. C., & Trumbo, C. W. (2006). Why citizens do and don't attend public meetings about possible local cancer clusters. Policy Studies Journal, 34, 671–698. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2006.00197.x
  • McComas, K. A., Foster, M. W., Trumbo, C. W., & Besley, J. C. (2007). Exploring the notion of public meetings as social stations of risk amplification. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for Risk Analysis, San Antonio, TX.
  • McComas, K. A., Trumbo, C. W., & Besley, J. C. (2007). Public meetings about suspected cancer clusters: The impact of voice, interactional justice, and risk perception on attendees’ attitudes in six communities. Journal of Health Communication, 12, 527–549. doi:10.1080/10810730701508245
  • Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B., Bostrom, A., & Atman, C. (2002). Risk communication: A mental models approach. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • National Research Council. (2008). Public participation in environmental assessment and decision making. Panel on public participation in environmental assessment and decision making. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
  • Richardson, M., Sherman, J., & Gismondi, J. (1993). Winning back the words: Confronting experts in an environmental public hearing. Toronto, Ontario: Garamond Press.
  • Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2005). A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science, Technology & Human Values, 30, 251–290. doi:10.1177/0162243904271724
  • Ryfe, D. M. (2002). The practice of deliberative democracy: A study of 16 deliberative organizations. Political Communication, 19, 359–377. doi:10.1080/01957470290055547
  • Sinclair, M. (1977). The public hearing as a participatory device: Evaluation of the IJC experience. In W. R. D. Sewell & J. T. Coppock (Eds.), Public participation in planning (pp. 105–122). London: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Werder, K. P. (2006). Responding to activism: An experimental analysis of public relations strategy influence on attributes of publics. Journal of Public Relations Research, 18, 335–356. doi:10.1207/s1532754xjprr1804_3
  • Zaksek, M., & Arvai, J. L. (2004). Toward improved communication about wildland fire: Mental models research to identify information needs for natural resource management. Risk Analysis, 24, 1503–1514. doi:10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00545.x
  • Zaltman, G., & Duncan, R. (1977). Strategies for planned change. New York, NY: Wiley.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.