Virtuality, Technology Use, and Engagement Within Organizations

References

• Ahuja, M. K., & Carley, K. M. (1998). Network structure in virtual organizations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(4). doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.1998.tb00079.x
   Google Scholar
• Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science, 3(3), 321–341. doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argote, L., McEvily, B., & Reagans, R. (2003). Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Science, 49(4), 571–582. doi:10.1287/mnsc.49.4.571.14424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argote, L., McEvily, B., & Reagans, R. (2010). Keeping the wheels turning: The dynamics of managing networks of practice. Journal of Management Studies, 47(1), 85–108. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00867.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkman, L. (2000). Social integration, social networks, social support, and health. In L. Berkman & I. Kawachi (Eds.), Social epidemiology (pp. 137–173). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 17(3), 303–316. doi:10.1177/0049124189017003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., & Pearl, J. (2013). Eight myths about causality and structural equation models. In S. L. Morgan (Ed.), Handbook of causal analysis for social research (pp. 301–328). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Boudreau, M.-C., Loch, K. D., Robey, D., & Straud, D. (1998). Going global: Using information technology to advance the competitiveness of the virtual transnational organization. Academy of Management Perspectives, 12(4), 120–128. doi:10.5465/AME.1998.1334008
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995). Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 20, 343–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunderson, J. S., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2002). Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 875–893. doi: 10.2307/3069319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunderson, J. S., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2003). Management team learning orientation and business unit performance. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 88(3), 552–560. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, K. E., & Lee, B. A. (1991). Name generators in surveys of personal networks. Social Networks, 13(3), 203–221. doi:10.1016/0378-8733(91)90006-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, J., Ramgolam, D. I., Schaefer, K. M., & Sandlin, A. N. (2011). The rate and delay in overload: An investigation of communication overload and channel synchronicity on identification and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 39(1), 38–54. doi: 10.1080/00909882.2010.536847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chudoba, K. M., Wynn, E., Lu, M., & Watson-Manheim, M. B. (2005). How virtual are we? Measuring virtuality and understanding its impact in a global organization. Information Systems Journal, 15, 279–306. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00200.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. G., & Gibson, C. B. (2003). In the beginning: Introduction and framework. In C. B. Gibson & S. G. Cohen (Eds.), Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness (pp. 1–13). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Contractor, N. S., & Siebold, D. R. (1993). Theoretical frameworks for the study of structuring processes in group decision support systems: Adaptive structuration theory and self-organizing systems theory. Human Communication Research, 19(4), 528–563. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1993.tb00312.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corman, S. R. (1990). A model of perceived communication in collective networks. Human Communication Research, 16, 582–602. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1990.tb00223.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corman, S. R., & Scott, C. R. (1994). Perceived networks, activity foci, and observable communication in social collectives. Communication Theory, 4(3), 171–190. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1994.tb00089.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramton, C. D. (2001). The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organization Science, 12(3), 346–371. doi: 10.1287/orsc.12.3.346.10098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, R. L., & Parker, A. (2004). The hidden power of social networks: Understanding how work really gets done in organizations. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, R. L., Parker, A., Prusak, L., & Borgatti, S. P. (2001). Knowing what we know: Supporting knowledge creation and sharing in social networks. Organizational Dynamics, 30(2), 100–120. doi:10.1016/S0090-2616(01)00046-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, J. (2004). Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Science, 50(3), 352–364. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1030.0134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, J., Espinosa, J. A., & Pickering, C. K. (2009). Crossing spatial and temporal boundaries in globally distributed projects: A relational model of coordination delay. Information Systems Research, 20(3), 420–439. doi: 10.1287/isre.1090.0239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSanctis, G., & Monge, P. (1999). Introduction to the special issue: Communication processes for virtual organizations. Organization Science, 10(6), 693–703. doi: 10.1287/orsc.10.6.693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Droege, S. B., & Hoobler, J. M. (2003). Employee turnover and tacit knowledge diffusion: A network perspective. Journal of Managerial Issues, 15(1), 50–64.
   Google Scholar
• Duarte, D. L., & Snyder, N. T. (2006). Mastering virtual teams. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Espinosa, J. A., Cummings, J. N., Wilson, J. M., & Pearce, B. M. (2003). Team boundary issues across multiple global firms. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 157–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espinosa, J. A., Slaughter, S. A., & Pickering, C. K. (2012). Time separation, coordination, and performance in technical teams. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 59(1), 91–103. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2011.2126579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farzan, R., DiMicco, J. M., & Brownholtz, B. (2009). Spreading the honey: A system for maintaining an online community. Paper presented at the international conference on supporting group work, Sanibel Island, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Finholt, T., & Sproull, L. (1990). Electronic groups at work. Organization Science, 1(1), 41–64. doi:10.1287/orsc.1.1.41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonner, K. L., & Roloff, M. E. (2010). Why teleworkers are more satisfied with their jobs than are office-based workers: When less contact is beneficial. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38(4), 336–361. doi: 10.1080/00909882.2010.513998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbraith, J. R. (1974). Organization design: An information processing view. Interfaces, 4(3), 28–36. doi: dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.4.3.28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, J. L., Nekrassova, D., Grushina, Y., & Abdul Wahab, S. (2008). Reconceptualizing virtual teaming from a constitutive perspective: Review, redirection, and research agenda. In C. S. Beck (Ed.), Communication yearbook 32 (pp. 187–229). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, C. B., & Cohen, S. G. (2003). Virtual teams that work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, C. B., & Gibbs, J. L. (2006). Unpacking the concept of virtuality: The effects of geographic dispersion, electronic dependence, dynamic structure, and national diversity on team innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 451–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, C. B., Huang, L., Kirkman, B. L., & Shapiro, D. L. (2014). Where global and virtual meet: The value of examining the intersection of these elements in twenty-first-century teams. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 217–244. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091240
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, T. L., Sawyer, J. E., & Neale, M. A. (2003). Virtualness and knowledge in teams: Managing the love triangle of organizations, individuals, and information technology. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 265–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Guinea, A. O., Webster, J., & Staples, D. S. (2012). A meta-analysis of the consequences of virtualness on team functioning. Information and Management, 49(6), 301–308. doi:10.1016/j.im.2012.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, M. T., Mors, M. L., & Lovas, B. (2005). Knowledge sharing in organizations: Multiple networks, multiple phases. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 776–793. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2005.18803922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington, S. J., & Guimaraes, T. (2005). Corporate culture, absorptive capacity and IT success. Information and Organization, 15(1), 39–63. doi: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2004.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Hau, K. T., & Marsh, H. W. (2004). The use of item parcels in structural equation modelling: Non-normal data and small sample sizes. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 57(2), 327–351. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.2004.tb00142.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayduk, L. A. (1987). Structural equation modeling with LISREL: Essentials and advances. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haythornthwaite, C. (2002). Strong, weak, and latent ties and the impact of new media. The Information Society, 18, 385–401. doi:10.1080/01972240290108195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haythornthwaite, C. (2005). Social networks and Internet connectivity effects. Information, Communication & Society, 8(2), 125–147. doi:10.1080/13691180500146185
   Google Scholar
• Heinz, M., & Rice, R. E. (2009). An integrated model of knowledge sharing in contemporary communication environments (Vol. 33). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, P. (1999). Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing. Knowledge and Process Management, 6(2), 91–100. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1441(199906)6:2<91::AID-KPM54>3.0.CO;2-M
   Google Scholar
• Hertel, G., Geister, S., & Konradt, U. (2005). Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management, 15(1). doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2005.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Hinds, P. J., & Weisband, S. P. (2003). Knowledge sharing and shared understanding in virtual teams. In C. B. Gibson & S. G. Cohen (Eds.), Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness (pp. 21–36). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Hollingshead, A., Fulk, J., & Monge, P. (2001). Fostering intranet knowledge sharing: An integration of transactive memory and public goods approaches. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work: New research on working across distance using technology (pp. 335–355). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa, S. L. (2000). The use of collaborative electronic media for information sharing: An exploratory study of determinants. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9(2–3), 129–154. doi: 10.1016/S0963-8687(00)00042-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, K. W., Hakonsson, D. D., Burton, R. M., & Obel, B. (2009). Embedding virtuality into organization design theory: Virtuality and its information processing consequences. In A. Bollingtoft, D. D. Hakonsson, J. F. Nielsen, C. C. Snow & J. P. Ulhoi (Eds.), New approaches to organization design (pp. 99–122). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. K., Bettenhausen, K., & Gibbons, E. (2009). Realities of working in virtual teams: Affective and attitudinal outcomes of using computer-mediated communication. Small Group Research, 40(6), 623–649. doi:10.1177/1046496409346448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joreskog, K., & Sorbom, D. (1998). Lisrel 8: User's reference guide. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Katzy, B. (1998). Design and implementation of virtual organizations. Paper presented at the thirty-first Hawaii international conference on human system sciences, Kohala Coast, HI.
   Google Scholar
• Kauppila, O., Rajala, R., & Jyrämä, A. (2011). Knowledge sharing through virtual teams across borders and boundaries. Management Learning, 42(4), 395–418. doi:10.1177/1350507610389685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiesler, S., & Cummings, J. (2002). What do we know about proximity and distance in work groups? In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 57–80). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• King, N., & Majchrzak, A. (2003). Technology alignment and adaptation for virtual teams involved in unstructured knowledge work. In C. B. Gibson & S. G. Cohen (Eds.), Virtual teams that work (pp. 265–291). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkman, B. L., Cordery, J. L., Mathieu, J. E., Rosen, B., & Kukenberger, M. (2013). Global organizational communities of practice: The effects of national diversity, psychological safety, and media richness on community performance. Human Relations, 66(3), 333–362. doi:10.1177/0018726712464076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkman, B. L., & Mathieu, J. E. (2005). The dimensions and antecedents of team virtuality. Journal of Management, 31(5), 700–718. doi: 10.1177/0149206305279113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, J. A., & Kleinhanns, A. (2003). Closing the time gap in virtual teams. In C. B. Gibson & S. G. Cohen (Eds.), Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness (pp. 381–399). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Lau, H. C. W., Chin, K. S., Pun, K. F., & Ning, A. (2000). Decision supporting functionality in a virtual enterprise network. Expert Systems with Applications, 19(4), 261–270. doi:10.1016/S0957-4174(00)00038-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardi, P., Treem, J. W., & Jackson, M. H. (2010). The connectivity paradox: Using technology to both decrease and increase perceptions of distance in distributed work arrangements. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38(1), 85–105. doi:10.1080/00909880903483599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majchrzak, A., Rice, R. E., Malhotra, A., King, N., & Ba, S. (2000). Technology adaptation: The case of a computer-support inter-organizational virtual team. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 569–600. doi: 10.2307/3250948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majumdar, A. (2011). Social computing implications for technology usage and team interactions in virtual teams. Paper presented at the 7th international conference on collaborative computing: Networking, applications and worksharing (CollaborateCom), Orlando, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Malhotra, A., & Majchrzak, A. (2012). How virtual teams use their virtual workspace to coordinate knowledge. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 3(1), 1–14. doi:10.1145/2151163.2151169
   Google Scholar
• Mansour, O., Abusalah, M., & Askenäs, L. (2011). Wiki collaboration in organizations: An exploratory study. Paper presented at the international conference on communities and technologies, Brisbane.
   Google Scholar
• Martins, L. L., Gilson, L. L., & Maynard, M. T. (2004). Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 805–835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maznevski, M. L., & Chudoba, K. M. (2000). Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organization Science, 11, 473–492. doi: 10.1287/orsc.11.5.473.15200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCallister, L., & Fischer, C. S. (1978). A procedure for surveying personal networks. Sociological Methods & Research, 7(2), 131–148. doi:10.1177/004912417800700202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monge, P., & Contractor, N. S. (2003). Theories of communication networks. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nardi, B. A., & Whittaker, S. (2002). The place of face-to-face communication in distributed work. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 83–110). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, J. G. (1999). Leadership processes in virtual teams and organizations. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 5(3), 3–17. doi: 10.1177/107179199900500301
   Google Scholar
• Oh, H., Chung, M.-H., & Labianca, G. (2004). Group social capital and group effectiveness: The role of informal socializing ties. The Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 860–875. doi: 10.2307/20159627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Leary, M. B., & Cummings, J. (2007). The spatial, temporal, and configurational characteristics of geographic dispersion in teams. MIS Quarterly, 31(3), 433–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2000). Distance matters. Human–Computer Interaction, 15(2), 139–178. doi: 10.1207/S15327051HCI1523_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith, J. E., & Shalley, C. E. (2003). The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 89–106. doi:10.5465/AMR.2003.8925236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, R. E., & Leonardi, P. (2013). Information and communication technology use in organizations. In L. Putnam & D. Mumby (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational communication (pp. 425–448). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Riopelle, K., Gluesing, J., Alcordo, T., Baba, M., Britt, D., McKether, W., … Wagner, K. H. (2003). Context, task, and the evolution of technology use in global virtual teams. In C. B. Gibson & S. G. Cohen (Eds.), Virtual teams that work (pp. 239–264). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Sarker, S., Ahuja, M. K., Sarker, S., & Kirkeby, S. (2011). The role of communication and trust in global virtual teams: A social network perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(1), 273–310. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222280109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, C., Van Slyke, C., & Vogel, D. R. (2004). My time or yours? Managing time visions in global virtual teams. Academy of Management Executive, 18(1), 19–31. doi: 10.5465/AME.2004.12691177
   Google Scholar
• Scott, C. R., & Timmerman, C. E. (1999). Communication technology use and multiple workplace identifications among organizational teleworkers with varied degrees of virtuality. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 42(4), 240–260. doi: 10.1109/47.807961
   Google Scholar
• Shin, Y. (2005). Conflict resolution in virtual teams. Organizational Dynamics, 34(4), 331–345. doi: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2005.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sole, D., & Edmondson, A. (2002). Situated knowledge and learning in dispersed teams. British Journal of Management, 13(S2), S17–S34. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.13.s2.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmerman, C. E., & Scott, C. R. (2006). Virtually working: Communicative and structural predictors of media use and key outcomes in virtual work teams. A previous version of this work was presented as a top 3 paper in the organizational communication division at the international communication association annual conference, New Orleans, LA (May 2004). Communication Monographs, 73(1), 108–136. doi: 10.1080/03637750500534396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheaton, B., Muthen, B., Alwin, D. F., & Summers, G. F. (1977). Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. In D. R. Heise (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 84–136). San Francisco, CA: Joseey-Bass.
   Google Scholar