497
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Science and policy: scientific expertise and individual participation in boundary management

, &
Pages 78-95 | Received 15 Sep 2014, Accepted 26 Feb 2015, Published online: 18 Feb 2016

References

  • Acemoglu, D. (2009). The crisis of 2008: Lessons for an from economics. Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society, 21(2–3), 185–194. doi: 10.1080/08913810902933788
  • Ahmed, M. (2005). Bridging research and policy. Journal of International Development, 17(6), 765–773. doi:10.1002/jid.1239
  • Berkes, F. (2009). Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1692–1702. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.001
  • Borgenschneider, K., & Corbett, T. (2010). Evidence-based policymaking: Insights from policy-minded researchers and research-minded policymakers. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Box, S., & Cotgrove, S. (1966). Scientific identity, occupational selection, and role strain. British Journal of Sociology, 1, 20–28. doi: 10.2307/588430
  • Brown, V. A., Harris, J. A., & Russell, J. Y. (2010) Tackling wicked problems through the transdisciplinary imagination. London: Earthscan.
  • Cash, D. W., Clark, W. C., Alcock, F., Dickson, N. M., Eckley, N., Guston, D. H., & Mitchell, R. B. (2003). Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(14), 8086–8091.
  • Cash, D. W., & Moser, S. C. (2000). Linking global and local scales: Designing dynamic assessment and management processes. Global Environmental Change, 10(2), 109–120. doi:10.1016/S0959-3780(00)00017-0
  • Cherwitz, R. (2010). Viewpoint: The challenged of creating engaged public research universities. Planning for Higher Education, 38(4), 61–64.
  • Clark, W. C., Tomich, T. P., van Noordwijk, M., Guston, D., Catacutan, D., Dickson, N. M., & McNie, E. (2001). Boundary work for sustainable development: Natural resource management at the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). Retrieved September 22, 2013, from http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/9774653/Clark-BoundaryWork.pdf?sequence=1
  • Cortner, H. J. (2000). Making science relevant to environmental policy. Environmental Science & Policy, 3(1), 21–30. doi: 10.1016/S1462-9011(99)00042-8
  • Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  • Crona, B. I., & Parker, J. N. (2011). Network determinants of knowledge utilization preliminary lessons from a boundary organization. Science Communication, 33(4), 448–471. doi: 10.1177/1075547011408116
  • Crona, B. I., & Parker, J. N. (2012). Learning in support of governance: Theories, methods, and a framework to assess how bridging organizations contribute to adaptive resource governance. Ecology and Society, 17(1), 32. doi: 10.5751/ES-04534-170132
  • Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2008). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. New York City, NY: Wiley & Sons.
  • Gregory, J. (2011). Science communication. In D. Hook, B. Franks, & M. W. Bauer (Eds.), The social psychology of communication (pp. 300–315). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Guston, D. H. (1999). Stabilizing the boundary between US politics and science: The role of the office of technology transfer as a boundary organization. Social Studies of Science, 29(1), 87–111. doi: 10.1177/030631299029001004
  • Guston, D. H. (2001). Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: An introduction. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 26(4), 399–408. doi: 10.1177/016224390102600401
  • Hilgartner, S. (2000). Science on stage: Expert advice as public drama. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Holmes, J., & Clark, R. (2008). Enhancing the use of science in environmental policy-making and regulation. Environmental Science & Policy, 11(8), 702–711. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2008.08.004
  • Informing decisions in a changing climate. (2009). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • Jaffe, K., Caicedo, M., Manzanares, M., Gil, M., Rios, A., Florez, A., … Davila, V. (2013). Productivity in physical and chemical science predicts the future growth of developing countries better than other popular indices. PLoS ONE, 8(6), e66239. doi:10.1271/journal.pone.0066239
  • Jasanoff, S. S. (1987). Contested boundaries in policy-relevant science. Social Studies of Science, 17(2), 195–230. doi:10.1177/030631287017002001
  • Jones, S. A., Fischhoff, B., & Lach, D. (1999). Evaluating the science-policy interface for climate change research. Climatic Change, 43(3), 581–599.
  • Landry, R., Lamari, M., & Amara, N. (2003). The extent and the determinants of the utilization of university research in government agencies. Public Administration Review, 63(2), 191–205. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00279
  • Lederbogen, U., & Trebbe, J. (2003). Promoting science on the web: Public relations for scientific organizations—results of a content analysis. Science Communication, 24(3), 333–352. doi:10.1177/1075547002250299
  • Maine Development Foundation. (2013). Making Maine work: Growing Maine's workforce. Augusta, ME: Author.
  • McGreavy, B., Hutchins, K., Smith, H., Lindenfeld, L., & Silka, L. (2013). Addressing the complexities of boundary work in sustainability science through communication. Sustainability, 5(10), 4195–4221. doi: 10.3390/su5104195
  • Miller, C. (2001). Hybrid management: Boundary organizations, science policy, and environmental governance in the climate regime. Science, Technology & Human Values, 26(4), 478–500. doi: 10.1177/016224390102600405
  • Nutley, S. (2003, April 23). Bridging the policy/research divide: Reflections and lessons from the UK. Paper presented at the facing the future: engaging stakeholders and citizens in developing public policy, Canberra.
  • Osmond, D. L., Nadkami, N. M., Driscoll, C. T., Andrews, E., Gold, A. J., Allred, S. R. B.,  … Groffman, P. M. (2010). The role of interface organizations in science communication and understanding. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, (8), 306–313. doi: 10.1890/090145
  • Parker, J., & Crona, B. (2012). On being all things to all people: Boundary organizations and the contemporary research university. Social Studies of Science, 42(2), 262–289. doi: 10.1177/0306312711435833
  • Pfirman, S., Martin, P., Berry, L., Fletcher, M., Hempel, M., Southard, R., … Morehouse, B. (2010). Interdisciplinary hiring, tenure and promotion: Guidance for individuals and institutions. Washington, DC: Council of Environmental Deans and Directors.
  • Pielke, R. A. (2007). The honest broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 188.
  • Reich, S., & Reich, J. (2006). Cultural competence in interdisciplinary collaboration: A method for respecting diversity in research partnerships. American Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 51–62. doi: 10.1007/s10464-006-9064-1
  • Sarewitz, D., & Pielke, R. A. (2007). The neglected heart of science policy: Reconciling supply of and demand for science. Environmental Science & Policy, 10(1), 5–16. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2006.10.001
  • Schultz, L., Folke, C., & Olsson, P. (2007). Enhancing ecosystem management through social-ecological inventories: Lessons from Kristianstad Vattenrike, Sweden. Environmental Conservation, 34(2), 140–152. doi:10.1017/S0376892907003876
  • Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19, 287–420. doi: 10.1177/030631289019003001
  • Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur's quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2013). State & county quickfacts: Maine. Retrieved February 6, 2014, from http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/23000.html
  • Whitmer, A., Ogden, L., Lawton, J., Sturner, P., Groffman, P. M., Schneider, L., … Killilea, M. (2010). The engaged university: Providing a platform for research that transforms society. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 8(6), 314–321. doi:10.1890/090241

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.