Unpacking the dimensions of organizational tension: the case of sexual violence response and prevention among college students

References

• Ahrens, C. E. (2006). Being silenced: The impact of negative social reactions on the disclosure of rape. American Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 263–274. doi: 10.1007/s10464-006-9069-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, R. (2011). Dear colleague letter: Sexual violence. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/dear_colleague_sexual_violence.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Barri, F. R. (2009). College crime: A statistical study of offenses on American campuses. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Basile, K. C., Smith, S. G., Breiding, M. J., Black, M. C., & Mahendra, R. R. (2014). Sexual violence surveillance: Uniform definitions and recommended data elements, version 2.0. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. A., & Montgomery, B. M. (1996). Relating: Dialogues & dialectics. New York, NY: Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beres, M. A., Senn, C. Y., & McCaw, J. (2014). Navigating ambivalence: How heterosexual young adults make sense of desire differences. Journal of Sex Research, 51, 765–776. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2013.792327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, M. C., Basile, K. C., Breiding, M. J., Smith, S. G., Walters, M. L., Merrick, M. T., … Stevens, M. R. (2011). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey: 2010 Summary Report. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, E. J., Poole, M. S., Lambert, N. J., & Lammers, J. C. (2016). A study of organizational responses to dilemmas in interorganizational emergency management. Communication Research, 44, 287–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmeli, A., Dutton, J. E., & Hardin, A. E. (2015). Respect as an engine for new ideas: Linking respectful engagement, relational information processing and creativity among employees and teams. Human Relations, 68, 1021–1047. doi: 10.1177/0018726714550256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, A. E. (2003). Situational analyses: Grounded theory mapping after the postmodern turn. Symbolic Interaction, 26, 553–576. doi: 10.1525/si.2003.26.4.553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooren, F., Matte, F., Benoit-Barné, C., & Brummans, B. H. J. M. (2013). Communication as ventriloquism: A grounded-in-action approach to the study of organizational tensions. Communication Monographs, 80, 255–277. doi: 10.1080/03637751.2013.788255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempsey, S. E., & Barge, J. K. (2014). Engaged scholarship and democracy. In L. L. Putnam & D. K. Mumby (Eds.), The sage handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 665–688). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• D’Enbeau, S. (2011). Transnational feminist advocacy online: Identity (re)creation through diversity, transparency, and co-construction. Women’s Studies in Communication, 34, 64–83. doi: 10.1080/07491409.2011.566528
   Google Scholar
• D’Enbeau, S., & Buzzanell, P. M. (2011). Selling (out) feminism: Sustainability of ideology-viability tensions in a competitive marketplace. Communication Monographs, 78, 27–52. doi: 10.1080/03637751.2010.542472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Enbeau, S., & Kunkel, A. (2013). (Mis)managed empowerment: Exploring paradoxes of practice in domestic violence prevention. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 41, 141–159. doi: 10.1080/00909882.2013.770903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dougherty, D. S. (2006). Gendered constructions of power during discourse about sexual harassment: Negotiating competing meanings. Sex Roles, 54, 495–507. doi: 10.1007/s11199-006-9012-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, B. S., Daigle, L. E., & Cullen, F. T. (2010). Unsafe in the Ivory tower: The sexual victimization of college women. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, B., Marler, L. E., Hester, K., & Otondo, R. F. (2015). Leader reactions to follower proactive behavior: Giving credit when credit is due. Human Relations, 68, 879–898. doi: 10.1177/0018726714548235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. K. (2012). Performance pressure as a double-edged sword: Enhancing team motivation but undermining the use of team knowledge. Administrative Science Quarterly, 57, 1–46. doi: 10.1177/0001839212446454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, K. L. (2013). Organizing sexual violence: Communicative, intersectional dilemmas around mandated reporting. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Database (UMI No. 3607312).
   Google Scholar
• Iverson, S. (2016). A policy discourse analysis of sexual assault policies in higher education. In S. C. Wooten & R. W. Mitchell (Eds.), The crisis of campus sexual violence: Critical perspectives on prevention and response (pp. 15–32). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jozkowski, K. N., & Peterson, Z. D. (2013). College students and sexual consent: Unique insights. Journal of Sex Research, 50, 517–523. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2012.700739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiss, A., & Feeney White, K. N. (2016). Looking beyond the numbers: Understanding the Jeanne Clery Act and sexual violence. In S. C. Wooten & R. W. Mitchell (Eds.), The crisis of campus sexual violence: Critical perspectives on prevention and response (pp. 95–112). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger, C., & Frith, H. (1999). Just say no? The use of conversation analysis in developing a feminist perspective on sexual refusal. Discourse & Society, 10, 293–316. doi: 10.1177/0957926599010003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koschmann, M., & Laster, N. M. (2011). Communicative tensions of community organizing: The case of a local neighborhood association. Western Journal of Communication, 75, 28–51. doi: 10.1080/10570314.2010.536965
   Google Scholar
• Krebs, C. P., Lindquist, C. H., Warner, T. D., Fisher, B. S., & Martin, S. L. (2007). The campus sexual assault (CSA) study. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U. S. Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, K., & D’Enbeau, S. (2013). Moving beyond themes: Reimagining the qualitative analysis curriculum. Qualitative Communication Research, 2, 213–227. doi: 10.1525/qcr.2013.2.2.213
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, T., Dougherty, D. S., & Atkinson, J. (2006). “Paradoxing the dialectic”: The impact of patients’ sexual harassment in the discursive construction of nurses’ caregiving roles. Management Communication Quarterly, 19, 416–450. doi: 10.1177/0893318905280879
   Google Scholar
• Misner, J. (2014, September 29). California shifts to “yes means yes” standard for college sex. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/California-Shifts-to-Yes/149057/
   Google Scholar
• Norander, S., & Harter, L. M. (2011). Reflexivity in practice: Challenges and potentials of transnational organizing. Management Communication Quarterly, 26, 74–105. doi: 10.1177/0893318911415607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, L. L., Fairhurst, G. T., & Banghart, S. (2016). Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: A constitutive approach. Academy of Management Annals, 10, 65–171. doi: 10.1080/19416520.2016.1162421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, B. K., & Taylor, J. (2009). Sexual harassment at the intersection of race and gender: A theoretical model of the sexual harassment experiences of women of color. Western Journal of Communication, 73, 248–272. doi: 10.1080/10570310903082065
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B., & Conrad, C. (1992). Narratives of sexual harassment: Organizational dimensions. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 20, 401–418. doi: 10.1080/00909889209365346
   Google Scholar
• The White House Task Force to Protect Students from Sexual Assault. (2014). Not Alone. Retrieved from https://www.notalone.gov/assets/report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2004). Dialectic, contradiction, or double bind? Analyzing and theorizing employee reactions to organizational tension. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32, 119–146. doi: 10.1080/0090988042000210025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16, 837–851. doi: 10.1177/1077800410383121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Trethewey, A., & Ashcraft, K. L. (2004). Practicing disorganization: The development of applied perspectives on living with tension. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32, 81–88. doi: 10.1080/0090988042000210007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, M. L., Chen, J., & Breiding, M. J. (2013). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 Findings on Victimization by Sexual Orientation. Retrieved from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control: http://www.cdc.gov/ViolencePrevention/pdf/NISVS_SOfindings.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. (2015, August 11). Colleges under investigation for sexual assault wonder what getting it right looks like. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://chronicle.com/article/Colleges-Under-Investigation/232205/?key=HT8mJQJoNSYXZHsyaT4XM2lcP3E/ZB8na3cdPy8mblBTFw==
   Google Scholar
• Wooten, S. C., & Mitchell, R. W. (2016). Introduction. In S. C. Wooten & R. W. Mitchell (Eds.), The crisis of campus sexual violence: Critical perspectives on prevention and response (pp. 1–11). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar