Making time/making temporality for engaged scholarship

References

• Ancona, D., & Chong, C. (1996). Entrainment: Pace, cycle, and rhythm in organizational behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 18, 251–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ancona, D. G., Okhuysen, G. A., & Perlow, L. A. (2001). Taking time to integrate temporal research. Academy of Management Review, 26, 512–529. doi: 10.2307/3560239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballard, D. I. (2009). Organizational temporality over time: Activity cycles as sources of entrainment. In R. Roe, M. J. Waller, & S. R. Clegg (Eds.), Time in organizational research (pp. 204–219). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, D. I., Inman-Ramgolam, D., & Solomon Gray, E. (2017). Modern times, modern spaces: Interaction genres and multiminding in network-based work. In D. I. Ballard, & M. S. McGlone (Eds.), Work pressures: New agendas in communication (pp. 91–108). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, D. I., & McVey, T. (2014). Measure twice, cut once: The temporality of communication design. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 42, 190–207. doi: 10.1080/00909882.2013.874571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballard, D. I., & Seibold, D. R. (2003). Communicating and organizing in time: A meso level model of organizational temporality. Management Communication Quarterly, 16, 380–415. doi: 10.1177/0893318902238896
   Google Scholar
• Ballard, D. I., & Seibold, D. R. (2004). Organizational members’ communication and temporal experience: Scale development and validation. Communication Research, 31, 135–172. doi: 10.1177/0093650203261504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballard, D. I., & Seibold, D. R. (2006). The experience of time at work: Relationship to communication load, job satisfaction, and interdepartmental communication. Communication Studies, 57, 317–340. doi: 10.1080/10510970600845974
   Google Scholar
• Barbour, J. B., & Gill, R. (2014). Designing communication for the day-to-day safety oversight of nuclear power plants. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 42, 168–189. doi: 10.1080/00909882.2013.859291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbour, J. B., & James, E. P. (2015). Collaboration for compliance: Identity tensions in the interorganizational regulation of a toxic waste facility. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 43, 363–384. doi: 10.1080/00909882.2015.1083601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barge, J. K. (2015). Consulting as collaborative co-inquiry. In G. R. Bushe & R. J. Marshak (Eds.), Dialogic organization development: The theory and practice of transformational change (pp. 177–194). Oakland, CA: Berret-Koehler.
   Google Scholar
• Barge, J. K., Barbour, J. B., & Isaacson, K. (2014). Playing the prosperity game: Assessing the impact of large group interventions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Barge, J. K., Lee, M., Maddux, K., Nabring, R., & Townsend, B. (2008). Managing dualities in planned change initiatives. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36, 364–391. doi: 10.1080/00909880802129996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barge, J. K., & Shockley-Zalabak, P. (2008). Engaged scholarship and the creation of useful organizational knowledge. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36, 251–265. doi: 10.1080/00909880802172277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deetz, S. (2008). Engagement as co-generative theorizing. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36, 289–297. doi: 10.1080/00909880802172301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempsey, S., & Barge, J. K. (2014). Engaged scholarship as democratic conversation. In L. L. Putnam & D. K. Mumby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 665–688). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, R., Zorn, T. E., Balli, F., Marsh, K., Caughney, T., Child, R., & O'Brien, R. (2016). GrowNorth smart innovation district: Initial report. Retrieved from http://www.massey.ac.nz/massey/fms/Colleges/CollegeofBusiness/GrowNorth/GrowNorthReportMay2016.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, L. K., & Seibold, D. R. (1998). Reconceptualizing organizational change implementation as a communication problem: A review of literature and research agenda. Communication Yearbook, 21, 92–151.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, P. L. (2009). The pracademic: An agenda for re-engaging practitioners and academics. Public Budgeting & Finance, 29, 12–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5850.2009.00921.x
   Google Scholar
• Seeger, M. W. (2009). Does communication research make a difference: Reconsidering the impact of our work. Communication Monographs, 76, 12–19. doi: 10.1080/03637750802684006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibold, D. R. (2005). Bridging theory and practice in organizational communication. In J. L. Simpson & P. Shockley-Zalabak (Eds.), Engaging communication, transforming organizations: Scholarship of engagement in action (pp. 13–44). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seibold, D. R. (2016a). Facilitating team development in embedded organizational work groups. In J. Waldeck & D. R. Seibold (Eds.), Consulting that matters: A handbook for scholars and practitioners (pp. 197–216). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Seibold, D. R. (2016b). Perspective on organizational consulting: Personal reflections and a design approach. In J. Waldeck & D. R. Seibold (Eds.), Consulting that matters: A handbook for scholars and practitioners (pp. 11–30). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, J. L., & Seibold, D. R. (2008). Practical engagements and co-created research. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36, 266–280. doi: 10.1080/00909880802172285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A. H., & Johnson, P. (2006). Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 31, 802–821. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2006.22527385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar