Structuration processes in an interagency collaboration: enabling and constraining participation and efficiency

References

• Barringer, B. R., & Harrison, J. S. (2000). Walking a tightrope: Creating value through interorganizational relationships. Journal of Management, 26, 367–403. doi: 10.1177/014920630002600302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social tehory: Action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley, CA: Univesity of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, R. G. (2007). Rethinking community collaboration through a dialogic lens: Creativity, democracy, and diversity in community organizing. Management Communication Quarterly, 21, 145–171. doi: 10.1177/0893318907306032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyton, J., Ford, D. J., & Smith, F. L. (2008). A mesolevel communicative model of collaboration. Communication Theory, 18, 376–406. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00327.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyton, J., & Stallworth, V. (2003). On the verge of collaboration: Interaction processes versus group outcomes. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), Group communication in context: Studies of bona fide groups (pp. 235–260). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kirby, E. L., & Krone, K. J. (2002). The policy exists but you can't really use it: Communication and the structuration of work-family policies. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30, 50–77. doi: 10.1080/00909880216577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koschmann, M. A. (2013). The communicative constitution of collective identity in interorganizational collaboration. Management Communication Quarterly, 27, 61–89. doi: 10.1177/0893318912449314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, L. K. (2006). Collaborative interaction: Review of communication scholarship and a research agenda. In C. S. Beck (Ed.), Communication yearbook 30 (Vol. 30, pp. 197–247). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, L. K., Isbell, M. G., & Koschmann, M. (2010). Collaborative tensions: Practitioners’ experiences of interorganizational relationships. Communication Monographs, 77, 460–479. doi: 10.1080/03637751.2010.523605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2011). Qualitative communication research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, K., Scott, C. R., Stage, C., & Birkholt, M. (1995). Communication and coordination in an interorganizational system: Service provision for the urban homeless. Communication Research, 22, 679–699. doi: 10.1177/009365095022006006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mingers, J. (1996). A comparison of Maturana’s autopoietic social theory and Giddens’ theory of structuration. Systems Research, 13, 469–482. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1735(199612)13:4<469::AID-SRES81>3.0.CO;2-I
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, C. (1990). Determinants of interorganizational relationships: Integration and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 15, 241–265. doi: 10.5465/amr.1990.4308156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomerol, J.-C. (2013). Decision-making and action. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Poole, M. S. (1999). Group communication theory. In L. R. Frey, D. S. Gouran, & M. S. Poole (Eds.), The handbook of group communication theory and research (pp. 37–70). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Poole, M. S. (2013). Structuration research on group communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 27, 607–614. doi: 10.1177/0893318913506265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole, M. S., & DeSanctis, G. (2004). Structuration theory in information systems research: Methods and controversies. In M. E. Whitman & A. B. Woszczynski (Eds.), The handbook of information systems research (pp. 206–249). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Poole, M. S., DeSanctis, G., Kirsh, L., & Jackson, M. (1995). Group decision support systems as facilitators of quality team efforts. In L. R. Frey (Eds.), Innovations in group facilitation techniques: Applications in natural settings (pp. 299–321). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poole, M. S., Seibold, D. R., & McPhee, R. D. (1985). Group decision-making as a structurational process. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 71, 74–102. doi: 10.1080/00335638509383719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibold, D. R., & Meyers, R. A. (2007). Group argument: A structuration perspective and research program. Small Group Research, 38, 312–336. doi: 10.1177/1046496407301966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibold, D. R., Meyers, R. A., & Shoham, M. D. (2010). Social influence in groups and organizations. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Vlaar, P. W. L., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Coping with problems of understanding in interorganizational relationships: Using formalization as a means to make sense. Organization Studies, 27, 1617–1638. doi: 10.1177/0170840606068338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlaar, P. W. L., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2007). Towards a dialectic perspective on formalization in interorganizational relationships: How alliance managers capitalize on the duality inherent in contracts, rules and procedures. Organization Studies, 28, 437–466. doi: 10.1177/0170840607078003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whetten, D. A. (1981). Interorganizational relations: A review of the field. The Journal of Higher Education, 52, 1–28. doi: 10.1080/00221546.1981.11780112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar