665
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A structurational group decision-making perspective on the commons dilemma: results from an online public goods gameFootnote

, , &
Pages 413-428 | Received 30 Nov 2016, Accepted 20 Apr 2017, Published online: 21 Aug 2017

References

  • Antonioni, A., Cacault, M. P., Lalive, R., & Tomassini, M. (2013). Coordination on networks: Does topology matter? PLoS One, 8(2), e55033. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055033
  • Borgatti, S. P., & Halgin, D. S. (2011). On network theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 1168–1181. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1100.0641
  • Bormann, E. G. (1972). Fantasy and rhetorical vision: The rhetorical criticism of social reality. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 58(4), 396–407. doi: 10.1080/00335637209383138
  • Brewer, M. B., & Kramer, R. M. (1986). Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(3), 543–549. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.543
  • Castells, M. (2009). Communication power. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Collins, R. (1981). On the microfoundations of macrosociology. American Journal of Sociology, 86(5), 984–1014. doi: 10.1086/227351
  • Contractor, N. S., & Seibold, D. S. (1993). Theoretical frameworks for the study of structuring processes in group decision support systems: Adaptive structuration theory and self-organizing systems theory. Human Communication Research, 19, 528–563. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1993.tb00312.x
  • Cookson, R. (2000). Framing effects in public goods experiments. Experimental Economics, 3(1), 55–79. doi: 10.1023/A:1009994008166
  • Craig, R. T. (1999). Communication theory as a field. Communication Theory, 9(2), 119–161. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00355.x
  • Enemark, D., McCubbins, M. D., & Weller, N. (2014). Knowledge and networks: An experimental test of how network knowledge affects coordination. Social Networks, 36, 122–133. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2012.10.001
  • Eshel, I., Samuelson, L., & Shaked, A. (1998). Altruists, egoists, and hooligans in a local interaction model. American Economic Review, 88(1) 157–179.
  • Fairhurst, G. T. (2007). Discursive leadership: In conversation with leadership psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Fairhurst, G. T., & Putnam, L. (2004). Organizations as discursive constructions. Communication Theory, 14(1), 5–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00301.x
  • Fulk, J., Flanagin, A. J., Kalman, M. E., Monge, P. R., & Ryan, T. (1996). Connective and communal public goods in interactive communication systems. Communication Theory, 6(1), 60–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.1996.tb00120.x
  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Gouran, D. S. (1991). Rational approaches to decision-making and problem-solving discussion. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 77(3), 343–358. doi: 10.1080/00335639109383966
  • Hardy, C., Lawrence, T. B., & Grant, D. (2005). Discourse and collaboration: The role of conversations and collective identity. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 58–77. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2005.15281426
  • Hoffman, L. (2014). Longitudinal analysis: Modeling within-person fluctuation and change. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Hogg, M. A., & Reid, S. A. (2006). Social identity, self-categorization, and the communication of group norms. Communication Theory, 16(1), 7–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00003.x
  • Kopelman, S., Weber, J. M., & Messick, D. M. (2002). Factors influencing cooperation in social dilemmas: A review of experimental psychological research. In E. Ostrom, T. Dietz, N. Dolsak, P. C. Stern, S. Stonich, & E. U. Weber (Eds.), The drama of the commons (pp. 113–156). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Koschmann, M. A. (2012). Developing a communicative theory of the nonprofit. Management Communication Quarterly, 26(1), 139–146. doi: 10.1177/0893318911423640
  • Lammers, J. C., & Barbour, J. B. (2006). An institutional theory of organizational communication. Communication Theory, 16, 356–377. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00274.x
  • Lang, A. (2000). The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication, 50(1), 46–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02833.x
  • Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1991). Computer-mediated communication, de-individuation and group decision-making. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34(2), 283–301. doi: 10.1016/0020-7373(91)90045-9
  • Leonardi, P. M. (2017). How to build high impact theories of organizational communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 31(1), 123–129. doi: 10.1177/0893318916675426
  • Melucci, A. (1995). The process of collective identity. Social Movements and Culture, 4, 41–63. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511520891.006
  • Monge, P., & Contractor, N. (2003). Theories of communication networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Mumby, D. K. (1989). Ideology & the social construction of meaning: A communication perspective. Communication Quarterly, 37(4), 291–304. doi: 10.1080/01463378909385551
  • Obradovich, N., & Guenther, S. M. (2016). Collective responsibility amplifies mitigation behaviors. Climatic Change, 137(1), 307–319. doi: 10.1007/s10584-016-1670-9
  • Oliver, P. (1980). Rewards and punishments as selective incentives for collective action: Theoretical investigations. American Journal of Sociology, 85, 1356–1375. doi: 10.1086/227168
  • Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Ostrom, E. (2014). Collective action and the evolution of social norms. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, 6(4), 235–252. doi:10.1080/19390459.2014.93517
  • Pavitt, C., McFeeters, C., Towey, E., & Zingerman, V. (2005). Communication during resource dilemmas: 1. Effects of different replenishment rates. Communication Monographs, 72(3), 345–363. doi: 10.1080/03637750500206482
  • Pavitt, C., Zingerman, V., Towey, E., & McFeeters, C. (2006). Communication during resource dilemmas: 2. Effects of harvest limit and reward asymmetry. Communication Research, 33, 64–91. doi: 10.1177/0093650205283102
  • Poole, M. S., & DeSanctis, G. (2004). Structuration theory in information systems research: Methods and controversies. In M. Whitman & A. Woszczynski (Eds.), The handbook of information systems research (pp. 206–249). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  • Poole, M. S., Seibold, D. R., & McPhee, R. D. (1985). Group decision-making as a structurational process. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 71(1), 74–102. doi: 10.1080/00335638509383719
  • Poole, M. S., Seibold, D. R., & McPhee, R. D. (1996). The structuration of group decisions. In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision making (2nd ed., pp. 114–146). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Skrondal, A. (2012). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata (3rd ed.). College Station, TX: STATA Press.
  • Radford, J., Pilny, A., Reichelmann, A., Keegan, B., Welles, B. F., Hoye, J., … Lazer, D. (2016). Volunteer science: An online laboratory for experiments in social psychology. Social Psychology Quarterly, 79(4), 376–396. doi: 10.1177/0190272516675866
  • Rege, M., & Telle, K. (2004). The impact of social approval and framing on cooperation in public good situations. Journal of Public Economics, 88(7–8), 1625–1644. doi: 10.1016/S0047-2727(03)00021-5
  • Rimal, R. N., & Real, K. (2005). How behaviors are influenced by perceived norms a test of the theory of normative social behavior. Communication Research, 32(3), 389–414. doi: 10.1177/0093650205275385
  • Seibold, D. R., & Meyers, R. A. (2007). Group argument: A structuration perspective and research program. Small Group Research, 38(3), 312–336. doi: 10.1177/1046496407301966
  • Seibold, D. R., & Myers, K. K. (2006). Communication as structuring. In G. J. Shepherd, J. St. John, & T. Striphas (Eds.), Communication as … perspectives on theory (pp. 143–152). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Seibold, D. R., & Thomas, R. W. (1994). Rethinking the role of interpersonal influence processes in alcohol intervention situations. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22, 177–197. doi: 10.1080/00909889409365396
  • StataCorp. (2015). Stata statistical software: Release 14. College Station, TX: Author.
  • Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Dolsak, N., Ostrom, E., & Stonich, S. (2002). Knowledge and questions after 15 years of research. In E. Ostrom (Eds.), The drama of the commons (pp. 445–489). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Sunwolf, & Seibold, D. R. (1998). Jurors’ intuitive rules for deliberation: A structurational approach to communication injury decision making. Communication Monographs, 65(4), 282–307. doi:10.1080/03637759809376455
  • Suri, S., & Watts, D. J. (2011). Cooperation and contagion in web-based, networked public goods experiments. PLoS One, 6(3), e16836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016836
  • Taylor, J. R. (1999). What is ‘organizational communication’? Communication as a dialogic of text and conversation. The Communication Review, 3(1–2), 21–63. doi: 10.1080/10714429909368573
  • Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393(6684), 440–442. doi: 10.1038/30918

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.