Advanced search
Publication Cover
Journal of Applied Communication Research Volume 45, 2017 - Issue 5
Submit an article Journal homepage
408
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Explicating the relationally attentive approach to conducting engaged communication scholarship

Stacey L. ConnaughtonThe Brian Lamb School of Communication, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USACorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
,
Jasmine R. LinabaryThe Brian Lamb School of Communication, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USAView further author information
,
Arunima KrishnaDepartment of Mass Communication, Advertising, and Public Relations, Boston University, Boston, MA, USAView further author information
,
Kai KuangDepartment of Communication Studies, Bloomsburg University, Bloomsburg, PA, USAView further author information
,
Agaptus AnaeleDepartment of Marketing Communication, Emerson College, Boston, MA, USAView further author information
,
Kelly S. VibberDepartment of Communication, University of Dayton, Dayton, OH, USAView further author information
,
Liliya YakovaInternational Council for Cultural Centers, Bread Houses Network, Sofia, BulgariaView further author information
&
Christina JonesDepartment of Nutrition and Health Science, Ball State University, Muncie, IN, USAView further author information
 show all
Pages 517-536 | Received 26 Jun 2016, Accepted 11 Jul 2017, Published online: 29 Sep 2017

References

  • Barge, J. K., & Shockley-Zalabak, P. (2008). Engaged scholarship and the creation of useful organizational knowledge. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36, 251–265. doi: 10.1080/00909880802172277
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  • Buzzanell, P. M. (Ed.). (2000). Rethinking organizational and managerial communication from feminist perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
  • Cheney, G. (2008). Encountering the ethics of engaged scholarship. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36, 281–288. doi: 10.1080/00909880802172293
  • Collier, M. J., & Lawless, B. (2016). Critically reflexive dialogue and praxis: Academic/practitioner reflections throughout a formative evaluation of circles® USA. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 44, 156–173. doi: 10.1080/00909882.2016.1155724
  • Connaughton, S. L., Kuang, K., & Yakova, L. (2017). Liberia’s pen-pen riders: A case study of a locally-driven, dialogic approach to transformation, peacebuilding and social change. In T. G. Matyok & P. M. Kellett (Eds.), Communication and conflict transformation: Local to global engagements (pp. 71–91). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
  • Deetz, S. A. (2006). The processes of dialogue: Participation and legitimation. Management Communication Quarterly, 19, 341–375. doi: 10.1177/0893318905282208
  • Deetz, S. A. (2008). Engagement as co-generative theorizing. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36, 289–297. doi: 10.1080/00909880802172301
  • Dempsey, S. E., & Barge, J. K. (2014). Engaged scholarship and democracy. In L. L. Putnam & D. K. Mumby (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 665–688). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Frey, L. R. (1998). Communication and social justice research: Truth, justice, and the applied communication way. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 26, 155–164. doi: 10.1080/00909889809365499
  • Gürkaynak, E. Ç, Dayton, B., & Paffenholz, T. (2009). Evaluation in conflict resolution and peacebuilding. In D. Sandole, S. Byrne, I. Sandole-Staroste, & J. Senehi (Eds.), Handbook of conflict analysis and resolution (pp. 286–299). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Jayawickrama, J. (2013). ‘If they can’t do any good, they shouldn’t come’: Northern evaluators in southern realities. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development, 8, 26–41. doi: 10.1080/15423166.2013.817743
  • Putnam, L. L., & Dempsey, S. E. (2015). The five faces of engaged scholarship: Implications for feminist research. Women & Language, 38, 11–22.
  • Putnam, L. L., Fairhurst, G. T., & Banghart, S. (2016). Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: A constitutive approach. Academy of Management Annals, 10, 65–171. doi: 10.1080/19416520.2016.1162421
  • Putnam, L. L., & Kolb, D. (2000). Rethinking negotiation: Feminist views of communication and exchange. In P. M. Buzzanell (Ed.), Rethinking organizational & managerial communication from feminist perspectives (pp. 76–105). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Simpson, J. L., & Seibold, D. R. (2008). Practical engagements and co-created research. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36, 266–280. doi: 10.1080/00909880802172285

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.