Predicting policy: exploring news attention to policy issues in electoral debates

References

• Airne, D., & Benoit, W. L. (2005). 2004 Illinois U.S. Senate debates. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(2), 343–352. doi: 10.1177/0002764205279721
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, M. A., & Kernell, S. (1999). Has cable ended the golden age of presidential television? American Political Science Review, 93(1), 99–114. doi: 10.2307/2585763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belt, T. L., Just, M. R., & Crigler, A. N. (2012). The 2008 media primary: Handicapping the candidates in newspapers, on TV, cable, and the internet. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 17(3), 341–369. doi: 10.1177/1940161212444124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. (2011). Content analysis in political communication. In E. P. Bucy & R. L. Holbert (Eds.), The sourcebook for political communication research (pp. 268–279). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L., Brazeal, L., & Airne, D. (2007). A functional analysis of televised U.S. Senate and gubernatorial campaign debates. Argumentation and Advocacy, 44, 75–89.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L., & Hansen, G. J. (2001). Presidential debate questions and the public agenda. Communication Quarterly, 49(2), 130–141. doi: 10.1080/01463370109385621
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L., & Hansen, G. J. (2004). Presidential debate watching, issue knowledge, character evaluation, and vote choice. Human Communication Research, 30(1), 121–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00727.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, B. I. (2001). Mediated electoral democracy: Campaigns, incentives, and reform. In W. L. Bennett & R. M. Entman (Eds.), Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy (pp. 362–379). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cappella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carlin, D. B., Morris, E., & Smith, S. (2001). The influence of format and questions on candidates’ strategic argument choices in the 2000 presidential debates. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 2196–2218. doi: 10.1177/00027640121958276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlin, D. B., Vigil, T., Buehler, S., & McDonald, K. (2009). The third agenda in U.S. Presidential debates: Debate watch and viewer reactions, 1996–2004. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, T. E. (2006). The news media as a political institution: Looking backward and looking forward. Political Communication, 23, 159–171. doi: 10.1080/10584600600629711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N. (2003). The power of television images: The first Kennedy-Nixon debate revisited. The Journal of Politics, 65(2), 559–571. doi: 10.1111/1468-2508.t01-1-00015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunaway, J. (2008). Markets, ownership, and the quality of campaign news coverage. The Journal of Politics, 70(4), 1193–1202. doi: 10.1017/S0022381608081140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunaway, J., & Stein, R. M. (2013). Early voting and campaign news coverage. Political Communication, 30(2), 278–296. doi: 10.1080/10584609.2012.737420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, E. J. (1973). News from nowhere: Television and the news. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Eshbaugh-Soha, M. (2010). The tone of local presidential news coverage. Political Communication, 27, 121–140. doi: 10.1080/10584600903502623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P., McLeod, D. M., & Nathanson, A. I. (1994). Reporters vs. Undecided voters: An analysis of the questions asked during the 1992 presidential debates. Communication Quarterly, 42, 390–406. doi: 10.1080/01463379409369945
   Google Scholar
• Farnsworth, S. J., & Lichter, S. R. (2011). The nightly news nightmare: Media coverage of U.S. Presidential elections, 1988–2008. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Forgette, R., & Morris, J. S. (2006). High-conflict television news and public opinion. Political Research Quarterly, 59(3), 447–456. doi: 10.1177/106591290605900312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gans, H. J. (1979). Deciding what’s news: A study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2010). What drives media slant? Evidence from U.S. Daily newspapers. Econometrica, 78(1), 35–71. doi: 10.3982/ECTA7195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, J. T. (2004). All the news that’s fit to sell: How the market transforms information into news. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook, T. M. (1999). Political learning from presidential debates. Political Behavior, 21(1), 67–89. doi: 10.1023/A:1023348513570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook, T. M. (2002). Presidential campaigns and the knowledge gap. Political Communication, 19(4), 437–454. doi: 10.1080/10584600290109997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., Norpoth, H., & Hahn, K. S. (2004). Consumer demand for election news: The horserace sells. The Journal of Politics, 66(1), 157–175. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-2508.2004.00146.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson-Beeck, M., & Meadow, R. G. (1979). The triple agenda of presidential debates. Public Opinion Quarterly, 43, 173–180. doi: 10.1086/268509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson, K. H., & Birdsell, D. S. (1988). creating an informed electorate. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Just, M., Crigler, A., & Buhr, T. (1999). Voice, substance, and cynicism in presidential campaign media. Political Communication, 16(1), 25–44. doi: 10.1080/105846099198758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Just, M. R., Crigler, A. N., Alger, D. E., Cook, T. E., Kern, M., & West, D. M. (1996). Crosstalk: Citizens, candidates, and the media in a presidential campaign. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaid, L. L., McKinney, M. S., & Tedesco, J. C. (2000). Civic dialogue in the 1996 presidential campaign: Candidate, media, and public voices. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McKinney, M. S. (2005). Let the people speak: The public’s agenda and presidential town hall debates. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(2), 198–212. doi: 10.1177/0002764205279428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinney, M. S., & Carlin, D. B. (2004). Political campaign debates. In L. L. Kaid (Ed.), Handbook of political communication research (pp. 203–234). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• McKinney, M. S., Rill, L. A., & Thorson, E. (2014). Civic engagement through the presidential debates: Young citizens’ political attitudes in the 2012 election. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(6), 755–775. doi: 10.1177/0002764213515223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinney, M. S., & Warner, B. R. (2013). Do presidential debates matter? Examining a decade of campaign debate effects. Argumentation & Advocacy, 49, 238–258.
   Google Scholar
• McKinnon, M. (2012). Gone rogue: Time to reform the presidential primary debates (Discussion Paper Series #D-67). Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy, pp. 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, J. M., Bybee, C. R., & Durall, J. A. (1979). Equivalence of informed political participation: The 1976 presidential debates as a source of influence. Communication Research, 6(4), 463–487. doi: 10.1177/009365027900600404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadow, R. G., & Jackson-Beeck, M. (1978). A comparative perspective on presidential debates: Issue evolution in 1960 and 1976. In G. F. Bishop, R. G. Meadow, & M. Jackson-Beeck (Eds.), The presidential debates: Media, electoral, and policy perspectives (pp. 33–58). New York, NY: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, A. H., & MacKuen, M. (1979). Informing the electorate: A national study. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp. 269–297). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, T. E. (1980). The mass media election: How Americans choose their president. New York, NY: Praeger Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, T. E. (1994). Out of order. New York, NY: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, T. E. (2003). The vanishing voter: Public involvement in an age of uncertainty. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, T. E. (2013). Informing the news: The need for knowledge-based journalism. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Plasser, F. (2005). From hard to soft news standards? How political journalists in different media systems evaluate the shifting quality of news. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 10(2), 47–68. doi: 10.1177/1081180X05277746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior, M. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increase inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sabato, L. J. (1992). Open season: How the news media cover presidential campaigns in the age of attack journalism. In M. D. McCubbins (Ed.), Under the watchful eye: Managing presidential campaigns in the television era (pp. 128–152). Washington: Congressional Quarterly Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, A. (2000). Media sponsorship of the 2000 primary debates. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 5(4), 104–111. doi: 10.1177/1081180X00005004007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, A. (2008). Presidential debates: Fifty years of high-risk TV. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sparrow, B. H. (2006). A research agenda for an institutional media. Political Communication, 23, 145–157. doi: 10.1080/10584600600629695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stromer-Galley, J., & Bryant, L. (2011). Agenda control in the 2008 CNN/YouTube debates. Communication Quarterly, 59(5), 529–546. doi: 10.1080/01463373.2011.614212
   Google Scholar
• Tuchman, G. (1972). Objectivity as strategic ritual: An examination of newsmen’s notions of objectivity. American Journal of Sociology, 77(4), 660–679. doi: 10.1086/225193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turcotte, J. (2015). The news norms and values of presidential debate agendas: An analysis of format and moderator influence on question content. Mass Communication & Society, 18(3), 239–258. doi: 10.1080/15205436.2014.893362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turcotte, J., & Goidel, R. K. (2014). Political knowledge and exposure to the 2012 US presidential debates: Does debate format matter? PS: Political Science & Politics, 47(2), 449–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentino, N. A., Beckmann, M. N., & Buhr, T. A. (2001). A spiral of cynicism for some: The contingent effects of campaign news frames on participation and confidence in government. Political Communication, 18, 347–367. doi: 10.1080/10584600152647083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, B. A., & Delli Carpini, M. X. (2011). After broadcast news: Media regimes, democracy, and the new information environment. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar