452
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Organizing youth work(ers) through the paradox of play

Pages 197-215 | Received 17 Jul 2017, Accepted 20 Nov 2018, Published online: 19 Mar 2019

References

  • Alcalá, L., Rogoff, B., Mejía-Arauz, R., Coppens, A. D., & Dexter, A. L. (2014). Children’s initiative in contributions to family work in indigenous-heritage and cosmopolitan communities in Mexico. Human Development, 57, 96–115. doi: 10.1159/000356763
  • Allen, B. (1996). Feminist standpoint theory: A black woman’s (re)view of organizational socialization. Communication Studies, 47, 257–271. doi: 10.1080/10510979609368482
  • Ashcraft, K. L., & Trethewey, A. (2004). Developing tension: An agenda for applied research on the organization of irrationality. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32, 171–181. doi:10.1080/0090988042000178103
  • Broadfoot, K. J. (2001). When the cat’s away, do the mice play? Management Communication Quarterly, 15, 110–114. doi: 10.1177/0893318901151006
  • Broadfoot, K. J., & Munshi, D. (2007). Diverse voices and alternative rationalities: Imagining forms of postcolonial organizational communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 21(2), 249–267. doi: 10.1177/0893318907306037
  • Buzzanell, P. (1995). Reframing the glass ceiling as socially constructed process: Implications for understanding and change. Communication Monographs, 62, 327–354. doi: 10.1080/03637759509376366
  • Clair, R. P. (1996). The political nature of the colloquialism “A real job”: implications for organizational socialization. Communication Monographs, 63, 249–267. doi: 10.1080/03637759609376392
  • Clair, R. P. (1999). Ways of seeing: A review of Kramer & Miller’s manuscript. Communication Monographs, 66, 374–381. doi: 10.1080/03637759909376487
  • Demos, J., & Demos, V. (1969). Adolescence in historical perspective. Journal of Marriage & Family, 31, 632–638. doi: 10.2307/349302
  • Dougherty, D., & Smythe, M. J. (2004). Sensemaking, organizational culture, and sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32(4), 293–317. doi: 10.1080/0090988042000275998
  • Fass, P. S., & Mason, M. A. (2000). Childhood in America: Past and present. In P. S. Fass & M. A. Mason (Eds.), Childhood in America (pp. 1–7). New York, NY: New York University Press.
  • Herrygers, K., & Wieland, S. M. B. (2017). Work socialization through part-time work: Cultivating self-efficacy and engagement through care. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 45, 557–575. doi:10.1080/00909882.2017.1382712
  • Jablin, F. M. (2000). Organizational entry, assimilation, and disengagement/exit. In F. M. Jablin, & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication (pp. 732–818). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Johansson, R. (2002). Case study methodology reflected in architectural research. Retrieved from http://www.infra.kth.se/~rolfj/Foufaces2003.pdf
  • Jorgenson, J. (2006). Seeing work-life from children’s standpoints. Electronic Journal of Communication/ La Revue Electronique de Communication, 16, 3–4.
  • Kirby, E. (2000). Should I do as you say or do as you do: Mixed messages about work and family. Electronic Journal of Communication/ La Revue Electronique de Communication, 10, 3–4.
  • Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2011). Qualitative communication research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Lucas, K. (2011). Socializing messages in blue-collar families: Communicative pathways to social mobility and reproduction. Western Journal of Communication, 75, 95–121. doi: 10.1080/10570314.2010.536964
  • Medved, C. E., Brogan, S. M., McClanahan, A. M., Morris, J. F., & Shepherd, G. J. (2006). Family and work socializing communication: Messages, gender, and ideological implications. Journal of Family Communication, 6, 161–180. doi: 10.1207/s15327698jfc0603_1
  • Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Youth. Retrieved from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/youth
  • Mumby, D. K. (2015). Organizing power. Review of Communication, 15(1), 19–38. doi: 10.1080/15358593.2015.1015245
  • Orellana, M. F. (2001). The work kids do: Mexican and central American immigrant children’s contributions to households and schools in California. Harvard Educational Review, 71, 366–390. doi: 10.17763/haer.71.3.52320g7n21922hw4
  • Putnam, L. L., & Ashcraft, K. L. (2017). Gender and organizational paradox. In M. W. Lewis, W. K. Smith, P. Jarzabkowski, & A. Langley (Eds.), Handbook of organizational paradox: Approaches to plurality, tensions and contradictions (pp. 333–352). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Putnam, L. L., Fairhurst, G. T., & Banghart, S. (2016). Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: A constitutive approach. The Academy of Management Annals, 10, 65–171.
  • Putnam, L. L., Myers, K. K., & Gailliard, B. (2014). Examining the tensions in workplace flexibility and exploring options for new directions. Human Relations, 67, 413–440. doi: 10.1177/0018726713495704
  • Ruddin, P. L. (2006). You can generalize stupid! social scientists, Bent Flyvbjerg, and case study methodology. Qualitative Inquiry, 12, 797–812. doi: 10.1177/1077800406288622
  • Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Stohl, C. (1986). The role of memorable messages in the process of organizational socialization. Communication Quarterly, 34, 231–249. doi: 10.1080/01463378609369638
  • Tracy, S. J., Lutgen-Sandvik, P., & Alberts, J. K. (2006). Night-mares, demons and slaves: Exploring the painful metaphors of workplace bullying. Management Communication Quarterly, 20, 148–185. doi:10.1177/1077800410383121
  • Trethewey, A., & Ashcraft, K. L. (2004). Practicing disorganization: The development of applied perspectives on living with tension. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32, 81–88. doi: 10.1080/0090988042000210007
  • Van Maanen, J., & Schein, E. H. (1979). Toward a theory of organizational socialization. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 209–264). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Way, A. (2013). There's no “I” in team: Adolescent emotions as a space for organizing feminine identity. Emotion, Space & Society, 7, 26–34. doi: 10.1016/j.emospa.2012.01.001

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.