‘Eligible to be heard’ in transportation planning

References

• Brenman, M., & Sanchez, T. W. (2012). Planning as if people matter: Governing for social equity. Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, M. (2016). The interruptive voice: Engaging race in public school deliberations. Southern Communication Journal, 81(4), 192–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2016.1200121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbaugh, D. (1989). Talking American: Cultural discourses on DONAHUE. Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Carbaugh, D. (2007). Cultural discourse analysis: Communication practices and intercultural encounters. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 36(3), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475750701737090
   Google Scholar
• Carbaugh, D., & Boromisza-Habashi, D. (2015). Ethnography of communication. In K. Tracy (Ed.), International encyclopedia of language and social interaction (pp. 537–552). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, E. F., Cassar, L., Jones, M., Eiter, S., Izaovičová, Z., Barankova, Z., Christie, M., & Fazey, I. (2011). Rhetoric and reporting of public participation in landscape policy. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 13(1), 23–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2011.560449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, R. (1999). Metadiscourse, theory, and practice. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32(1), 21–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, R. T., & Tracy, K. (2005). “The issue” in argumentation practice and theory. In F. H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (Eds.), The practice of argumentation (pp. 11–28). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, K. N. (2013). Envisioning the role of facilitation in public deliberation. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 41(3), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2013.826813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Highway Administration. (n.d.). Public involvement techniques for transportation decision-making. (Pub. No. FHWA-PD-96-031) Accessed July 5, 2012. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/public_involvement/publications/techniques/chapter02.cfm. Updated (2015). https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/public_involvement/publications/pi_techniques/
   Google Scholar
• Federal Transit Administration. (2011). Transit cooperative research program synthesis 89 public participation strategies for transit: A synthesis of transit practice. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/tcrp/tcrp_syn_89.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (1998). Rationality and power: Democracy in practice (S. Sampson, Trans.). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: Why inquiry fails and how it can succeed again (S. Sampson, Trans.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gastil, J. (1993). Democracy in small groups: Participation, decision making, and communication. New Society.
   Google Scholar
• Gastil, J. (2009). The spirit and practice of deliberative democracy [Original English version of Spirito e prassi della deliberazione]. Deliberativo, 112(March/April), 69–73.
   Google Scholar
• Gastil, J., Deess, P., Weiser, E., & Simmons, C. (2010). The jury and democracy: How jury deliberation promotes civic engagement and political participation. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giering, S. (2011). Public participation strategies for transit: A synthesis of transit practice (Transit Cooperative Research Program Synthesis No. 89). Research sponsored by the Federal Transit Administration in cooperation with the Transit Development Corporation. Transportation Research Board. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/tcrp/tcrp_syn_89.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Guttman, N. (2007). Bringing the mountain to the public: Dilemmas and contradictions in the procedures of public deliberation initiatives that aim to get “ordinary citizens” to deliberate policy issues. Communication Theory, 17(4), 411–438. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00305.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hymes, D. (1972). Models of interaction of language and social life. In J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 35–71). Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Hymes, D. (1996). Ethnography, linguistics, narrative inequality: Toward an understanding of voice. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, I., & Dutta, M. J. (2009). Studying crisis communication from the subaltern studies framework: Grassroots activism in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. Journal of Public Relations Research, 21(2), 142–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627260802557423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leighter, J. L., & Black, L. (2010). “I’m just raising the question”: Terms for talk and practical metadiscursive argument in public meetings. Western Journal of Communication, 74(5), 547–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2010.512281
   Google Scholar
• Leighter, J. L., Black, L. W., Cockett, L. S., & Jarmon, L. (2009). The practice of public meetings: Introduction to the special issue. International Journal of Public Participation, 3(2), 1–13. http://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.84
   Google Scholar
• Leighter, J. L., & Castor, T. (2009). What are we going to “talk about” in this public meeting?: An examination of talk about communication in the North Omaha Development Project. International Journal of Public Participation, 3(2), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.87
   Google Scholar
• Leighter, J. L., Rudnick, L., & Edmonds, T. J. (2013). How the ethnography of communication provides resources for design. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 41(2), 209–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2013.782419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McComas, K. A. (2001). Theory and practice of public meetings. Communication Theory, 11(1), 36–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2001.tb00232.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McComas, K. A. (2003a). Citizen satisfaction with public meetings used for risk communication. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 31(2), 164–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/0090988032000064605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McComas, K. A. (2003b). Public meetings and risk amplification: A longitudinal study. Risk Analysis, 23(6), 1257–1270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2003.00399.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McComas, K. A. (2003c). Trivial pursuits: Participant views of public meetings. Journal of Public Relations Research, 15(2), 91–115. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532754XJPRR1502_1
   Google Scholar
• McComas, K. A., & Scherer, C. W. (1998). Reassessing public meetings as participation in risk management decisions. RISK: Health, Safety and Environment, 9(4), 347–360.
   Google Scholar
• McCormick, S. (2014). Arguments from analogy and beyond: The persuasive artistry of local American civic life. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 100(2), 186–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2014.956787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendelberg, T., & Oleske, J. (2000). Race and public deliberation. Political Communication, 17(2), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/105846000198468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milam, J. M., & Heath, R. G. (2014). Participative democracy and voice: Rethinking community collaboration beyond neutral structures. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 42(4), 366–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2014.911944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reijven, M., & Townsend, R. M. (in press). Communicative competence and local theories of argumentation: The case of academic citational practices. In D. Hample (Ed.), Local theories of argument (pp. 497–503). Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Rudnick, L., & Boromisza-Habashi, D. (2017). The emergence of a local strategies approach to human security. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 12(4), 382–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2017.1365079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartzman, H. B. (1989). The meeting: Gatherings in organizations and communities. Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Scollo, M. (2011). Cultural approaches to discourse analysis: A theoretical and methodological conversation with special focus on Donal Carbaugh’s cultural discourse theory. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 6(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2010.536550
   Google Scholar
• Spoel, P., & Den Hoed, R. (2014). Places and people: Rhetorical constructions of “community” in a Canadian environmental risk assessment. Environmental Communication, 8(3), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2013.850108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprain, L., & Black, L. (2018). Deliberative moments: Understanding deliberation as an interactional accomplishment. Western Journal of Communication, 82(3), 336–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2017.1347275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprain, L., & Boromisza-Habashi, D. (2012). Meetings: A cultural perspective. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 7(2), 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2012.685743
   Google Scholar
• Sprain, L., & Boromisza-Habashi, D. (2013). The ethnographer of communication at the table: Building cultural competence, designing strategic action. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 41(2), 181–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2013.782418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprain, L., & Hughes, M. F. (2015). A new perspective on stories in public deliberation: Analyzing small stories in discussions about immigration. Text & Talk, 35(4), 531–551. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2015-0013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprain, L., & Ivancic, S. (2017). Communicating openness in deliberation. Communication Monographs, 84(2), 241–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2016.1257141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprain, L., & Reinig, L. (2018). Citizens speaking as experts: Expertise discourse in deliberative forums. Environmental Communication, 12(3), 357–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1394894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, R. M. (2006). Widening the circumference of scene: Local politics, local metaphysics. KBJournal, 2(2), n.p. www.kbjournal.org/townsend
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, R. M. (2009). Town meeting as a communication event: Democracy’s act sequence. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 42(1), 68–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351810802671743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, R. M. (2013). Engaging “others” in civic engagement through ethnography of communication. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 41(2), 202–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2013.782420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, R. M. (2014). Mapping routes to our roots: Student civic engagement in transportation planning. In A. Traver & Z. P. Katz (Eds.), Service-learning at the American community college: Theoretical and empirical perspectives (pp. 225–237). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, R. M. (2017). Transporting communication: Community college students facilitate deliberation in their own communities. In T. J. Shaffer, N. V. Longo, I. Manosevitch, & M. S. Thomas (Eds.), Deliberative pedagogy: Teaching and learning for democratic engagement (pp. 169–175). Michigan State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Townsend, R. M. (2019). Speaking for another polis. Iowa Journal of Communication, 51(2), 177–205.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, K. (2007). The discourse of crisis in public meetings: Case study of a school board's multimillion dollar error. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 35, 418–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, K. (2010). Challenges of ordinary democracy: A case study in deliberation and dissent. Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, K. (2011). “Reasonable hostility”: Its usefulness and limitation as a norm for public hearings. Informal Logic, 31(3), 171–190. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v31i3.3399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, K., & Ashcraft, C. (2001). Crafting policies about controversial values: How wording disputes manage a group dilemma. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29(4), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880128115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, K., & Durfy, M. (2007). Speaking out in public: Citizen participation in contentious school board meetings. Discourse & Communication, 1(2), 223–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307076008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, K., & Hughes, J. F. (2014). Democracy-appealing partisanship: A situated ideal of citizenship. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 42(3), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2014.911940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, K., & Muller, H. (2001). Diagnosing a school board’s interactional trouble: Theorizing problem formulating. Communication Theory, 11(1), 84–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2001.tb00234.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, K., & Standerfer, C. (2003). Selecting a school superintendent: Sensitivities in group deliberation. In L. Frey (Ed.), Group communication in context: Studies of bona fide groups (pp. 109–134). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Transportation Research Board. (2009). Public involvement on transit studies: State of the practice. Committee on Public Involvement.
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Transportation. (n.d.). A guide to transportation decisionmaking. Publication No. FHWA-HEP-09-034/HEPP/11-01(15M)P (Archived). http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/publications/transportation_decision_making/decisionmaking.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Villanueva, G., Gonzalez, C., Son, M., Moreno, E., Liu, W., & Ball-Rokeach, S. (2017). Bringing local voices into community revitalization: Engaged communication research in urban planning. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 45(5), 474–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2017.1382711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webler, T., Tuler, S., & Krueger, R. (2001). What is a good public participation process? Five perspectives from the public. Environmental Management, 27(3), 435–450. http://www.seri-us.org/sites/default/files/EnvMgt2001.pdf. Accessed July 6, 2012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webler, T., & van Over, B. (2011). Participants’ perceptions of communication in the North Coast MLPA Process. Project Report. Greenfield MA: Social and Environmental Research Institute. Retrieved July 6, 2012, from http://www.seri-us.org/pubs/MLPA1Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Weeks, J. L. (May–June 2002). Public involvement by minorities and low-income populations: Removing the mystery. TR News no. 220, 25–34. Retrieved July 5, 2012, from ftp://ftp.state.pa.us/public/Bureaus/Cpdm/WEB/Toolbox.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Witteborn, S., & Sprain, L. (2009). Grouping processes in a public meeting from an ethnography of communication and cultural discourse analysis perspective. Journal of Public Deliberation, 5(2), 2. http://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.85
   Google Scholar
• Woolard, K. A., & Schieffelin, B. B. (1994). Language ideology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 23(1), 55–82. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.23.100194.000415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar