1,715
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Publics’ communication on controversial sociopolitical issues: extending the situational theory of problem solving

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 44-65 | Received 27 Jun 2019, Accepted 04 Mar 2020, Published online: 28 Nov 2020

References

  • Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348, 1130–1132. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160
  • Carsey, T., & Laymen, G. (2014, January 14). Our politics is polarized on more issues than ever before. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2014/01/17/our-politics-is-polarized-on-more-issues-than-ever-before/?utm_term=.0b45e2cffd0d
  • Chae, J. (2015). A three-factor cancer-related mental condition model and its relationship with cancer information use, cancer information avoidance, and screening intention. Journal of Health Communication, 20, 1133–1142. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2015.1018633
  • Chae, J. (2016). Who avoids cancer information? Examining a psychological process leading to cancer information avoidance. Journal of Health Communication, 21, 837–844. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2016.1177144
  • Chang, C. T., & Lee, Y. K. (2009). Framing charity advertising: Influences of message framing, image valence, and temporal framing on a charitable appeal 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 2910–2935. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00555.x
  • Chen, H., Beaudoin, C. E., & Hong, T. (2016). Protecting oneself online: The effects of negative privacy experiences on privacy protective behaviors. Journalism & Mass Communication Quaterly, 93, 409–429. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016640224
  • Chen, Y. R. R., Hung-Baesecke, C. J. F., & Kim, J. N. (2017). Identifying active hot-issue communicators and subgroup identifiers: Examining the situational theory of problem solving. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94, 124–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699016629371
  • Colleoni, E., Rozza, A., & Arvidsson, A. (2014). Echo chamber or public sphere? Predicting political orientation and measuring political homophily in Twitter using big data. Journal of Communication, 64, 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12084
  • Dodd, M. D., & Supa, D. (2015). Testing the viability of corporate social advocacy as a predictor of purchase intention. Communication Research Reports, 32, 287–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2015.1089853
  • Eagly, A. J., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
  • Ehrich, K. R., & Irwin, J. R. (2005). Willful ignorance in the request for product attribute information. Journal of Marketing Research, 42, 266–277. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.2005.42.3.266
  • Garrett, R. K. (2009). Echo chambers online? Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 14, 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01440.x
  • Garrett, R. K., Carnahan, D., & Lynch, E. K. (2013). A turn toward avoidance? Selective exposure to online political information, 2004–2008. Political Behavior, 35, 113–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-011-9185-6
  • Golman, R., Hagmann, D., & Loewenstein, G. (2017). Information avoidance. Journal of Economic Literature, 55, 96–135. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20151245
  • Goodall, C. E., & Reed, P. (2013). Threat and efficacy uncertainty in news coverage about bed bugs as unique predictors of information seeking and avoidance: An extension of the EPPM. Health Communication, 28, 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2012.689096
  • Grunig, J. E. (1997). A situational theory of publics: Conceptual history, recent challenges and new research. In D. Moss, T. MacManus, & D. Vercic (Eds.), Public relations research: An international perspective (pp. 3–46). International Thompson Business Press.
  • Howell, J. L., & Shepperd, J. A. (2016). Establishing an information avoidance scale. Psychological Assessment, 28, 1695–1708. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000315
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Ji, Y. G., Chen, Z. F., Tao, W., & Li, Z. C. (2019). Functional and emotional traits of corporate social media message strategies: Behavioral insights from S&P 500 Facebook data. Public Relations Review, 45, 88–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.12.001
  • Jiang, H., Kim, J. N., Liu, B., & Luo, Y. (2019). The impact of perceptual and situational factors on environmental communication: A study of citizen engagement in China. Environmental Communication, 13, 582–602. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1346517
  • Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 692–724. https://doi.org/10.2307/256287
  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–292. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
  • Kang, M., & Park, Y. E. (2017). Exploring trust and distrust as conceptually and empirically distinct constructs: Association with symmetrical communication and public engagement across four pairings of trust and distrust. Journal of Public Relations Research, 29, 114–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2017.1337579
  • Kim, J.-N., & Grunig, J. E. (2011). Problem solving and communicative action: A situational theory of problem solving. Journal of Communication, 61, 120–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01529.x
  • Kim, J.-N., Grunig, J. E., & Ni, L. (2010). Reconceptualizing the communicative action of publics: Acquisition, selection, and transmission of information in problematic situations. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 4, 126–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/15531181003701913
  • Kim, J.-N., Ni, L., Kim, S.-H., & Kim, J. R. (2012). What makes people hot? Applying the situational theory of problem solving to hot-issue publics. Journal of Public Relations Research, 24, 144–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726x.2012.626133
  • Kim, J. K., Overton, H., Bhalla, N., & Li, J. Y. (2019). Nike, Colin Kaepernick, and the politicization of sports: Examining perceived organizational motives and public responses. Public Relations Review, 101856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101856
  • Kim, J.-N., Shen, H., & Morgan, S. E. (2011). Information behaviors and problem chain recognition effect: Applying situational theory of problem solving in organ donation issues. Health Communication, 26, 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2010.544282
  • Kinnick, K. N., Krugman, D. M., & Cameron, G. T. (1996). Compassion fatigue: Communication and burnout toward social problems. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 73, 687–707. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909607300314
  • Kline, L. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford.
  • Krishna, A. (2018). Poison or prevention? Understanding the linkages between vaccine-negative individuals’ knowledge deficiency, motivations, and active communication behaviors. Health Communication, 33, 1088–1096. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1331307
  • Ksiazek, T., Malthouse, E., & Webster, J. (2010). News-seekers and avoiders: Exploring patterns of total news consumption across media and the relationship to civic participation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 54, 551–568. doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2010.519808
  • Lee, H., Oshita, T., Oh, H. J., & Hove, T. (2014). When do people speak out? Integrating the spiral of silence and the situational theory of problem solving. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26, 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2013.864243
  • Liu, B. F., Xu, S., Lim, J. R., & Egnoto, M. (2019). How publics’ active and passive communicative behaviors affect their tornado responses: An integration of STOPS and SMCC. Public Relations Review. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101831
  • Loader, B. D., Vromen, A., & Xenos, M. A. (2014). The networked young citizen: Social media, political participation and civic engagement. Information, Communication & Society, 17, 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2013.871571
  • Matz, J., & Renfrew, D. (2015). Selling ‘fracking’: Energy in depth and the Marcellus shale. Environmental Communication, 9, 288–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.929157
  • Mezaris, V., Nixon, L., Papadopoulos, S., & Teyssou, D. (2019). Video verification in the fake news era. Springer.
  • Mittelstadt, B. (2016). Automation, algorithms, and politics auditing for transparency in content personalization systems. International Journal of Communication, 10, 4991–5002. https://doi.org/1932–8036/20160005
  • Moon, B. B., & Rhee, Y. (2013). Exploring negative dimensions of organization-public relationships (NOPR) in public relations. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 90, 691–714. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699013503161
  • Nah, S., & Yamamoto, M. (2018). The integrated media effect: Rethinking the effect of media use on civic participation in the networked digital media environment. American Behavioral Scientist, 62, 1061–1078. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218764240
  • Ni, L., & Kim, J. N. (2009). Classifying publics: Communication behaviors and problem-solving characteristics in controversial issues. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 3, 217–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/15531180903221261
  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  • Pew Research Center. (2014). Political polarization in the American public. https://www.people-press.org/2014/06/12/political-polarization-in-the-american-public/
  • Quintani, T. L., Silva, M. T. d., & Lapa, T. (2019). Fake news and its impact on trust in the news. Using the Portuguese case to establish lines of differentiation. Communication & Society, 32, 17–33. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.32.3.17-32
  • Rainie, L., Keeter, S., & Perrin, A. (2019). Trust and distrust in America. https://www.people-press.org/2019/07/22/trust-and-distrust-in-america/
  • Rim, H., Lee, Y., & Yoo, S. (2019). Polarized public opinion responding to corporate social advocacy: Social network analysis of boycotters and advocators. Public Relations Review. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101869
  • Rogowski, J. C. (2014). Electoral choice, ideological conflict, and political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 58, 479–494. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12059
  • Sommerfeldt, E. J., & Kent, M. L. (2015). Civil society, networks, and relationship management: Beyond the organization–public dyad. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 9, 235–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118x.2015.1025405
  • Stehr, P., Rössler, P., Leißner, L., & Schönhardt, F. (2015). Parasocial opinion leadership. Media personalities’ influence within parasocial relations: Theoretical conceptualization and preliminary results. International Journal of Communication, 9, 982–1001. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2717/1350
  • Sweeny, K., Melnyk, D., Miller, W., & Shepperd, J. A. (2010). Information avoidance: Who, what, when, and why. Review of General Psychology, 14, 340–353. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021288
  • Tavernise, A., & Gardiner, A. (2019, November 18). ‘No one believes anything’: Voters worn out by a fog of political news. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/18/us/polls-media-fake-news.html?smtyp=cur&smid=fb-nytimes&fbclid=IwAR1PnUVJ9KpEKmhfBmK6gXfL7H7bA1ADDY2bQkXAVg6o8x33ursLId70E44
  • Taylor, M. (2010). Public relations in the enactment of civil society. In R. L. Heath (Ed.), Handbook of public relations II (pp. 5–12). Sage.
  • Tsai, W. H. S., Tao, W., Chuan, C. H., & Hong, C. (2020). Echo chambers and social mediators in public advocacy issue networks. Public Relations Review. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101882
  • Uldam, J., & Askanius, T. (2013). Online civic cultures? Debating climate change activism on YouTube. International Journal of Communication, 7, 1185–1204. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1504/ijeg.2011.041708
  • Webb, T. L., Chang, B. P. I., & Benn, Y. (2013). ‘The Ostrich problem’: Motivated avoidance or rejection of information about goal progress. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 794–807. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12071
  • Werder, K. P., & Holtzhausen, D. (2011). Organizational structures and their relationship with communication management practices: A public relations perspective from the United States. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 5, 118–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2011.561074
  • Yang, Z. J., & Kahlor, L. (2013). What, me worry? The role of affect in information seeking and avoidance. Science Communication, 35, 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012441873
  • Yang, S. U., Kang, M., & Cha, H. (2015). A study on dialogic communication, trust, and distrust: Testing a scale for measuring organization–public dialogic communication (OPDC). Journal of Public Relations Research, 27, 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2015.1007998
  • Yang, A., & Taylor, M. (2013). The relationship between the professionalization of public relations, societal social capital and democracy: Evidence from a cross-national study. Public Relations Review, 39, 257–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.08.002
  • Yuan, Y. C., Fulk, J., & Monge, P. R. (2007). Access to information in connective and communal transactive memory systems. Communication Research, 34, 131–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365020629

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.