661
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

High-reliability organizing and communication during naturalistic decision making: U.S. National Weather Service (NWS) forecasting teams’ use of ‘floating’

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 441-459 | Received 20 Nov 2019, Accepted 18 Oct 2020, Published online: 10 Apr 2021

References

  • Anthony, K. E., & Sellnow, T. L. (2016). The role of the message convergence framework in medical decision making. Journal of Health Communication, 21(2), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2015.1064497
  • Argyris, C. (1986). Reinforcing organizational defensive routines: An unintended human resources activity. Human Resource Management, 25(4), 541–555. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.3930250405
  • Barbour, J. B., & Gill, R. (2017). Questioning as regulatory work practice: The communicative accomplishment of reliability and safety in the oversight of nuclear power plants. Communication Monographs, 84(4), 466–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1322212
  • Bisel, R. S. (2018). Organizational moral learning: A communication approach. Routledge.
  • Bisel, R. S., Barge, J. K., Dougherty, D. S., Lucas, K., & Tracy, S. J. (2014). A round-table discussion of “big” data in qualitative organizational communication research. Management Communication Quarterly, 28(4), 625–649. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318914549952
  • Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509–535). Sage.
  • Coombs, W. T. (2015). Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing, and responding (4th ed.). Sage.
  • Crego, J., & Spinks, T. (1997). Critical incident management simulation. In R. Flin, E. Salas, M. Strub, & L. Martin (Eds.), Decision making under stress: Emerging themes and applications (pp. 85–94). Aldershot Ashgate.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
  • Fernall, R. (1997). Military decision support. In R. Flin, E. Salas, M. Strub, & L. Martin (Eds.), Decision making under stress: Emerging themes and applications (pp. 215–221). Aldershot Ashgate.
  • Ford, J. L. (2018). Revisiting high-reliability organizing: Obstacles to safety and resilience. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 23(2), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-04-2017-0034
  • Gaba, D. M., Fish, K. J., Howard, S. K., & Burden, A. (2014). Crisis management in anesthesiology (2nd ed.). Elsevier.
  • Garner, J. T. (2017). An examination of organizational dissent events and communication channels: Perspectives of a dissenter, supervisors, and coworkers. Communication Reports, 30(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2015.1128454
  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.
  • Gutwin, C., & Greenberg, S. (2004). The importance of awareness for team cognition in distributed collaboration. In E. Salas & S. M. Fiore (Eds.), Team cognition: Understanding the factors that drive process and performance (pp. 177–201). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10690-009
  • Hirokawa, R. Y., & Rost, K. M. (1992). Effective group decision making in organizations: Field test of the vigilant interaction theory. Management Communication Quarterly, 5(3), 267–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318992005003001
  • Ishak, A. W., & Williams, E. A. (2017). Slides in the tray: How fire crews enable members to borrow experiences. Small Group Research, 48(3), 336–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496417697148
  • Jahn, J. L. S., & Black, A. E. (2017). A model of communicative and hierarchical foundations of high reliability organizing in wildland firefighting teams. Management Communication Quarterly, 31(3), 356–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318917691358
  • Keyton, J. (2014). Organizational culture: Creating meaning and influence. In L. L. Putnam & D. K. Mumby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (3rd ed., pp. 549–568). Sage.
  • Kirschenbaum, S. S. (2001). Analyzing submarine decision making: A question of levels. In E. Salas & G. A. Klein (Eds.), Linking expertise and naturalistic decision making (pp. 189–207). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Klein, G. (1997). The current status of the naturalistic decision making framework. In R. Flin, E. Salas, M. Strub, & L. Martin (Eds.), Decision making under stress: Emerging themes and applications (pp. 11–28). Aldershot Ashgate.
  • Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2011). Qualitative communication research methods (3rd ed.). Sage.
  • Littlepage, G. E., & Silbiger, H. (1992). Recognition of expertise in decision-making groups: Effects of group size and participation patterns. Small Group Research, 23(3), 344–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496492233005
  • Martin, L., Flin, R., & Skriver, J. (1997). Emergency decision making – A wider decision framework? In R. Flin, E. Salas, M. Strub, & L. Martin (Eds.), Decision making under stress: Emerging themes and applications (pp. 280–290). Aldershot Ashgate.
  • Militello, L. G. (2001). Representing expertise. In E. Salas & G. A. Klein (Eds.), Linking expertise and naturalistic decision making (pp. 245–261). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Minei, E., & Bisel, R. (2013). Negotiating the meaning of team expertise: A firefighter team’s epistemic denial. Small Group Research, 44(1), 7–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496412467830
  • Riley, W., Davis, S. E., Miller, K. K., & McCullough, M. (2010). A model for developing high-reliability teams. Journal of Nursing Management, 18(5), 556–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01121.x
  • Roeder, A. C., Bisel, R. S., & Morrissey, B. S. (2021). Weathering the financial storm: A professional forecaster team’s domain diffusion of resilience. Communication Studies, 72(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2020.1807379
  • Roeder, A. C., Garner, J. T., & Carr, K. (2020). Workplace relationships, stress, and verbal rumination in organizations. Southern Communication Journal, 85(2), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2019.1697893
  • Salas, E., Rosen, M. A., & DiazGranados, D. (2010). Expertise-based intuition and decision making in organizations. Journal of Management, 36(4), 941–973. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309350084
  • Sutcliffe, K. M. (2011). High reliability organizations (HROs). Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology, 25(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2011.03.001
  • Tracy, S. J. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Wiley.
  • Treem, J. W. (2012). Communicating expertise: Knowledge performances in professional-service firms. Communication Monographs, 79(1), 23–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2011.646487
  • Treem, J. W., & Leonardi, P. M. (2017). Recognizing expertise: Factors promoting congruity between individuals’ perceptions of their own expertise and the perceptions of their coworkers. Communication Research, 44(2), 198–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215605154
  • Ulmer, R. R., Sellnow, T. L., & Seeger, M. W. (2017). Effective crisis communication: Moving from crisis to opportunity (4th ed.). Sage.
  • US Department of Commerce. (n.d.). About the NWS. https://www.weather.gov/about/
  • Weick, K. E. (2001). Tool retention and fatalities in wildland fire settings: Conceptualizing the naturalistic. In E. Salas & G. A. Klein (Eds.), Linking expertise and naturalistic decision making (pp. 321–335). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2001). Managing the unexpected: Assuring high performance in an age of complexity. Jossey-Bass.
  • Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2007). Managing the unexpected: Resilient performance in an age of uncertainty. Jossey-Bass.
  • Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2015). Managing the unexpected: Sustained performance in a complex world. Jossey-Bass.
  • Wilson, K. A., Burke, C. S., Priest, H. A., & Salas, E. (2005). Promoting health care safety through training high reliability teams. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 14(2), 303–309. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2004.010090
  • Zanin, A. C., Bisel, R. S., & Adame, E. A. (2016). Supervisor moral talk contagion and trust-in-supervisor: Mitigating the workplace moral mum effect. Management Communication Quarterly, 30(2), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318915619755

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.