References
- Aladé, F., Lauricella, A., Kumar, Y., & Wartella, E. (2020). Who’s modeling STEM for kids? A character analysis of children’s STEM-focused television in the U.S. Journal of Children and Media, 1–20. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2020.1810087
- Alper, M., Katz, V., & Clark, L. S. (2016). Researching children, intersectionality, and diversity in the digital age. Journal of Children and Media, 10(1), 107–114. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2015.1121886
- Appleton, K. (2003). How do beginning primary school teachers cope with science? Toward an understanding of science teaching practice. Research in Science Education, 33(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023666618800
- Beyens, I., Valkenburg, P. M., & Piotrowski, J. T. (2019). Developmental trajectories of parental mediation across early and middle childhood. Human Communication Research, 45(2), 226–250. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqy016
- Blewitt, P. (1983). Dog versus collie: Vocabulary in speech to young children. Developmental Psychology, 19(4), 602–609. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.19.4.602
- Bonus, J. A. (2019). The impact of pictorial realism in educational science television on U.S. children’s learning and transfer of biological facts. Journal of Children and Media, 13(4), 431–451. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2019.1646295
- Bonus, J. A., & Mares, M. L. (2018). When the sun sings science, are children left in the dark? Distortions of science in children’s television and their effects on children’s learning. Human Communication Research, 44(4), 449–472. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqy009
- Bova, A. (2011). Functions of ‘why’ questions asked by children in family conversations. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 776–782. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.151
- Bova, A., & Arcidiacono, F. (2013). Investigating children's why-questions: A study comparing argumentative and explanatory function. Discourse Studies, 15(6), 713–734. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445613490013
- Braasch, J. L., Goldman, S. R., & Wiley, J. (2013). The influences of text and reader characteristics on learning from refutations in science texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 567–578. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032627
- Callanan, M. A., & Oakes, L. M. (1992). Preschoolers’ questions and parents’ explanations: Causal thinking in everyday activity. Cognitive Development, 7(2), 213–233. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-2014(92)90012-G
- Curran, F. C., & Kellogg, A. T. (2016). Understanding science achievement gaps by race/ethnicity and gender in kindergarten and first grade. Educational Researcher, 45(5), 273–282. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16656611
- Duke, N. K., Bennett-Armistad, V. S., & Roberts, E. M. (2003). Bridging the gap between learning to read and reading to learn. In D. M. Barone & L. M. Morrow (Eds.), Literacy and young children: Research-based practices (pp. 226–242). Guilford Press.
- Durkin, K., Shire, B., Riem, R., Crowther, R. D., & Rutter, D. R. (1986). The social and linguistic context of early number word use. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 4(3), 269–288. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1986.tb01018.x
- Eshach, H., & Fried, M. N. (2005). Should science be taught in early childhood? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(3), 315–336. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-005-7198-9
- Frede, V. (2006). Pre-service elementary teacher's conceptions about astronomy. Advances in Space Research, 38(10), 2237–2246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2006.02.017
- Frøyland, M., Remmen, K. B., & Sorvik, G. O. (2016). Name-dropping or understanding? Teaching to observe geologically. Science Education, 100(5), 923–951. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21232
- Ganea, P. A., Canfield, C. F., Simons-Ghafari, K., & Chou, T. (2014). Do cavies talk? The effect of anthropomorphic picture books on children's knowledge about animals. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00283
- Geerdts, M. S., Van de Walle, G. A., & LoBue, V. (2015). Learning about real animals from anthropomorphic media. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality: Consciousness in Theory, Research, and Clinical Practice, 36(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0276236615611798
- Greenfield, D. B., Jirout, J., Dominguez, X., Greemberg, A., Maier, M., & Fuccillo, J. (2009). Science in the preschool classroom: A programmatic research agenda to improve science readiness. Early Education and Development, 20(2), 238–264. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10409280802595441
- Gustavsson, L., & Pramling, N. (2014). The educational nature of different ways teachers communicate with children about natural phenomena. International Journal of Early Years Education, 22(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2013.809656
- Harris, P. L., & Koening, M. A. (2006). Trust in testimony: How children learn about science and religion. Child Development, 77(3), 505–524. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00886.x
- Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. The Guilford Press.
- Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19312450709336664
- Kallery, M., & Psillos, D. (2004). Anthropomorphism and animism in early years science: Why teachers use them, how they conceptualise them and what are their views on their use. Research in Science Education, 34(3), 291–311. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RISE.0000044613.64634.03
- Keene, J. R., Rasmussen, E. E., Berke, C. K., Densley, R. L., Loof, T., Adams, R. B., Mumma, G. H., & Marshall, A. (2019). The effect of plot explicit, educational explicit, and implicit inference information and coviewing on children’s internal and external cognitive processing. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 47(2), 153–174. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2019.1581367
- Lee, J. (2006). Preschooler teachers’ shared beliefs about appropriate pedagogy for 4-year-olds. Early Childhood Education Journal, 33(6), 433–441. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-006-0059-1
- Morgan, P. L., Farkas, G., Heillemeier, M. M., & Maczuga, S. (2016). Science achievement gaps begin very early, persist, and are largely explained by modifiable factors. Educational Researcher, 45(1), 18–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16633182
- Nathanson, A. (2010). Using television mediation to stimulate nontraditional gender roles among Caucasian and African American children in the US. Journal of Children and Media, 4(2), 174–190. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17482791003629644
- National Science Board. (2018). Science and engineering indicators 2018 (NSB-2018-1). National Science Foundation. https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/indicators/
- Ramasubramanian, S., & Banjo, O. O. (2020). Critical media effects framework: Bridging critical cultural communication and media effects through power, intersectionality, context, and agency. Journal of Communication, 70(3), 379–400. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa014
- Saxe, G. B., Guberman, S. R., Gearhart, M., Gelman, R., Massey, C. M., & Rogoff, B. (1987). Social processes in early number development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 52(2), i–162. https://doi.org/10.2307/1166071
- Shirefly, T. A., Castañeda, C. L., Rodriguez-Gutiérrez, J., Callanan, M. A., & Lipson, J. (2020). Science conversations during family book reading with girls and boys in two cultural communities. Journal of Cognition and Development, 21(4), 551–572. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2020.1797750
- Silander, M., Grindal, T., Hupert, N., Garcia, E., Anderson, K., Vahey, P., & Pasnik, S. (2018). What parents talk about when they talk about learning: A national survey about young children and science. Education Development Center, Inc., & SRI International.
- Stamps, D. (2020). Race and media: A critical essay acknowledging the current state of race-related media effects research and directions for future exploration. Howard Journal of Communications, 31(2), 121–136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10646175.2020.1714513
- Thulin, S., & Pramling, N. (2009). Anthropomorphically speaking: On communication between teachers and children in early childhood biology education. International Journal of Early Years Education, 17(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760902982331
- Tippett, C. D. (2010). Refutation text in science education: A review of two decades of research. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(6), 951–970. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9203-x
- Trumper, R. (2003). The need for change in elementary school teacher training: A cross-college age study of future teachers’ conceptions of astronomy concepts. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(3), 309–323. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(03)00017-9
- Vlach, H. A., & Noll, N. (2016). Talking to children about science is harder than we think: Characteristics and metacognitive judgments of explanations provided to children and adults. Metacognition and Learning, 11(3), 317–338. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-016-9153-y
- Watterson, B. (1995, June 17). Calvin and Hobbes. https://www.gocomics.com/calvinandhobbes/1995/06/17
- Werker, J. F., Pons, F., Dietrich, C., Kajikawa, S., Fais, L., & Amano, S. (2007). Infant-directed speech supports phonetic category learning in English and Japanese. Cognition, 103(1), 147–162. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.03.006