Developing a grounded practical theory of engaged communication scholarship: theorizing communities of practice in NCA journals

References

• Anguiano, C., Milstein, T., De Larkin, I., Chen, Y., & Sandoval, J. (2012). Connecting community voices: Using a Latino/a critical race theory lens on environmental justice advocacy. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 5(2), 124–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2012.661445
   Google Scholar
• Ashcraft, K. L. (2002). Practical ambivalence and troubles in translation. Management Communication Quarterly, 16(1), 113–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318902161009
   Google Scholar
• Ashcraft, K. L. (2017). ‘Submission’ to the rule of excellence: Ordinary affect and precarious resistance in the labor of organization and management studies. Organization, 24(1), 36–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508416668188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin (M. Holquist, Ed.; C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Trans.). University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barbour, J. B., & Gill, R. (2017). Questioning as regulatory work practice: The communicative accomplishment of reliability and safety in the oversight of nuclear power plants. Communication Monographs, 84(4), 466–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1322212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barge, J. K., & Fairhurst, G. T. (2008). Living leadership: A systemic constructionist approach. Leadership, 4(3), 227–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715008092360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barge, J. K., & Shockley-Zalabak, P. (2008). Engaged scholarship and the creation of useful organizational knowledge. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36(3), 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880802172277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broad, G. M., Ball-Rokeach, S. J., Ognyanova, K., Stokes, B., Picasso, T., & Villanueva, G. (2013). Understanding communication ecologies to bridge communication research and community action. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 41(4), 325–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2013.844848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, J., & Gibson, K. (2005). Participatory action research in a poststructuralist vein. Geoforum, 36(3), 315–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carragee, K. M., & Frey, L. R. (2016). Communication activism research: Engaged communication scholarship for social justice. International Journal of Communication, 10, 3975–3999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakravartty, P., Kuo, R., Grubbs, V., & Mcilwain, C. (2018). #Communicationsowhite. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqy003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cheney, G. (2008). Encountering the ethics of engaged scholarship. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36(3), 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880892172293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, M. J. (2015). Partnering for anti-poverty praxis in Circles® USA: Applications of critical dialogic reflexivity. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication, 8(3), 208–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513057.2015.1057905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connaughton, S. L., Linabary, J. R., Krishna, A., Kuang, K., Anaele, A., Vibber, K. S., Yakova, L., & Jones, C. (2017). Explicating the relationally attentive approach to conducting engaged communication scholarship. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 45(5), 517–536. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2017.1382707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conquergood, D. (1985). Performing as a moral act: Ethical dimensions of the ethnography of performance. Literature in Performance, 5(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10462938509391578
   Google Scholar
• Cooren, F. (2018). Materializing communication: Making the case for a relational ontology. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 278–288. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corman, S. R. (2004). Postpositivism. In S. May & D. Mumby (Eds.), Engaging organizational communication theory and research: Multiple perspectives (pp. 15–34). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, R. T. (2006). Communication as practice. In G. J. Shepherd, J. S. John, & T. Striphas (Eds.), Communication as  … : Perspectives on theory (pp. 38–47). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, R. T., & Tracy, K. (1995). Grounded practical theory: The case of intellectual discussion. Communication Theory, 5(3), 248–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1995.tb00108.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, R. T., & Tracy, K. (2014). Building grounded practical theory in applied communication research: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 42(3), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2014.916410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deetz, S. (2008). Engagement as co-generative theorizing. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36(3), 289–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880802172301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deetz, S. A. (1992). Democracy in an age of corporate colonization: Developments in communication and the politics of everyday life. State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dempsey, S., Dutta, M., Frey, L. R., Goodall, H. L., Madison, D. S., Mercieca, J., Nakayama, T., & Miller, K. (2011). What is the role of the communication discipline in social justice, community engagement, and public scholarship? A visit to the CM Café. Communication Monographs, 78(2), 256–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2011.565062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta, M. J. (2020). Whiteness, internationalization, and erasure: Decolonizing futures from the Global South. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 17(2), 228–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2020.1770825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner, J. T., & Barnes, J. (2013). Connecting classrooms and community: Engaged scholarship, nonacademic voices, and organizational communication curriculum. Communication Education, 62(2), 105–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2012.734380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartelius, E. J., & Cherwitz, R. A. (2010). The Dorothy doctrine of engaged scholarship: The rhetorical discipline “had it all along”. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 96(4), 436–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2010.521180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartnett, S. J. (2010). Communication, social justice, and joyful commitment. Western Journal of Communication, 74(1), 68–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570310903463778
   Google Scholar
• Hartwig, R. T. (2014). Ethnographic facilitation as a complementary methodology for conducting applied communication scholarship. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 42(1), 60–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2013.874567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. (2002). Negotiating boundaries between scholars and practitioners: Knowledge, networks, and communities of practice. Management Communication Quarterly, 16(1), 106–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318902161008
   Google Scholar
• Linabary, J. R., Long, Z., Mouton, A., Rao, R. L., & Buzzanell, P. M. (2017). Embracing tensions in feminist organizational communication pedagogies. Communication Education, 66(3), 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2016.1257818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGowan, J. (2010). An immodest proposal. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 96(4), 413–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2010.521177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumby, D. K., & Stohl, C. (1996). Disciplining organizational communication studies. Management Communication Quarterly, 10(1), 50–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318996010001004
   Google Scholar
• NCA call for nominations/applications. (2021). National Communication Association. https://www.natcom.org/sites/default/files/publications/ 2021CallForEditorNominationsJACR_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Norander, S., & Galanes, G. (2014). “Bridging the gap”: Difference, dialogue, and community organizing. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 42(4), 345–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2014.911939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pangborn, S. M. (2017). Reimagining interdisciplinary team communication in hospice care: Disrupting routinization with narrative inspiration. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 45(5), 455–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2017.1382710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PCARE, .. (2017). PCARE @10: Reflecting on a decade of prison communication, activism, research, and education, while looking ahead to new challenges and opportunities. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 14(3), 288–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2017.1345577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, W. B. (1998). On putting social justice in the discipline of communication and putting enriched concepts of communication in social justice research and practice. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 26(2), 272–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909889809365505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, L. L., & Dempsey, S. E. (2015). The five faces of engaged scholarship: Implications for feminist research. Women & Language, 38(1), 11–21.
   Google Scholar
• Ramasubramanian, S., & Sousa, A. N. (2021). Communication scholar-activism: Conceptualizing key dimensions and practices based on interviews with scholar-activists. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 49(5), 477–496. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2021.1964573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Said, E. W. (1978/1995). Orientalism. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, R. E. (1995). A neo-rhetorical perspective: The enactment of role-identities as interactive and strategic. In S. J. Sigman (Ed.), The consequentiality of communication (pp. 67–120). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Seibold, D. R. (2017). A tribute to those associated with this tribute, with great gratitude. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 45(4), 445–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2017.1355593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shockley-Zalabak, P., Barge, J. K., Lewis, L., & Simpson, J. L. (2017). Engaged scholarship. In C. R. Scott & L. Lewis (Eds.), International encyclopedia of organizational communication (pp. 1–15). Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, J. L., & Seibold, D. R. (2008). Practical engagements and co-created research. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36(3), 266–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880802172285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sluss, D. M., & Ashforth, B. E. (2007). Relational identity and identification: Defining ourselves through work relationships. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 9–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.23463672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmerman, E. (2009). Introduction: Has communication research made a difference? Journal of Applied Communication Research, 37(2), 202–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880902792289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmerman, E. (2010). Forum responses: Has communication research made a difference? Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38(3), 293–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2010.490849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. (2020). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact (2nd ed.). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, R. H. (1979). Strategy for developing an integrated role theory. Humboldt Journal of Social Relations, 7(1), 123–139. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23261752
   Google Scholar
• Villanueva, G., Gonzalez, C., Son, M., Moreno, E., Liu, W., & Ball-Rokeach, S. (2017). Bringing local voices into community revitalization: Engaged communication research in urban planning. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 45(5), 474–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2017.1382711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visweswaran, K. (1994). Fictions of feminist ethnography. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zuberi, T., & Bonilla-Silva, E. (Eds.). (2008). White logic, white methods: Racism and methodology. Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar