195
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Decolonizing internationalization initiatives in Brazilian universities

&
Pages 682-701 | Received 14 Feb 2021, Accepted 12 Dec 2022, Published online: 23 Feb 2023

References

  • Altbach, P. G., & Teichler, U. (2001). Internationalization and exchanges in a globalized university. Journal of Studies in International Education, 5(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/102831530151002
  • Archanjo, R. (2017). Moving globally to transform locally? Academic mobility and language policy in Brazil. Language Policy, 16(3), 291–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-016-9408-0
  • Asante, G. (2020). Decolonizing the erotic: Building alliances of (queer) African eros. Women’s Studies in Communication, 43(2), 113–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2020.1745588
  • Ashcraft, K. L., & Trethewey, A. (2004). Special issue synthesis: Developing tension: An agenda for applied research on the organization of irrationality. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32(2), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/14795752.2004.10058565
  • Bardhan, N., & Zhang, B. (2017). A post/decolonial view of race and identity through the narratives of US international students from the global south. Communication Quarterly, 65(3), 285–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2016.1237981
  • Bartell, M. (2003). Internationalization of universities: A university culture-based framework. Higher Education, 45(1), 43–70. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021225514599
  • Buarque, C. (1992). A revolução na esquerda e a invenção do Brasil. Paz e Terra.
  • Cardoso, F. H., & Faletto, E. (1979). Dependency and development in Latin America (Dependencia y desarrollo en América Latina, engl.). University of California Press.
  • Castro-Sotomayor, J. (2020). Territorialidad as environmental communication. Annals of the International Communication Association, 44(1), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2019.1647443
  • Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
  • DaMatta, R.. (1990). Relativizando, uma Introdução à Antropologia Social. Rocco
  • DaMatta, R. (1995). For an anthropology of the Brazilian tradition or ‘A virtude está no meio’. In D. J. Hess, & R. A. DaMatta (Eds.), The Brazilian puzzle: Culture on the borderlands of the western world (pp. 270–291). Columbia University Press.
  • De Lissovoy, N. (2010). Decolonial pedagogy and the ethics of the global. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31(3), 279–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596301003786886
  • Dutta, M. J. (2015). Decolonizing communication for social change: A culture-centered approach. Communication Theory, 25(2), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12067
  • Federal Universidade. (2018). Plano institucional de internacionalização.
  • Fernandes, F. (1965). A Integração do Negro na Sociedade de Classes. Cia Editora Nacional.
  • Fernandes, L. P. (2021). O Ciclo de Internacionalização da UFSC: Consolidando o processo. Florianópolis.
  • Gao, Y. (2015). Toward a set of internationally applicable indicators for measuring university internationalization performance. Journal of Studies in International Education, 19(2), 182–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315314559030
  • Giraldo, I. (2016). Coloniality at work: Decolonial critique and the postfeminist regime. Feminist Theory, 17(2), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700116652835
  • Goldstein, D. (2003). Laughter out of place: Race, class, violence, and sexuality in a Rio shantytown. University of California Press.
  • Grimes, D. S., & Parker, P. S. (2009). Imagining organizational communication as a decolonizing project: In conversation with Broadfoot, Munshi, Mumby, and Stohl. Management Communication Quarterly, 22(3), 502–511. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318908327010
  • Grosfoguel, R. (2007). The epistemic decolonial turn: Beyond political-economy paradigms. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162514
  • Ha, P. L., & Barnawi, O. Z. (2015). Where English, neoliberalism, desire and internationalization are alive and kicking: Higher education in Saudi Arabia today. Language and Education, 29(6), 545–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2015.1059436
  • Hess, D. J. (1995). Introduction. In D. J. Hess, & R. A. DaMatta (Eds.), The Brazilian puzzle: Culture on the borderlands of the western world (pp. 1–30). Columbia University Press.
  • Ishii, K. (2006). Implications of mobility: The uses of personal communication media in everyday life. Journal of Communication, 56(2), 346–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00023.x
  • Jackson, M. H. (2007). Fluidity, promiscuity, and mash-ups: New concepts for the study of mobility and communication. Communication Monographs, 74(3), 408–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750701543543
  • Jaya, P. S. (2001). Do we really ‘know’ and ‘profess’? Decolonizing management knowledge. Organization, 8(2), 227–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508401082008
  • Knight, J. (2004). Internationalization remodeled: Definition, approaches, and rationales. Journal of Studies in International Education, 8(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/10283153.03260832
  • Lauridsen, K. M. (2016). The role of languages in the European higher education area. European Journal of Language Policy, 8(1), 121.
  • Lewis, M. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 760–776. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2000
  • Lillis, T., Hewings, A., Vladimirou, D., & Curry M. J. (2010). The geolinguistics of English as an academic lingua franca: Citation practices across English-medium national and English-medium international journals. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 20(1), 111–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00233.x
  • Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. (2002). Qualitative communication research methods. SAGE.
  • Ludwig, D., Boogaard, B., Macnaghten, P., & Leeuwis, C. (2022). The politics of knowledge in inclusive development and innovation (p. 296). Taylor & Francis.
  • Makoni, S., & Masters, K. A. (2021). Decolonization and globalization in communication studies. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.1152
  • Maldonado-Torres, N. (2011). Thinking through the decolonial turn: Post-continental interventions in theory, philosophy, and critique – An introduction. Transmodernity: Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World, 1(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.5070/T412011805
  • Mease, J. J. (2016). Embracing discursive paradox: Consultants navigating the constitutive tensions of diversity work. Management Communication Quarterly, 30(1), 59–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318915604239
  • Moon, D. G., & Holling, M. A. (2020). ‘White supremacy in heels’: (White) feminism, white supremacy, and discursive violence. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 17(2), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2020.1770819
  • Nakata, M., Nakata, V., Keech, S., & Bolt, R. (2012). Decolonial goals and pedagogies for indigenous studies. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1), 120–140.
  • Pal, M., Kim, H., Harris, K. L., Long, Z., Linabary, J., Wilhoit Larson, E., Jensen, P. R., Gist-Mackey, A. N., McDonald, J., Nieto-Fernandez, B., Jiang, J., Smita Misra, S., & Dempsey, S. E. (2022). Decolonizing organizational communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 36(3), 547–577. https://doi.org/10.1177/08933189221090255
  • Pérez, E. (1999). The decolonial imaginary: Writing chicanas into history. Indiana University Press.
  • Pinheiro, P. S. (2002). The paradox of democracy in Brazil. The Brown Journal of World Affairs, 8(2), 113–122.
  • Putnam, L. L., Fairhurst, G. T., & Banghart, S. (2016). Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: A constitutive approach. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 65–171. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2016.1162421
  • Siaya, L., & Hayward, F. (2003). Mapping internationalization on US campuses. American Council on Education.
  • Stohl, C., & Cheney, G. (2001). Participatory processes/paradoxical practices: Communication and the dilemmas of organizational democracy. Management Communication Quarterly, 14(3), 349–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318901143001
  • Stromquist, N. P. (2007). Internationalization as a response to globalization: Radical shifts in university environments. Higher Education, 53(1), 81–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-005-1975-5
  • Tracy, S. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. John Wiley & Sons.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.