“Masculine” vs. “feminine” strategies in political ADS: Implications for female candidates

References

• Benze , J. G. and Declercq , E. R. 1985 . Content of television political spot ads for female candidates . Journalism Quarterly , 62 : 278 – 283 . 288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoon , M. , Dillard , J. P. and Doran , N. E. 1983 . Friendly or unfriendly persuasion: The effects of violation of expectations by males and females . Human Communication Research , 10 : 283 – 294 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn , D. D. 1981 . Financing presidential campaigns , Washington, DC : Brookings Institution .
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher , M. 1981 . Unequal opportunites: The case of women and the media , Paris : UNESCO .
   Google Scholar
• Garramone , G. M. and Smith , S. J. 1983 . Reactions to political advertising: Clarifying sponsor effects . Journalism Quarterly , 61 : 771 – 775 .
   Google Scholar
• Haas , A. 1979 . Male and female spoken language differences: Stereotypes and evidence . Psychological Bulletin , 86 : 616 – 626 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays , W. 1981 . Statistics, , (3rd ed.) , NY : Holt, Rinehart, & Winston .
   Google Scholar
• Hedlund , R. D. , Freeman , P. K. , Hamm , K. E. and Stein , R. M. 1979 . The electability of women candidates: The effects of sex role sterreotypes . Journal of Politics , 41 : 513 – 524 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Infante , D. A. 1983 . Motivation to speak on a controversial topic: Value expectancy, sex differences and implications . Central States Speech Journal , 34 : 96 – 103 .
   Google Scholar
• Kaid , L. L. 1981 . “ Political advertising ” . In Handbook of political communication , Edited by: Nimmo , D. D. and Sanders , K. R. Beverly Hills : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Kaid , L. L. , Myers , S. L. , Pipps , V. and Hunter , J. 1984 . Sex role perceptions and televised political advertising: Comparing male and female candidates . Women & Politics , 4 : 41 – 53 .
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan , P. W. 1984 . Women upgrade image on TV's network shows . Plain Dealer , December 16 : 15
   Google Scholar
• KirkpatricK , J. J. 1974 . Political women , NY : Basic Books .
   Google Scholar
• Kramarae , C. 1980 . “ Proprietors of language ” . In Women and language in literature and society , Edited by: McConnell‐Ginet , S. , Borker , R. and Furman , N. 58 – 68 . NY : Praeger .
   Google Scholar
• Kramarae , C. 1981 . Women and men speaking , Rowley, MA : Newbury House .
   Google Scholar
• McNeil , J. 1975 . Feminism, femininity and the television series: A content analysis . Journal of Broadcasting , 19 : 259 – 271 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery , B. M. and Norton , R. W. 1981 . Sex differences and similarities in communicator style . Communication Monographs , 48 : 121 – 132 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petronio , S. 1984 . Communication strategies to reduce embarrassment . Western Journal of Speech Communication , 48 : 28 – 38 .
   Google Scholar
• Rapoport , R. B. 1981 . The sex gap in political persuading: Where the “structuring principle”; works . American Journal of Political Science , 25 : 32 – 48 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabato , L. J. 1981 . The rise of the political consultants , New York : Basic Books .
   Google Scholar
• Scott , K. P. 1980 . Perceptions of communication competence: What's good for the goose is not good for the gander . Women's Studies International Quarterly , 3 : 199 – 208 .
   Google Scholar
• Thorne , B. , Kramarae , C. and Henley , n. , eds. 1983 . Language, gender and society , Rowley, MA : Newbury House .
   Google Scholar
• Tolchin , S. and Tolchin , M. 1974 . Clout: Womanpower and politics , NY : Coward, McCann & Geoghegan .
   Google Scholar
• Trent , J. S. and Friedenberg , R. V. 1983 . Political campaign communication: Principles and practices , NY : Oraeger .
   Google Scholar
• Tuchman , G. 1979 . Women's depiction by the mass media . Signs , 4 : 528 – 542 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warfel , K. A. 1984 . Gender schemas and perceptions of speech style . Communication Monographs , 51 : 253 – 267 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar