The Role of Ad Sequence and Privacy Concerns in Personalized Advertising: An Eye-Tracking Study into Synced Advertising Effects

References

• Assael, H. 2011. From silos to synergy. Journal of Advertising Research 51 (1 50th Anniversary Suppl):42–58. doi:10.2501/JAR-51-1-042-058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baek, T. H., and M. Morimoto. 2012. Stay away from me. Journal of Advertising 41 (1):59–76. doi:10.2753/JOA0091-3367410105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batra, R., and K. L. Keller. 2016. Integrating marketing communications: New findings, new lessons, and new ideas. Journal of Marketing 80 (6):122–45. doi:10.1509/jm.15.0419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellman, S., M. Nenycz-Thiel, R. Kennedy, N. Hartnett, and D. Varan. 2019. Best measures of attention to creative tactics in TV advertising. Journal of Advertising Research 59 (3):295–311. doi:10.2501/JAR-2019-002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boerman, S. C., S. Kruikemeier, and F. J. Zuiderveen Borgesius (2017). Online behavioral advertising: A literature review and research agenda. Journal of advertising 46 (3):363–376.
   Google Scholar
• Brasel, S. A., and J. Gips. 2011. Media multitasking behavior: Concurrent television and computer usage. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking 14 (9):527–34. doi:10.1089/cyber.2010.0350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brasel, S. A., and J. Gips. 2017. Media multitasking: How visual cues affect switching behavior. Computers in Human Behavior 77:258–65. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronner, F., and P. Neijens. 2006. Audience experiences of media context and embedded advertising: A comparison of eight media. International Journal of Market Research 48 (1):81–100. doi:10.1177/147078530604800106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Y., and E. Thorson. 2004. Television and web advertising synergies. Journal of Advertising 33 (2):75–84. doi:10.1080/00913367.2004.10639161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutrell, E., and Z. Guan. 2007. An eye-tracking study of information usage in web search: Variations in target position and contextual snippet length. Proc. CHI2007, 407–16.
   Google Scholar
• Dolnicar, S., and Y. Jordaan. 2007. A market-oriented approach to responsibly managing information privacy concerns in direct marketing. Journal of Advertising 36 (2):123–49. doi:10.2753/JOA0091-3367360209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duff, B. R. L., and C. M. Segijn. 2019. Advertising in a media multitasking era: Considerations and future directions. Journal of Advertising 48 (1):27–3. doi:10.1080/00913367.2019.1585306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edell, J. A., and K. L. Keller. 1989. The information processing of coordinated media campaigns. Journal of Marketing Research 26 (2):149–63. doi:10.1177/002224378902600202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• eMarketer. 2018. Mobile advertising is expected to surpass TV ad spending. April. https://www.emarketer.com/content/mobile-advertising-is-expected-to-surpass-tv-ad-spending.
   Google Scholar
• Eysenck, M. W., and M. T. Keane. 2005. Cognitive psychology: A student’s handbook. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friestad, M., and P. Wright. 1994. The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research 21 (1):1–31. doi:10.1086/209380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuentes, L. J., E. Carmona, I. F. Agis, and A. Catena. 1994. The role of the anterior attention system in semantic processing of both foveal and parafoveal words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 6 (1):17–25. doi:10.1162/jocn.1994.6.1.17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garaus, M., U. Wagner, and A.-M. Bäck. 2017. The effect of media multitasking on advertising message effectiveness. Psychology & Marketing 34 (2):138–56. doi:10.1002/mar.20980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrity, P. 2018. How does… a TV synced ad work? https://mumbrella.com.au/tv-synced-ad-work-501593.
   Google Scholar
• Gensler, S., F. Völckner, Y. Liu-Thompkins, and C. Wiertz. 2013. Managing brands in the social media environment. Journal of Interactive Marketing 27 (4):242–56. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2013.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoeck, L., and M. Spann. 2020. An experimental analysis of the effectiveness of multi-screen advertising. Journal of Interactive Marketing 50:81–99. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2020.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janiszewski, C., H. Noel, and A. G. Sawyer. 2003. A meta-analysis of the spacing effect in verbal learning: Implications for research on advertising repetition and consumer memory. Journal of Consumer Research 30 (1):138–49. doi:10.1086/374692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong, S.-H., Y. Hwang, and M. Fishbein. 2010. Effects of exposure to sexual content in the media on adolescent sexual behaviors: The moderating role of multitasking with media. Media Psychology 13 (3):222–42. doi:10.1080/15213269.2010.502872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazakova, S., V. Cauberghe, L. Hudders, and C. Labyt. 2016. The impact of media multitasking on the cognitive and attitudinal responses to television commercials: The moderating role of type of advertising appeal. Journal of Advertising 45 (4):403–16. doi:10.1080/00913367.2016.1183244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. 2004. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, D. M., G. T. Cameron, and C. M. White. 1995. Visual attention to programming and commercials: The use of in-home observations. Journal of Advertising 24 (1):1–12. doi:10.1080/00913367.1995.10673464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, V., and S. Gupta. 2016. Conceptualizing the evolution and future of advertising. Journal of Advertising 45 (3):302–17. doi:10.1080/00913367.2016.1199335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, A., S. Zhou, N. Schwartz, P. D. Bolls, and R. F. Potter. 2000. The effects of edits on arousal, attention, and memory for television messages: When an edit is an edit can an edit be too much? Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 44 (1):94–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. S., and D. Vakratsas. 2019. Dynamic asymmetric effects of cross-media exposures over the purchase cycle. Journal of Advertising Research 59 (4):455–65. doi:10.2501/JAR-2019-001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, J. S., S. Y. Ri, B. D. Egan, and F. A. Biocca. 2015. The cross-platform synergies of digital video advertising: Implications for cross-media campaigns in television, internet and mobile TV. Computers in Human Behavior 48:463–72. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neijens, P. C., and H. A. M. Voorveld. 2015. Cross-platform advertising: Current practices and issues for the future. Journal of Advertising Research 55 (4):362–7. doi:10.2501/JAR-2015-016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen. 2018. Juggling act: Audiences have more media at their disposal and are using them simultaneously. December. https://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/news/2018/juggling-act-audiences-have-more-media-at-their-disposal-and-are-using-them-simultaneously.html.
   Google Scholar
• Pilotta, J. J., and D. Schultz. 2005. Simultaneous media experience and synesthesia. Journal of Advertising Research 45 (1):19–26. doi:10.1017/S0021849905050087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilotta, J. J., D. Schultz, G. Drenik, and P. Rist. 2004. Simultaneous media usage: A critical consumer orientation to media planning. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 3 (3):285–92. doi:10.1002/cb.141
   Google Scholar
• Schacter, D. L. 1996. Illusory memories: A cognitive neuroscience analysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 93 (24):13527–33. doi:10.1073/pnas.93.24.13527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, S., and M. Eisend. 2015. Advertising repetition: A meta-analysis on effective frequency in advertising. Journal of Advertising 44 (4):415–428.
   Google Scholar
• Segijn, C. M. 2019. A new mobile data driven message strategy called synced advertising: Conceptualization, implications, and future directions. Annals of the International Communication Association 43 (1):58–77. doi:10.1080/23808985.2019.1576020
   Google Scholar
• Segijn, C. M., and I. van Ooijen. 2020a. Perceptions of techniques used to personalize messages across media in real time. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking 23 (5):329–37. doi:10.1089/cyber.2019.0682
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segijn, C. M., and I. van Ooijen. 2020b. Differences in consumer knowledge and perceptions of personalized advertising: Comparing online behavioral advertising and synced advertising. Journal of Marketing Communications. Online First doi:10.1080/13527266.2020.1857297.
   Google Scholar
• Segijn, C. M., H. A. M. Voorveld, L. Vandeberg, and E. G. Smit. 2017. The battle of the screens: Unraveling attention allocation and memory effects when multiscreening. Human Communication Research 43 (2):295–314. doi:10.1111/hcre.12106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, S., and H. S. Krishnan. 2001. Memory-based measures for assessing advertising effects: A comparison of explicit and implicit memory effects. Journal of Advertising 30 (3):1–13. doi:10.1080/00913367.2015.1018460
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland, M., and A. K. Sylvester. 2000. Advertising and the mind of the consumer: What works, what doesn't, and why. St. Leonards, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Statista. 2017. Growth of advertising spending worldwide from 2013 to 2019. March. https://www.statista.com/statistics/272443/growth-of-advertising-spending-worldwide/.
   Google Scholar
• Tene, O., and J. Polonetsky. 2014. A theory of creepy: Technology, privacy, and shifting social norms. Yale Journal of Law and Technology 16 (1):59–102.
   Google Scholar
• Voorveld, H. A. M. 2011. Media multitasking and the effectiveness of combining online and radio advertising. Computers in Human Behavior 27 (6): 2200–2206.
   Google Scholar
• Voorveld, H. A. M., P. C. Neijens, and E. G. Smit. 2011. Opening the black box: Understanding cross-media effects. Journal of Marketing Communications 17 (2):69–85. doi:10.1080/13527260903160460
   Google Scholar
• Voorveld, H. A. M., P. C. Neijens, and E. G. Smit. 2012. The interacting role of media sequence and product involvement in cross-media campaigns. Journal of Marketing Communications 18 (3):203–16.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, H., S. Gupta, M. B. Rosson, and J. M. Carroll. 2012. Measuring mobile users’ concerns for information privacy. In Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS) Paper 10, Orlando, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Yun, J. T., C. M. Segijn, S. Pearson, E. C. Malthouse, J. A. Konstan, and V. Shankar. 2020. Challenges and future direction of computational advertising measurement systems. Journal of Advertising 49 (4):446–458.
   Google Scholar
• Zarouali, B., K. Ponnet, M. Walrave, and K. Poels. 2017. Do you like cookies? Adolescents’ skeptical processing of retarget facebook-ads and the moderating role of privacy concern and a textual briefing. Computers in Human Behavior 69:157–65. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar