Patient satisfaction reporting for patellofemoral arthroplasty is significantly lacking: a systematic review

References

• Lombardi AV, Berend KR, Berend ME, et al. Current controversies in partial knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect. 2012;61:347–381.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lonner JH. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: the impact of design on outcomes. Orthop Clin North Am. 2008;39:347–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argenson J-NA, Flecher X, Parratte S, et al. Patellofemoral arthroplasty: an update. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;440:50–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonner JH, Bloomfield MR. The clinical outcome of patellofemoral arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 2013;44:271–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies AP, Vince AS, Shepstone L, et al. The radiologic prevalence of patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002; (402):206–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAlindon TE, Snow S, Cooper C, et al. Radiographic patterns of osteoarthritis of the knee joint in the community: the importance of the patellofemoral joint. Ann Rheum Dis. 1992;51:844–849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:264–9, W64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, et al. Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg. 2003;73:712–716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starks I, Roberts S, White SH. The Avon patellofemoral joint replacement: independent assessment of early functional outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:1579–1582.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goh GS-H, Liow MHL, Tay DK-J, et al. Four-year follow up outcome study of patellofemoral arthroplasty at a single institution. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30:959–963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogervorst P, de Jong RJ, Hannink G, et al. A 21% conversion rate to total knee arthroplasty of a first-generation patellofemoral prosthesis at a mean follow-up of 9.7 years. Int Orthop. 2015;39:1857–1864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazarian GS, Tarity TD, Hansen EN, et al. Significant functional improvement at 2 years after isolated patellofemoral arthroplasty with an onlay trochlear implant, but low mental health scores predispose to dissatisfaction. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31:389–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willekens P, Victor J, Verbruggen D, et al. Outcome of patellofemoral arthroplasty, determinants for success. Acta Orthop Belg. 2015;81:759–767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konan S, Haddad FS. Midterm outcome of Avon patellofemoral arthroplasty for posttraumatic unicompartmental osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31:2657–2659.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halai M, Ker A, Anthony I, et al. Femoro patella vialla patellofemoral arthroplasty: an independent assessment of outcomes at minimum 2-year follow-up. World J Orthop. 2016;7:487–493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scuderi GR, Bourne RB, Noble PC, et al. The new knee society knee scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:3–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strickland SM, Bird ML, Christ AB. Advances in patellofemoral arthroplasty. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2018;11:221–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrone FL, Baron S, Suero EM, et al.Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients undergoing patellofemoral arthroplasty and total knee replacement: a comparative study. Technol Heal Care 2018;26:507–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odgaard A, Madsen F, Kristensen PW, et al. The mark coventry award. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018;476:87–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shubin Stein BE, Brady JM, Grawe B, et al. Return to activities after patellofemoral arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2017;46:E353–E357.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Collins NJ, Misra D, Felson DT, et al. Measures of knee function: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee evaluation form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADL), Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Activity Rating Scale (ARS), and Tegner Activity Score (TAS). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011;63:S208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, et al. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80:63–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roos EM, Lohmander LS. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kujala UM, Jaakkola LH, Koskinen SK, et al. Scoring of patellofemoral disorders. Arthroscopy. 1993;9:159–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lützner C, Postler A, Beyer F, et al. Fulfillment of expectations influence patient satisfaction 5 years after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surgery, Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, et al. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:57–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahlenberg CA, Nwachukwu BU, McLawhorn AS, et al.Patient satisfaction after total knee replacement: a systematic review. HSS J ® 2018;14:192–201.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kahlenberg CA, Nwachukwu BU, Schairer WW, et al. Patient satisfaction reporting after total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. Orthopedics. 2017;40:e400–e404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thambiah M, Nathan S, Seow B, et al. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: an Asian perspective. Singapore Med J. 2015;56:259–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunbar MJ, Richardson G, Robertsson O. I can’t get no satisfaction after my total knee replacement: rhymes and reasons. Bone Joint J. 2013;95–B:148–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau RL, Gandhi R, Mahomed S, et al. Patient satisfaction after total knee and hip arthroplasty. Clin Geriatr Med. 2012;28:349–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs CA, Christensen CP. Factors influencing patient satisfaction two to five years after primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29:1189–1191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anakwe RE, Jenkins PJ, Moran M. Predicting dissatisfaction after total hip arthroplasty: a study of 850 patients. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:209–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolfson O, Kärrholm J, Dahlberg LE, et al. Patient-reported outcomes in the Swedish hip arthroplasty register. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93–B:867–875.
   Google Scholar
• Mancuso CA, Salvati EA, Johanson NA, et al. Patients’ expectations and satisfaction with total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:387–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourne RB, Chesworth B, Davis A, et al. Comparing patient outcomes after THA and TKA: is there a difference? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:542–546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knies S, Evers SMAA, Candel MJJM, et al. Utilities of the EQ-5D: transferable or not? Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27:767–779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson JA, Luo N, Shaw JW, et al. Valuations of EQ-5D health states: are the United States and United Kingdom different? Med Care. 2005;43:221–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar