Erasing Bisexual Identity: The Visibility and Invisibility of Bisexuality as a Sexual Identity in the Dutch Homosexual Movement, 1946-1972

References

• A.d. (1963). Sirenes. Vriendschap, 18(9), 187.
   Google Scholar
• Alberts, J. C. (1949). Wij zijn normaal [We are normal]. Vriendschap, 4(8–9), 27.
   Google Scholar
• Alberts, J. C. P. (1952). Opmerkingen van Joh. C. P. Alberts over Gide [Remarks of Joh. C.P. Alberts about Gide]. Vriendschap, 7(3), 5.
   Google Scholar
• Angelides, S. (2001). A history of bisexuality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Angelides, S. (2006). Historicizing (bi)sexuality: A rejoinder for gay/lesbian studies, feminism, and queer theory. Journal of Homosexuality, 52(1–2), 125–158. doi:10.1300/J082v52n01_06
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelo, B. [Niek Engelschman]. (1951). Rede van Bob Angelo op het internationale congress [Speech of Bob Angelo at the International Congress]. Vriendschap, 6(6), 5–7.
   Google Scholar
• Burgers, C., & Franssen, J. (1992). Tussen verlangen en belangen. De Nederlandse homo- en lesbische beweging [Between desire and interests: The Dutch gay and lesbian movement]. In J. W. Duyvendak (Ed.), Tussen verbeelding en macht. 25 jaar nieuwe sociale bewegingen in Nederland (pp. 186–191). Amsterdam, Netherlands: SUA.
   Google Scholar
• Callis, A. S. (2009). Playing with butler and Foucault: Bisexuality and queer theory. Journal of Bisexuality, 9, 213–233. doi:10.1080/15299710903316513
   Google Scholar
• COC, Open Brief aan zijne Excellentie de Minister van Justitie. (1969, January 25). [Open letter of the Dutch Homophile Society COC to the Minister of Justice]; 142 Archive ‘Nederlandse Vereniging Seksuele Hervorming’. Amsterdam, Netherlands: International Institute of Social History (IISH)
   Google Scholar
• Costera Meijer, I. (1996). Het persoonlijke wordt politiek. Feministische bewustwording in Nederland 1965–1980. [The personal becomes political: Feminist awakening in the Netherlands 1965–1980]. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Spinhuis.
   Google Scholar
• Du Plessis, M. (1996). Blatantly bisexual; or unthinking queer theory. In D. Hall & M. Pramaggiore (Eds.), RePresenting bisexualities: Subjects and cultures of fluid desire (pp. 19–54). New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duyvendak, J. W. (Ed.). (1995). De verzuiling van de homobeweging [The pillarization of the homosexual movement]. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Sua.
   Google Scholar
• Duyvendak, J. W., & Hekma, G. (2011). The Netherlands: Depoliticization of homosexuality and homosexualization of politics. In M. Tremblay, D. Paternotte, & C. Johnson (Eds.), The lesbian and gay movement and the state: Comparative insights into a transformed relationship (pp. 103–118). Surrey, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• FSWH. (1969). Najaarscongres [Congress Autumn]. Proefding, 1(2), 2. 3 Archive FSWH, IISH.
   Google Scholar
• Germon, J. E. (2008). Kinsey and the politics of bisexual authenticity. Journal of Bisexuality, 8, 243–258. doi:10.1080/15299710802501652
   Google Scholar
• Gooß, U. (2008). Concepts of bisexuality. Journal of Bisexuality, 8, 9–23. doi:10.1080/15299710802142127
   Google Scholar
• Heemster, E. (1954). Bisexualiteit en decadentie. [Bisexuality and decadence]. Vriendschap, 9(2), 22.
   Google Scholar
• Hoofdbestuur. (1968). Contakt gezocht, [Searching contacts]. Schakelkrant, 2(7), 8–9.
   Google Scholar
• Lover, F. (1951). De negers, de mulatten en wij. [The negroes, the mulattos, and we]. Vriendschap, 6(5), 3–4.
   Google Scholar
• MacDowell, L. (2009). Historicising contemporary bisexuality. Journal of Bisexuality, 9, 3–15. doi:10.1080/15299710802659989
   Google Scholar
• McLean, K. (2004). Negotiating (non)monogamy. Journal of Bisexuality, 4, 83–97. doi:10.1300/J159v04n01_07
   Google Scholar
• Nationale Federatie voor de Geestelijke Volksgezondheid, Brief aan de leden van de commissie geestelijke gezondheidszorg en homofilie, [National Federation of Mental Health, Letter to Members of the Committee of Mental Health Care and Homosexuality]. (1968, August 23). 142 Archive ‘Nederlandse Vereniging Seksuele Hervorming’. ISSH.
   Google Scholar
• Nederlandse Vereniging Seksuele Hervorming, Notulen Dagelijks bestuur, [Dutch Society of Sexual Reform, Minutes of the Daily Board]. (1969, maart 5). 142 Archive ‘Nederlandse Vereniging Seksuele Hervorming’. IISH.
   Google Scholar
• Nieboer, S. (1957). Overpeinzingen van een nieuw redactielid [Thoughts of a new editor]. Vriendschap, 12(6), 93–94.
   Google Scholar
• Nogmaals het COC [The COC Again]. (1969). Informatiebulletin Dialoog, 2, 100–120.
   Google Scholar
• Onstenk, A. (1983). Van brede schouders tot hoge hakken: Veranderde beeldvorming over lesbische vrouwen in de periode 1939–1965, [Big shoulders and high heels: The changing image of lesbian women in 1939–1965]. Amsterdam Netherlands: Sua.
   Google Scholar
• Oosterhuis, H. (1992). Homoseksualiteit in katholiek Nederland. Sociale geschiedenis 1900–1970 [Homosexuality in Catholic Netherlands: Social history 1900–1970]. Amsterdam Netherlands: Spinhuis.
   Google Scholar
• Oosterhuis, H., & Lipperts, A. (2013). Falling between two stools: The difficult emancipation of bisexuality in the Netherlands. Journal of Bisexuality, 13, 245–272. doi:10.1080/15299716.2013.782259
   Google Scholar
• Orpheus, S. (n.d.). Wat is en doet “orpheus?” [Pamphlet What is “Orpheus” and what does it do] Archive Orpheus, box I, folder 2. IISH.
   Google Scholar
• Premsela, B. (1968). Actief en zo nodig agressief, [Active and if needed aggressive]. Schakelkrant. Maandblad van de Nederlandse Vereniging voor Homofielen COC, 2(1), 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Redactie Sirene. (1963). Reactie op ingezonden brief “Ik vind ’t smerig.” [Response to the letter “I think it is filthy”]. Vriendschap, 18(4), 91.
   Google Scholar
• Rogge, H. (1949a). Boekbespreking [Book review]. Vriendschap, 4(11), 14–15.
   Google Scholar
• Rogge, H. (1949b). Homophilie [Homosexuality]. Vriendschap, 4(12), 5–7.
   Google Scholar
• Rogge, H. (1950). De psychische constellatie en de stoornissen daarin [The psychic constellation and the distortions]. Vriendschap, 5(4), 4–5.
   Google Scholar
• Rogge, H. (1953a). Antwoord op Dr. F. J. Tolsma’s “Homosexualiteit & Homoerotiek” [A response to Dr. F. J. Tolsma’s homosexuality & homoerotics]. Vriendschap, 8(5), 7–9.
   Google Scholar
• Rogge, H. (1953b). Antwoord op Dr. F. J. Tolsma’s “Homosexualiteit & Homoerotiek” II [A response to Dr. F. J. Tolsma’s homosexuality & homoerotics II]. Vriendschap, 8(6), 7–8.
   Google Scholar
• Ramien, T. [Magnus Hirschfeld]. (1896). Sappho und Sokrates oder Wie erklärt sich die Liebe der Männer und Frauen zu Personen des eigenen Geschlechts? Leipzig, Germany: Verlag von Max Spohr.
   Google Scholar
• Rupp, L. J. (2011). The persistence of transnational organizing: The case of the homophile movement. American Historical Review, 116, 1014–1039. doi:10.1086/ahr.116.4.1014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rust, P. C. (1995). Bisexuality and the challenge to lesbian politics. Sex, loyalty and revolution. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rust, P. C. (2000). Bisexuality in the United States: A social science reader. New York, NY: Colombia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schuyf, J., & Krouwel, A. (1999). Dutch gay and lesbian movements: The politics of accommodation. In B. D. Adams, J. W. Duyvendak, & A. Krouwel (Eds.), The global emergence of gay and lesbian politics, national imprints of a worldwide movement (pp. 158–183). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Servatius. (1961). Phenomenologische beschouwingen over bisexualiteit. [Phenomenological reflections on bisexuality]. COC Periodiek, 4(3), 20–22. Appeared before in Vriendschap, 16(1), 9.
   Google Scholar
• Spaan, R. [Rob Gras]. (1965). De homofiele vrouw [The homophile woman]. Dialoog, 1(3), 83–96.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. C. (1996 [1985]). Subaltern studies. Deconstructing historiography. In D. Landry & G. Maclean (Eds.), The Spivak reader. Selected works Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Swiebel, J. (1969). Studenten moeten koplopers zijn in de seksuele revolutie [Students need to be the leaders of the sexual revolution]. Seq, 1(1), 29–31.
   Google Scholar
• Tamboer, K. (1972). Justitiedossier. Zwartboek over de houding van de Nederlandse overheid tegenover homoseksualiteit en het COC [The black book of the governmental treatment of homosexuality in the Netherlands]. (Dialoogreeks 1). Amsterdam: Stichting Dialoog.
   Google Scholar
• Tielman, R. (1982). Homoseksualiteit in Nederland [Homosexuality in the Netherlands]. Amsterdam Netherlands: Boom.
   Google Scholar
• Udis Kessler, A. (1996). Identity/politics: Historical sources of the bisexual movement. In B. Beemyn & M. Eliason (Eds.), Queer studies: A lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender anthology (pp. 52–63). New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Alphen, M. (1953). Nieuwe boeken die ons interesseren. [New books that interest us]. Vriendschap, 8(3), 15–16.
   Google Scholar
• Van Mechelen, F. [Henri Methorst]. (1952). Een groots en tragisch misverstand. Nogmaals rond Andre Gides. [A big and tragic misunderstanding of Andre Gides again]. Vriendschap, 7(3), 5–6.
   Google Scholar
• Van Mechelen, F. [Henri Methorst]. (1953). Bisexualiteit [Bisexuality]. Vriendschap, 8(12), 7–9.
   Google Scholar
• Van Santhorst, A. (1950). Leven en werk van Johan C.P. Alberts [Life and work of Johan C. P. Alberts]. Vriendschap, 5(9), 5–7.
   Google Scholar
• Van Weerlee, D. (1967). Onttakeling in het Gooi [Deconstruction in the Gooi]. Dialoog, 3(4), 146–147.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshino, K. (2000). The epistemic contract of bisexual erasure. Stanford Law Review, 52, 353–461. doi:10.2307/1229482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwiep, D. (1971). Twee dominees. Ook wij zijn homofiel. [Two reverends: We too are homophile]. Rechts Richten, 1(1), 16–18.
   Google Scholar
• Zwiep, D. (1972a). Jef Last. Rechts Richten, 1(2), 18–21.
   Google Scholar
• Zwiep, D. (1972b). High. Rechts Richten, 1, 21–22.
   Google Scholar