The Nashville Statement’s Undoing? Grappling with Evangelical Christianity’s Ontology of Sex

References

• Barry, M. (2017, August 8). The @CBMWorg’s so-called “Nashville Statement” is poorly named and does not represent the inclusive values of the city & people of Nashville [Tweet]. Retrieved from @mayormeganbarry website: https://twitter.com/mayormeganbarry/status/902557781336711170
   Google Scholar
• Blithe, S. J., & Hanchey, J. N. (2015). The discursive emergence of gendered physiological discrimination in sex verification testing. Women’s Studies in Communication, 38(4), 486–506. doi:10.1080/07491409.2015.1085474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, E. T. (2011). Queering Queer Eye: The stability of gay identity confronts the liminality of trans embodiment. Western Journal of Communication, 75(2), 185–204. doi:10.1080/10570314.2011.553876
   Google Scholar
• Burke, K. (1966). Language as symbolic action: Essays on life, literature, and method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Capuzza, J. C. (2015). What’s in a name? Transgender identity, metareporting, and the misgendering of Chelsea Manning. In L. G. Spencer & J. C. Capuzza (Eds.), Transgender communication studies: Histories, trends, and trajectories (pp. 93–110). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Chávez, K. R. (2004). Beyond complicity: Coherence, queer theory, and the rhetoric of the “gay Christian movement.” Text & Performance Quarterly, 24(3–4), 255–275. doi:10.1080/1046293042000312760
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, P. S. (2011). Radical love: An introduction to queer theology. New York, NY: Seabury Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, P. S. (2015). Contributions from queer theory. In A. Thatcher (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of theology, sexuality, and gender (pp. 153–169). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coalition for Biblical Sexuality. (2017). Nashville statement. Retrieved from CBMW website: https://cbmw.org/nashville-statement/
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall, S. (2010). Sex and uncertainty in the body of Christ: Intersex conditions and Christian theology. London, UK: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall, S. (2014). Telling stories about intersex and Christianity: Saying too much or not saying enough? Theology, 117(1), 24–33. doi:10.1177/0040571X13510228
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall, S. (2015a). Intersex and transgender people. In A. Thatcher (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of theology, sexuality, and gender (pp. 657–675). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall, S. (2015b). Introduction: Troubling bodies? In S. Cornwall (Ed.), Intersex, theology, and the Bible: Troubling bodies in church, text, and society (pp. 1–26). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, R. P. (2018). Infiltrative rhetoric for LGB inclusion: The LDS version of the “Supportive Families, Healthy Children” pamphlet. Western Journal of Communication, 82(3), 259–275. doi:10.1080/10570314.2017.1390147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz, E. (2017, September 1). The Nashville Statement is an attack on L.G.B.T. Christians. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/01/opinion/nashville-statement-lgbt-christians.html
   Google Scholar
• DeFranza, M. K. (2015a). Sex difference in Christian theology: Male, female, and intersex in the image of God. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• DeFranza, M. K. (2015b). Virtuous eunuchs: Troubling conservative and queer readings of intersex and the Bible. In S. Cornwall (Ed.), Intersex, theology, and the Bible: Troubling bodies in church, text, and society (pp. 55–77). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Doty, A. (1993). Making things perfectly queer: Interpreting mass culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dow, B. J. (1996). Prime-time feminism: Television, media culture, and the women’s movement since 1970. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dow, B. J. (2001). Ellen, television, and the politics of gay and lesbian visibility. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 18(2), 123–140. doi:10.1080/07393180128077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreher, R. (2017, September 6). Is The Nashville Statement a surrender? Retrieved from The American Conservative website: http://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/is-the-nashville-statement-a-surrender/
   Google Scholar
• Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, S. (1999). Intersexuality and scripture. Theology & Sexuality, 11, 65–74. doi:10.1177/135583589900601105
   Google Scholar
• Harris, T. M., & Steiner, R. J. (2018). Beyond the veil: A critique of White Christian rhetoric and racism in the age of Trump. Journal of Communication & Religion, 41(1), 33–45.
   Google Scholar
• Hester, J. D. (2005). Eunuchs and the postgender Jesus: Matthew 19.12 and transgressive sexualities. Journal for the Study of the New Testament, 28(1), 13–40. doi:10.1177/0142064X05057772
   Google Scholar
• House, C. A., & Johnson, A. E. (2018). Introduction: Communication, religion, and race in America: 50 years later and where do we go from here? Journal of Communication & Religion, 41(1), 5–7.
   Google Scholar
• Jasinski, J. (2001). Sourcebook on rhetoric: Key concepts in contemporary rhetorical studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, A., & Lewis, M. M. (2018). Transcending the acronym, traversing gender: A conversation in the margins of the margins. Women & Language, 41(1), 128–145.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, P. B. (2015). Intersex on earth as it is in heaven. In S. Cornwall (Ed.), Intersex, theology, and the Bible: Troubling bodies in church, text, and society (pp. 173–195). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Latham, J. R., & Barrett, C. (2015). Appropriate bodies and other damn lies: Intersex ageing and aged care. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 34, 19–20. doi:10.1111/ajag.12275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, E. C. (2018). Becoming a transgender failure: Speciation, benevolent transphobia, and the persistence of binary gender. Women & Language, 41(1), 39–61.
   Google Scholar
• Marchal, J. A. (2015). Who are you calling a eunuch?! Staging conversations and connections between feminist and queer biblical studies and intersex advocacy. In S. Cornwall (Ed.), Intersex, theology, and the Bible: Troubling bodies in church, text, and society (pp. 26–54). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Messer, N. (2015). Contributions from biology. In A. Thatcher (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of theology, sexuality, and gender (pp. 69–87). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, H. (2017, August 29). Evangelical leaders issue Nashville Statement, a “Christian manifesto” on human sexuality. The Tennessean. Retrieved from https://www.tennessean.com/story/news/2017/08/29/evangelical-leaders-issue-nashville-statement-christian-manifesto-human-sexuality-lgbt-gay-marriage/611756001/
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. H. (2017). “Until death do we (Queers) part”: (Queer) biblical interpretation, (Invented) truth, and presumption in controversies concerning biblical characters’ sexualities. QED: A Journal in GLBTQ Worldmaking, 4(1), 42–67. doi:10.14321/qed.4.1.0042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollenkott, V. R. (2001). Omnigender: A trans-religious approach. Cleveland, OH: Pilgrim Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morland, I. (2005). ‘The glans opens like a book’: Writing and reading the intersexed body. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 19(3), 335–348. doi:10.1080/103043110500176586
   Google Scholar
• Morland, I. (2012). The injured world: Intersex and the phenomenology of feeling. Differences, 23(2), 20–41. doi:10.1215/10407391-1629803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morland, I. (2014). Intersex. TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly, 1(1–2), 111–115. doi:10.1215/23289252-2399758
   Google Scholar
• Mosurinjohn, S. (2014). Popular journalism, religious morality, and the Canadian imaginary: Queer and immigrants as threats to the public sphere. The Journal of Religion and Popular Culture, 26(2), 244–258. doi:10.3138/jrpc.26.2.244
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, G., & Spencer, L. G. (2017). What’s so funny about a snowman in a tiara? Exploring gender identity and gender nonconformity in children’s animated films. Queer Studies in Media & Popular Culture, 2(1), 73–93. doi:10.1386/qsmpc.2.1.73_1
   Google Scholar
• Petermon, J. D., & Spencer, L. G. (2019). Black queer womanhood matters: Searching for the queer herstory of black lives matter in television dramas. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 36, 1–18. doi:10.1080/15295036.2019.1607518
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slagle, R. A. (2003). Queer criticism and sexual normativity: The case of Pee-wee Herman. Journal of Homosexuality, 45(2–4), 129–146. doi:10.1300/J082v45n02_06
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloop, J. M. (2012). “This is not natural”: Caster Semenya’s gender threats. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 29(2), 81–96. doi:10.1080/15295036.2012.670876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, L. G. (2014). Performing transgender identity in The Little Mermaid: From Andersen to Disney. Communication Studies, 65(1), 112–127. doi:10.1080/10510974.2013.832691
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, L. G. (2015). Coming out, bringing out: God’s love, transgender identity, and difference. In L. G. Spencer & J. C. Capuzza (Eds.), Transgender communication studies: Histories, trends, and trajectories (pp. 187–198). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, L. G. (2016). Intersex: Considerations for language and invitations to further research. Women & Language, 39(1), 19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, L. G. (2018). Special issue editor’s introduction: Transcending the acronym. Women & Language, 41(1), 7–15.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, L. G. (2019). Mobilizing conversion narratives toward (non)religious civility: The case of Chris Stedman’s. Faitheist. Journal of Communication & Religion, 42(1), 20–32.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, L. G., & Barnett, J. T. (2013). Touring homophobia: Understanding the soulforce equality ride as a toxic tour. Southern Communication Journal, 78, 25–41. doi:10.1080/1041794X.2012.717683
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, L. G., & Barnett, J. T. (2016). Rhetorics of incommensurability: Disarticulating queer Christianity in mainstream news coverage of the soulforce equality ride. Queer Studies in Media & Popular Culture, 1(2), 141–158. doi:10.1386/qsmpc1.2.141_1
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, L. G., & Patterson, G. (2017). Abridging the acronym: Neoliberalism and the proliferation of identitarian politics. Journal of LGBT Youth, 14(3), 296–316. doi:10.1080/19361653.2017.1324343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterk, H. M. (2010). Faith, feminism and scholarship: The Journal of Communication and Religion, 1999–2009. Journal of Communication & Religion, 33, 206–216.
   Google Scholar
• Zarefsky, D. (2004). Presidential rhetoric and the power of definition. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 34(3), 607–619. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5705.2004.00214.x
   Google Scholar
• Zeiler, K., & Wickstrom, A. (2009). Why do “we” perform surgery on newborn intersexed children?: The phenomenology of the parental experience of having a child with intersex anatomies. Feminist Theory, 10(3), 359–377. doi:10.1177/1464700109343258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar