“A Space Where Queer Is Normalized”: The Online World and Fanfictions as Heterotopias for WLW

References

• Anselmo, D. W. (2018). Gender and queer fan labor on Tumblr: The case of BBC’s Sherlock. Feminist Media Histories, 4(1), 84–114. doi:10.1525/fmh.2018.4.1.84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacon-Smith, C. (1992). Enterprising women: Television fandom and the creation of popular myth. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baltar, F., & Brunet, I. (2012). Social research 2.0: Virtual snowball sampling method using Facebook. Internet Research, 22(1), 57–74. doi:10.1108/10662241211199960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, D. (1997). Sex lives and audiotape: Geography, sexuality and undergraduate dissertations. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 21(3), 411–417. doi:10.1080/03098269708725446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, R. (2010). Out & about: Slash fic, re-imagined texts, and queer commentaries. In C. Pullen & M. Cooper (Eds.), LGBT identity and online new media (pp. 173–184). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, D. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. New Haven; London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. (2006). Regulating aversion: Tolerance in the age of identity and empire. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, K. (2005). Snowball sampling: Using social networks to research non‐heterosexual women. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 47–60. doi:10.1080/1364557032000081663
   Google Scholar
• Bury, R. (2005). Cyberspaces of their own: Female fandoms online. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Byron, P., Albury, K., & Evers, C. (2013). “It would be weird to have that on Facebook”: Young people’s use of social media and the risk of sharing sexual health information. Reproductive Health Matters, 21(41), 35–44. doi:10.1016/S0968-8080(13)41686-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carabine, J. (2001). Unmarried motherhood 1830-1990: Genealogical analysis. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data: A guide for analysis (pp. 267–310). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• De Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Kosnik, A., & Carrington, A. (2019). Fans of color, fandoms of color. Transformative Works and Cultures, 29. doi:10.3983/twc.2019.1783
   Google Scholar
• Derecho, A. (2006). Archontic literature: A definition, a history, and several theories of fan fiction. In K. Busse. & K. Hellekson (Eds.), Fanfiction and fan communities in the age of the internet (pp. 61–78). Jefferson, NC: McFarland.
   Google Scholar
• Dhaenens, F. (2013). Teenage queerness: Negotiating heteronormativity in the representation of gay teenagers in Glee. Journal of Youth Studies, 16(3), 304–317. doi:10.1080/13676261.2012.718435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doty, A. (1993). Making things perfectly queer: Interpreting mass culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dow, B. (2001). Ellen, television, and the politics of gay and lesbian visibility. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 18(2), 123–140. doi:10.1080/07393180128077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downing, G. (2013). Virtual youth: Non-heterosexual young people’s use of the internet to negotiate their identities and socio-sexual relations. Children’s Geographies, 11(1), 44–58. doi:10.1080/14733285.2013.743280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dym, B., Brubaker, J. R., Fiesler, C., & Semaan, B. (2019). “Coming out okay”: Community narratives for LGBTQ identity recovery work. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), 1–28. doi:10.1145/3359256
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dym, B., & Fiesler, C. (2018). Generations, migrations, and the future of fandom’s private spaces. Transformative Works and Cultures, 28. doi:10.3983/twc.2018.1583
   Google Scholar
• Ek, R. (2006). Media studies, geographical imaginations and relational space. In J. Falkheimer & A. Jansson (Eds.), Geographies of communication: The spatial turn in media studies (pp. 45–66). Göteborg, Sweden: Nordicom.
   Google Scholar
• Elden, S. (2001). Mapping the present: Heidegger, Foucault and the project of a spatial history. London, UK: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. R., & Mathur, A. (2005). The value of online surveys. Internet Research, 15(2), 195–219. doi:10.1108/10662240510590360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, J. (1987). Television culture. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Floegel, D. (2020). “Write the story you want to read”: World-queering through slash fanfiction creation. Journal of Documentation, 76(4), 785–805. doi:10.1108/JD-11-2019-0217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1970/2002). The order of things. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1972/2002). The archaeology of knowledge. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1978/1998). The history of sexuality (volume one): The will to knowledge. London, UK: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980a). Truth and power. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977 (pp. 109–133). New York: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980b). Two lectures. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977 (pp. 78–108). New York, NY: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1986). Of other spaces. Diacritics, 16(1), 22–27. doi:10.2307/464648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1989). Schizo-culture: Infantile sexuality. In S. Lotringer (Ed.), Foucault live: Collected interviews, 1961–1984 (pp. 154–167). New York, NY: Semiotext[e].
   Google Scholar
• Gonsiorek, J. C. (1993). Threat, stress and adjustment: Mental health and the workplace for gay and lesbian individuals. In L. Diamant (Ed.), Homosexual issues in the workplace (pp. 243–264). Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J., Sandvoss, C., & Harrrington, C. L. (2007). Introduction: Why study fans? In J. Gray, C. Sandvoss, & C. L. Harrington (Eds.), Fandom: Identities and communities in a mediated world (pp. 357–364). New York, NY: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, L. (2001). Up from invisibility: Lesbians, gay men, and the media in America. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. (2013). Introduction. In S. Hall, J. Evans, & S. Nixon. (Eds.), Representation (2nd ed., pp. xvii–xxvi). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hanmer, R. (2010). Internet fandom, queer discourse and identities. In C. Pullen & M. Cooper (Eds.), LGBT identity and online new media (pp. 147–158). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hanmer, R. (2014). “Xenasubtexttalk.” Feminist Media Studies, 14(4), 608–622. doi:10.1080/14680777.2012.754778
   Google Scholar
• Hayfield, N., & Huxley, C. (2015). Insider and outsider perspectives: Reflections on researcher identities in research with lesbian and bisexual women. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12(2), 91–106. doi:10.1080/14780887.2014.918224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckathorn, D. D. (1997). Respondent-driven sampling: A new approach to the study of hidden populations. Social Problems, 44(2), 174–199. doi:10.2307/3096941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, D. (2005). “I’m gay”: Declarations, desire, and coming out on prime-time television. Sexualities, 8(1), 7–29. doi:10.1177/1363460705049572
   Google Scholar
• Hills, M. (2005). Patterns of surprise: The ‘aleatory object’ in psychoanalytic ethnography and cyclical fandom. American Behavioral Scientist, 48(7), 801–821. doi:10.1177/0002764204273169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S., & Scott, S. (2004). Sexual antinomies in late modernity. Sexualities, 7(2), 241–256. doi:10.1177/1363460704042166
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. (1988). Star trek rerun, reread, rewritten: Fan writing as textual poaching. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 5(2), 85–107. doi:10.1080/15295038809366691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. (1992). Textual poachers, television fans and participatory culture. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. (1995). ‘Out of the closet and into the universe’: Queers and star trek. In J. Tulloch & H. Jenkins (Eds.), Science fiction audiences: Watching “doctor who” and “star trek” (pp. 237–265). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, P. (2013). The geographies of heterotopias. Geography Compass, 7(11), 790–803. doi:10.1111/gec3.12079
   Google Scholar
• Klein, K., Holtby, A., Cook, K., & Travers, R. (2015). Complicating the coming out narrative: Becoming oneself in a heterosexist and cissexist world. Journal of Homosexuality, 62(3), 297–326. doi:10.1080/00918369.2014.970829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamerichs, N. (2018). Productive fandom: Intermediality and affective reception in fan cultures. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. (2008). Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: Teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media and Society, 10(3), 392–411. doi:10.1177/1461444808089415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llewellyn, A., & Reynolds, K. (2021). Within and between heteronormativity and diversity: Narratives of LGB teachers and coming and being out in schools. Sex Education, 21(1), 13–26. doi:10.1080/14681811.2020.1749040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackey, M., & McClay, J. K. (2008). Pirates and poachers: Fan fiction and the conventions of reading and writing. English in Education, 42(2), 131–147. doi:10.1111/j.1754-8845.2008.00011.x
   Google Scholar
• McNamee, S. (2000). Foucault’s heterotopia and children’s everyday lives. Childhood, 7(4), 479–492. doi:10.1177/0907568200007004006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNicholas Smith, K., & Tyler, I. (2017). Lesbian brides: Post-queer popular culture. Feminist Media Studies, 17(3), 315–331. doi:10.1080/14680777.2017.1282883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, S., & Llewellyn, A. (2020). “It’s just the thing you do”: Physical and digital fields, and the flow of capital for young people’s gendered identity negotiation. Journal or Adolescent Research, 35(1), 84–110. doi:10.1177/0743558419883359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, M. (2000). Dante’s left foot kicks queer theory into gear. In S. Talburt & S. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Thinking queer: Sexuality, culture, and education (pp. 15–32). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Nadal, K. L., Issa, M. A., Leon, J., Meterko, V., Wideman, M., & Wong, Y. (2011). Sexual orientation microaggressions: “Death by a thousand cuts” for lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth. Journal of LGBT Youth, 8(3), 1–26. doi:10.1080/19361653.2011.584204
   Google Scholar
• Ng, E. (2008). Reading the romance of fan cultural production: Music videos of a television lesbian couple. Popular Communication, 6(2), 103–121. doi:10.1080/15405700701746525
   Google Scholar
• Ng, E. (2017). Between text, paratext, and context: Queerbaiting and the contemporary media landscape. Transformative Works and Cultures, 24. doi:10.3983/twc.2017.0917
   Google Scholar
• Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pande, R. (2018). Squee from the margins: Fandom and race. Iowa: University of Iowa Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettid, M. J. (2008). Cyberspace and a space for gays in South Korea. In T. R. Tangherlini & S. Yea (Eds.), Sitings: Critical approaches to Korean geography (pp. 173–185). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pullen, C. (2010). Introduction. In C. Pullen & M. Cooper (Eds.), LGBT identity and online new media (pp. 271–287). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pullen, C., & Cooper, M (Eds.). (2010). LGBT identity and online new media. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Radway, J. (1984). Reading the romance. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rambukkana, N. (2007). Is slash an alternative medium? “Queer” heterotopias and the role of autonomous media spaces in radical world building. Affinities: A Journal of Radical Theory, Culture and Action, 1(1), 69–85. https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/affinities/article/view/6164
   Google Scholar
• Rich, A. (1980). Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 5(4), 631–660. doi:10.1086/493756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rymarczuk, R., & Derksen, M. (2014). Different spaces: Exploring Facebook as heterotopia. First Monday, 19(6), 1–16. doi:10.5210/fm.v19i6.5006
   Google Scholar
• Seargeant, P., & Tagg, C. (2014). Introduction: The language of social media. In P. Seargeant & C. Tagg (Eds.), The language of social media: Identity and community on the internet (pp. 1–20). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. M. (1997). The good homosexual and the dangerous queer: Resisting the “new homophobia.” In L. Segal (Ed.), New sexual agendas (pp. 60–71). London, UK: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, L. (2015). Millenial fandom: Television audiences in the transmedia age. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. (2001). Locating and conducting discourse analytic research. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data: A guide for analysis (pp. 5–48). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, B. (2011). What is fanfiction and why are people saying such nice things about it?? Storyworlds: A Journal of Narrative Studies, 3, 1–24. doi:10.5250/storyworlds.3.2011.0001
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, E. E. (2019). The dark fantastic: Race and the imagination from Harry Potter to the hunger games. New York, NY: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tushnet, R. (2007). Copyright law, fan practices and the rights of the author. In J. Gray, C. Sandvoss, & C. L. Harrington (Eds.), Fandom: Identities and communities in a mediated world (pp. 357–364). New York, NY: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waggoner, E. B. (2018). Bury your gays and social media fan response: Television, LGBTQ representation, and communitarian ethics. Journal of Homosexuality, 65(13), 1877–1891. doi:10.1080/00918369.2017.1391015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, L. (2012). Nerdfighters, Paper Towns, and heterotopia. Transformative Works and Cultures, 10. doi:10.3983/twc.2012.0374
   Google Scholar
• Willig, C. (2014). Interpretation and analysis. In U. Flick, W. Scott, & K. Metzler (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 136–150). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Young, S. (1998). Of cyber spaces: The Internet & heterotopias. M/C: A Journal of Media and Culture, 1(4). http://journal.media-culture.org.au/9811/hetero.php
   Google Scholar