458
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Social Categorization of Sexual Orientation via Verbal Cues: Evidence From a “Who Said What?” Study

, MAORCID Icon & , PhDORCID Icon

References

  • Alaei, R., & Rule, N. O. (2016). Accuracy of perceiving social attributes. In J. A. Hall, M. S. Mast, & T. V. West (Eds.), The social psychology of perceiving others accurately (pp. 125–142). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ambady, N., Hallahan, M., & Conner, B. (1999). Accuracy of judgments of sexual orientation from thin slices of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(3), 538–547. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.538
  • Berger, G., Hank, L., Rauzi, T., & Simkins, L. (1987). Detection of sexual orientation by heterosexuals and homosexuals. Journal of Homosexuality, 13(4), 83–100. doi:10.1300/J082v13n04_05
  • Breen, A. B., & Karpinski, A. (2013). Implicit and explicit attitudes toward gay males and lesbians among heterosexual males and females. The Journal of Social Psychology, 153(3), 351–374. doi:10.1080/00224545.2012.739581
  • Brewer, G., & Lyons, M. (2016). Discrimination of sexual orientation: Accuracy and confidence. Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 260–264. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.11.019
  • Brewer, G., & Lyons, M. (2017). Is gaydar affected by attitudes toward homosexuality? Confidence, labeling bias, and accuracy. Journal of Homosexuality, 64(9), 1241–1252. doi:10.1080/00918369.2016.1244443
  • Connolly, J., & McIsaac, C. (2009). Adolescents’ explanations for romantic dissolutions: A developmental perspective. Journal of Adolescence, 32(5), 1209–1223. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2009.01.006
  • Delton, A. W., Cosmides, L., Guemo, M., Robertson, T. E., & Tooby, J. (2012). The psychosemantics of free riding: Dissecting the architecture of a moral concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1252. doi:10.1037/a0027026
  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146
  • Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1–74). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Hall, J. A. (1978). Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 845–857. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.85.4.845
  • Hall, J. A., Murphy, N. A., & Schmid Mast, M. (2006). Recall of nonverbal cues: Exploring a new definition of interpersonal sensitivity. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 30, 141–155. doi:10.1007/s10919-006-0013-3
  • Hall, J. A., & Schmid Mast, M. (2008). Are women always more interpersonally sensitive than men? Impact of goals and content domain. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 144–155. doi:10.1177/0146167207309192
  • Hudson, W. W., & Ricketts, W. A. (1980). A strategy for the measurement of homophobia. Journal of Homosexuality, 5(4), 357–372. doi:10.1300/J082v05n04_02
  • Johnson, K. L., & Ghavami, N. (2011). At the crossroads of conspicuous and concealable: What race categories communicate about sexual orientation. PLoS One, 6(3), e18025. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018025
  • Johnson, K. L., Gill, S., Reichman, V., & Tassinary, L. G. (2007). Swagger, sway, and sexuality: Judging sexual orientation from body motion and morphology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(3), 321. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.321
  • Kapucu, A., Kılıç, A., Özkılıç-Kartal, Y., & Sarıbaz, B. (2021). Turkish emotional word norms for arousal, valence and discrete emotion categories. Psychological Reports, 124(1), 188–209.
  • Kurzban, R., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2001). Can race be erased? Coalitional computation and social categorization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(26), 15387–15392. doi:10.1073/pnas.251541498
  • Lieberman, D., Oum, R., & Kurzban, R. (2008). The family of fundamental social categories includes kinship: Evidence from the memory confusion paradigm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(6), 998–1012. doi:10.1002/ejsp.528
  • Lyons, M., Lynch, A., Brewer, G., & Bruno, D. (2014). Detection of sexual orientation (“gaydar”) by homosexual and heterosexual women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43(2), 345–352. doi:10.1007/s10508-013-0144-7
  • Pietraszewski, D. (2018). A reanalysis of crossed-dimension “Who said what?” paradigm studies, using a better error base-rate correction. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(5), 479–489. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.04.005
  • Pietraszewski, D., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2014). The content of our cooperation, not the color of our skin: An alliance detection system regulates categorization by coalition and race, but not sex. PloS one, 9(2), e88534. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0088534
  • Pietraszewski, D., Curry, O. S., Petersen, M. B., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2015). Constituents of political cognition: Race, party politics, and the alliance detection system. Cognition, 140, 24–39. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.03.007
  • Remedios, J. D., Chasteen, A. L., Rule, N. O., & Plaks, J. E. (2011). Impressions at the intersection of ambiguous and obvious social categories: Does gay + Black = likable? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1312–1315. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.015
  • Rule, N. O. (2017). Perceptions of sexual orientation from minimal cues. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(1), 129–139. doi:10.1007/s10508-016-0779-2
  • Rule, N. O., & Alaei, R. (2016). “Gaydar” The perception of sexual orientation from subtle cues. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(6), 444–448. doi:10.1177/0963721416664403
  • Rule, N. O., & Ambady, N. (2008). Brief exposures: Male sexual orientation is accurately perceived at 50 ms. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(4), 1100–1105. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.12.001
  • Rule, N. O., Ambady, N., Adams, R. B., & Macrae, C. N. (2007). Us and them: Memory advantages in perceptually ambiguous groups. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(4), 687–692. doi:10.3758/BF03196822
  • Rule, N. O., Ambady, N., & Hallett, K. C. (2009a). Female sexual orientation is perceived accurately, rapidly, and automatically from the face and its features. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(6), 1245–1251. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.07.010
  • Rule, N. O., Garrett, J. V., & Ambady, N. (2010b). On the perception of religious group membership from faces. PloS one, 5(12), e14241. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0014241
  • Rule, N. O., Macrae, C. N., & Ambady, N. (2009b). Ambiguous group membership is extracted automatically from faces. Psychological Science, 20(4), 441–443. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02314.x
  • Rule, N. O., Rosen, K. S., Slepian, M. L., & Ambady, N. (2011b). Mating interest improves women’s accuracy in judging male sexual orientation. Psychological Science, 22(7), 881–886. doi:10.1177/0956797611412394
  • Rule, N. O., Tskhay, K. O., Brambilla, M., Riva, P., Andrzejewski, S. A., & Krendl, A. C. (2015). The relationship between anti-gay prejudice and the categorization of sexual orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 77, 74–80. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.12.038
  • Saribay, S. A., Biten, A. F., Meral, E. O., Aldan, P., Třebický, V., & Kleisner, K. (2018). The Bogazici face database: Standardized photographs of Turkish faces with supporting materials. PloS one, 13(2), e0192018. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0192018
  • Schmid Mast, M., & Hall, J. A. (2006). Women’s advantage at remembering others’ appearance: A systematic look at the why and when of a gender difference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 353–364. doi:10.1177/0146167205282150
  • Skorska, M. N., Geniole, S. N., Vrysen, B. M., McCormick, C. M., & Bogaert, A. F. (2015). Facial structure predicts sexual orientation in both men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(5), 1377–1394. doi:10.1007/s10508-014-0454-4
  • Sulpizio, S., Fasoli, F., Maass, A., Paladino, M. P., Vespignani, F., Eyssel, F., & Bentler, D. (2015). The sound of voice: Voice-based categorization of speakers’ sexual orientation within and across languages. PloS one, 10(7), e0128882. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0128882
  • Taylor, S., Fiske, S., Etcoff, N., & Ruderman, A. (1978). Categorical and contextual bases of person memory and stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 778–793. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.36.7.778
  • Tskhay, K. O., Feriozzo, M. M., & Rule, N. O. (2013). Facial features influence the categorization of female sexual orientation. Perception, 42, 1090–1094. doi:10.1068/p7575
  • Tskhay, K. O., & Rule, N. O. (2013). Accuracy in categorizing perceptually ambiguous groups: A review and meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 72–86. doi:10.1177/1088868312461308
  • Van Borsel, J., De Bruyn, E., Lefebvre, E., Sokoloff, A., De Ley, S., & Baudonck, N. (2009). The prevalence of lisping in gay men. Journal of Communication Disorders, 42, 100–106. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2008.08.004
  • van Leeuwen, F., Park, J. H., & Penton-Voak, I. S. (2012). Another fundamental social category? Spontaneous categorization of people who uphold or violate moral norms. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(6), 1385–1388. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.06.004
  • Walker, P., & Antaki, C. (1986). Sexual orientation as a basis for categorization in recall. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25(4), 337–339. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1986.tb00747.x

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.