Sounds Like There was No Sexual Orientation Discrimination? Attributions to Discrimination on the Basis of Auditory Gaydar

References

• Alt, N. P., Lick, D. J., & Johnson, K. L. (2020). The straight categorization bias: A motivated and altruistic reasoning account. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(6), 1266–1278. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, S. M. (2020). Gender matters: The perceived role of gender expression in discrimination against cisgender and transgender LGBQ individuals. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 44(3), 323–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684320929354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P., Levinson, S. C., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Vol. 4). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085
   Google Scholar
• Castle, R. (2012). The gay accent, gender, and title VII employment discrimination. Seattle University Law Review, 36, 1943–1966. https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article1⁄42191&context1⁄4sulr
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
   Google Scholar
• Crocker, J., Cornwell, B., & Major, B. (1993). The stigma of overweight: Affective consequences of attributional ambiguity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.1.60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crocker, J., Voelkl, K., Testa, M., & Major, B. (1991). Social stigma: The affective consequences of attributional ambiguity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(2), 218–228. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derwing, T. (2003). What do ESL students say about their accents? The Canadian Modern Language Review, 59(4), 547–567. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.59.4.547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, L., & Steinmetz, S. (2023). Sexual orientation, workplace authority and occupational segregation: Evidence from Germany. Work, Employment and Society, 09500170231158513. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170231158513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragojevic, M., Fasoli, F., Cramer, J., & Rakić, T. (2020). Toward a century of language attitudes research: Looking back and moving forward. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 40(1), 60–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X20966714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasoli, F., Dragojevic, M., Rakić, T., & Johnson, S. (2023). Voice matters: Social categorization and stereotyping of speakers based on sexual orientation and nationality categories. Language & Communication, 90, 114–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2023.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasoli, F., & Hegarty, P. (2020). A leader doesn’t sound lesbian! The impact of sexual orientation vocal cues on heterosexual persons’ first impression and hiring decision. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 44(2), 234–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684319891168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasoli, F., Hegarty, P., & Frost, D. M. (2021). Stigmatization of ‘gay‐sounding’ voices: The role of heterosexual, lesbian, and gay individuals’ essentialist beliefs. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(3), 826–850. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasoli, F., Hegarty, P., Maass, A., & Antonio, R. (2018). Who wants to sound straight? Sexual majority and minority stereotypes, beliefs and desires about auditory gaydar. Personality and Individual Differences, 130, 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.03.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasoli, F., & Maass, A. (2020). The social costs of sounding gay: Voice-based impressions of adoption applicants. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 39(1), 112–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X19883907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasoli, F., Maass, A., & Berghella, L. (2022). Who has a better auditory gaydar? Sexual orientation categorization by heterosexual and lesbian, gay and bisexual people. Journal of Homosexuality. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2021.2004796
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasoli, F., Maass, A., Paladino, M. P., & Sulpizio, S. (2017). Gay-and lesbian-sounding auditory cues elicit stereotyping and discrimination. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(5), 1261–1277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-0962-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasoli, F., Maass, A., & Sulpizio, S. (2016). Communication of the “invisible”: The case of sexual orientation. In H. Giles & A. Maass (Eds.), Advances in intergroup communication (pp. 193–204). Peter Lang Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Fasoli, F., Maass, A., & Sulpizio, S. (2018). Stereotypical disease inferences from gay/lesbian versus heterosexual voices. Journal of Homosexuality, 65(8), 990–1014. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2017.1364945
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fassinger, R. E., Shullman, S. L., & Stevenson, M. R. (2010). Toward an affirmative lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender leadership paradigm. The American Psychologist, 65(3), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Formanowicz, M., & Suitner, C. (2020). Sounding strange (r): Origins, consequences, and boundary conditions of sociophonetic discrimination. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 39(1), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X19884354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gluszek, A., & Dovidio, J. F. (2010). The way they speak: A social psychological perspective on the stigma of nonnative accents in communication. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(2), 214–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309359288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face interaction. Cox & Wyman.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what? Harvard university press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1bzfp1z
   Google Scholar
• Herek, G. M. (2007). Confronting sexual stigma and prejudice: Theory and practice. Journal of Social Issues, 63(4), 905–925. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00544.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herek, G. M., & McLemore, K. A. (2013). Sexual prejudice. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 309–333. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T. (1996). Activation: Accessibility, and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133–168). Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Holmberg, D., & Blair, K. L. (2016). Dynamics of perceived social network support for same‐sex versus mixed‐sex relationships. Personal Relationships, 23(1), 62–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyt, C. L., Aguilar, L., Kaiser, C. R., Blascovich, J., & Lee, K. (2007). The self-protective and undermining effects of attributional ambiguity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(6), 884–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inman, M. L., & Baron, R. S. (1996). Influence of prototypes on perceptions of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4), 727–739. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.727
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kachel, S., Radtke, A., Skuk, V. G., Zäske, R., Simpson, A. P., Steffens, M. C., & Lindsay, S. (2018). Investigating the common set of acoustic parameters in sexual orientation groups: A voice averaging approach. PloS One, 13(12), e0208686. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208686
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kachel, S., Steffens, M. C., Preuß, S., & Simpson, A. P. (2020). Gender (conformity) matters: Cross-dimensional and cross-modal associations in sexual orientation perception. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 39(1), 40–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X19883902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, K. R. (2003). Racism or sexism? Attributional ambiguity and simultaneous membership in multiple oppressed groups. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(2), 223–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01894.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, I. C., & Crawford, M. (2007). Lesbians and bisexual women in the eyes of scientific psychology. Feminism & Psychology, 17(1), 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353507073096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, I. C., & Crawford, M. (2012). Lesbians in empirical psychological research: A new perspective for the twenty-first century? Journal of Lesbian Studies, 16(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10894160.2011.557637
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lick, D. J., & Johnson, K. L. (2016). Straight until proven gay: A systematic bias toward straight categorizations in sexual orientation judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(6), 801–817. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mack, S., & Munson, B. (2012). The influence of/s/quality on ratings of men’s sexual orientation: Explicit and implicit measures of the ‘gay lisp’ stereotype. Journal of Phonetics, 40(1), 198–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masi, M., & Fasoli, F. (2022). When fluency matters: The interplay between categorization fluency and gender atypicality on gaydar judgments. Journal of Language and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X221111382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, A. E. (2018). Searching for gaydar: Blind spots in the study of sexual orientationperception. Psychology and Sexuality, 9(3), 188–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2018.1468353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moonwomon-Baird, B. (1997). Toward a study of lesbian speech. In A. Livia & K. Hall (Eds.), Queerly phrased. Language, gender and sexuality (pp. 202–213). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, M. A., & Morrison, T. G. (2003). Development and validation of a scale measuring modern prejudice toward gay men and lesbian women. Journal of Homosexuality, 43(2), 15–37. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v43n02_02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, M. A., & Morrison, T. G. (2003). Development and validation of a scale measuring modern prejudice toward gay men and lesbian women. Journal of Homosexuality, 43(2), 15–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Painter, D., Fasoli, F., & Sulpizio, S. (2021). The impact of stimuli length and analytic method on auditory ‘gaydar’ research. Journal of Voice. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.08.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palan, S., & Schitter, C. (2018). Prolific. ac—A subject pool for online experiments. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 17, 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2017.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pecoraro, D. (2020). Bridging privacy, face, and heteronormativity: Stories of coming out. Communication Studies, 71(4), 669–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2020.1776744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purdie-Vaughns, V., & Eibach, R. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59(5), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9424-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliff, J. J., Lassiter, G. D., Markman, K. D., & Snyder, C. J. (2006). Gender differences in attitudes toward gay men and lesbians: The role of motivation to respond without prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(10), 1325–1338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206290213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renn, K. A. (2007). LGBT student leaders and queer activists: Identities of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer identified college student leaders and activists. Journal of College Student Development, 48(3), 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2007.0029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, R. Q., Keum, B. T., Smith, L. C., Lu, Y., & Yee, S. (2023). The development and validation of the heterosexism erasure scale. The Counselling Psychologist, 51(1), 6–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/00110000221126997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, R. Q., Smith, L. C., Vernay, C. N., Welch, J. C., Sharma, R., & Eberhardt, M. (2021). Accessing counseling services where the rainbow doesn’t shine: A heterosexism audit study. Journal of Homosexuality, 68(13), 2246–2265. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2020.1734377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (2001). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, B., & Oakes, P. (2006). Beyond dependence: An identity approach to social power and domination. Human Relations, 59(1), 105–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726706062760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, M. L., Kleck, R. E., Strenta, A., & Mentzer, S. J. (1979). Avoidance of the handicapped: An attributional ambiguity analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(12), 2297–2306. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.12.2297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulpizio, S., Fasoli, F., Antonio, R., Eyssel, F., Paladino, M. P., & Diehl, C. (2020). Auditory gaydar: Perception of sexual orientation based on female voice. Language and Speech, 63(1), 184–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830919828201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulpizio, S., Fasoli, F., Maass, A., Paladino, M. P., Vespignani, F., Eyssel, F., & Bentler, D. (2015). The sound of voice: Voice-based categorization of speakers’ sexual orientation within and across languages. PLoS One, 10(7), e0128882. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128882
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, D. M., & Raadt, J. S. (2021). Gay-and straight-sounding auditory cues elicit stereotyping about teaching effectiveness. Journal of Research in Music Education, 69(1), 62–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429420948229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tskhay, K. O., & Rule, N. O. (2013). Accuracy in categorizing perceptually ambiguous groups: A review and meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17(1), 72–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868312461308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasilovsky, A. T. (2018). Aesthetic as genetic: The epistemological violence of gaydar research. Theory & Psychology, 28(3), 298–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354318764826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar