Improvement of Conflict Handling: Hand-Holding During and After Conflict Discussions Affects Heart Rate, Mood, and Observed Communication Behavior in Romantic Partners

References

• Bloch, L., Haase, C. M., & Levenson, R. W. (2014). Emotion regulation predicts marital satisfaction: More than a wives’ tale. Emotion, 14(1), 130–144. doi:10.1037/a0034272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1987). Application of hierarchical linear models to assessing change. Psychological Bulletin, 101 (1), 147–158. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J. K. (1991). Relational message interpretations of touch, conversational distance, and posture. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 15, 233–259. doi:10.1007/BF00986924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conradi, H. J., Noordhof, A., Boyette, L. L., & de Jonge, P. (2020). Physical distance between romantic partners as marker for attachment in couples: A proof of concept study. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 41(1), 91–106. doi: 10.1002/anzf.1398
   Google Scholar
• Conradi, H. J., Dingemanse, P., Noordhof, A., Finkenauer, C., & Kamphuis, J. H. (2017). Effectiveness of the ‘Hold me Tight’ relationship enhancement program in a self-referred and a clinician-referred sample: An emotionally focused couples therapy-based approach. Family Process, 57(3), 613–628. doi:10.1111/famp.12305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conty, L., George, N., & Hietanen, J. K. (2016). Watching eyes effects: When others meet the self. Consciousness and Cognition, 45, 184–197. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2016.08.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debrot, A., Schoebi, D., Perrez, M., & Horn, A. B. (2013). Touch as an interpersonal emotion regulation process in couples’ daily lives: The mediating role of psychological intimacy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1373–1385. doi:10.1177/0146167213497592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditzen, B., Hoppman, C., & Klumb, P. (2008). Positive couple interactions and daily cortisol: On the stress-protecting role of intimacy. Psychosomatic Medicine, 70, 883–889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditzen, B., Neumannc, I. D., Bodenmann, G., von Dawanse, B., Turnerf, R. A., Ehlerta, U., & Heinrichse, M. (2007). Effects of different kinds of couple interaction on cortisol and heart rate responses to stress in women. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 32, 565–574 doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2007.03.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditzen, B., Schaer, M., Gabriel, B., Bodenmann, G., Ehlert, U., & Heinrichs, M. (2009). Intranasal oxytocin increases positive communication and reduces cortisol levels during couple conflict. Biological Psychiatry, 62, 1187–1190. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.10.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erceau, D., & Guéguen, N. (2007). Tactile contact and evaluation of the toucher. The Journal of Social Psychology, 147(4), 441–444. doi:10.3200/SOCP.147.4.441-444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Essner, A., Sjöström, R., Ahlgren, E., & Lindmark, B. (2013). Validity and reliability of Polar® RS800CX heart rate monitor, measuring heart rate in dogs during standing position and at trot on a treadmill. Physiology & Behavior, 114–115, 1–5. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feingold, A. (2009). Effect sizes for growth-modeling analysis for controlled clinical trials in the same metric as for classical analysis. Psychological Methods, 14(1), 43–53. doi:10.1037/a0014699
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, R. (2012). Oxytocin and social affiliation in humans. Hormones and Behavior, 61, 380–391. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2012.01.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrer, E., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2003). Modeling affective processes in dyadic relations via dynamic factor analysis. Emotion, 3, 344–360. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.3.4.344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, T. (2010). Touch for socioemotional and physical well-being: A review. Developmental Review, 30, 367–383. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2011.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floyd, F. J. (2007). Communication Skills Test (CST) observational system for couples’ problem-solving skills. In P. K. Kerig & D. H. Baucom (Eds.), Couple observational coding systems (pp. 143–157). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., & Lindzey, G. (1998). The handbook of social psychology (4th ed. Vol. 1). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glynn, L. M., Christenfeld, N., & Gerin, W. (1999). Gender, social support, and cardiovascular responses to stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 61, 234–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottman, J. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gottman, J. M., & Levenson, R. W. (1988). The social psychophysiology of marriage. In P. Noller & M. A. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Perspectives on marital interaction (pp. 182–200). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Grewen, K. M., Anderson, B. J., Girdler, S. S., & Light, K. C. (2003). Warm partner contact is related to lower cardiovascular reactivity. Behavioral Medicine, 29, 123–130. doi:10.1080/08964280309596065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulledge, A. K., Gulledge, M. H., & Stahmann, R. F. (2003). Romantic physical affection types and relationship satisfaction. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 31, 233–242. doi:10.1080/01926180390201936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt-Lunstad, J., Birmingham, W. S., & Light, K. C. (2008). Influence of a “Warm Touch” support enhancement intervention among married couples on ambulatory blood pressure, oxytocin, alpha amylase, and cortisol. Psychosomatic Medicine, 70, 976–985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertenstein, M. J., Verkamp, J. M., Kerestes, A. M., Holmes, R. M. (2006). The communicative functions of touch in humans, nonhuman primates, and rats: A review and synthesis of the empirical research. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132(1), 5–94. doi:10.3200/MONO.132.1.5-94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hietanen, J. K. (2018). Affective eye contact: An integrative review. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1587. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakubiak, B. L., & Feeney, B. C. (2017). Affectionate touch to promote relational, psychological, and physical well-being in adulthood: A theoretical model and review of the research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 21(3), 228–252. doi:10.1177/1088868316650307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakubiak, B. L., & Feeney, B. C. (2019). Hand-in-hand combat: Affectionate touch promotes relational well-being and buffers stress during conflict. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(3), 431–446. doi:10.1177/0146167218788556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. M., Burgess Moser, M., Beckes, L., Smith, A., Dalgleish, T., Halchuk, R. … Coan, J. A. (2013). Soothing the threatened brain: Leveraging contact comfort with emotionally focused therapy. PLoS One, 8(11), e79314. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiecolt-Glaser, J., & Newton, T. (2001). Marriage and health: His and hers. Psychological Bulletin, 127(4), 472–503. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.4.472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., Newton, T., Cacioppo, J. T., MacCallum, R. C., Glaser, R., & Malarkey, W. B. (1996). Marital conflict and endocrine function: Are men really more physiologically affected than women? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64(2), 324–332. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.64.2.324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluwer, E. S., & Johnson, M. D. (2007). Conflict frequency and relationship quality across the transition to parenthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 1089–1106. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00434.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosfeld, M., Heinrichs, M., Zak, P. J., Fischbacher, U., & Fehr, E. (2005): Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature, 435, 673–676. doi:10.1038/nature03701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levenson, R. W., Haase, C. M., Bloch, L., Holley, S. R., & Seider, B. J. (2015). Emotion regulation in couples. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Light, K. C., Grewen, K. M., & Amico, J. A. (2005). More frequent partner hugs and higher oxytocin levels are linked to lower blood pressure and heart rate in premenopausal women. Biological Psychology, 69, 5–21. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas, C. J. M. & Hox J. J. (2005).  Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology, 1(3), 86–92. doi:10.1027/1614-2241.1.3.86.
   Google Scholar
• Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Jackson, B. (2001). Mediators of the gender difference in rumination. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 37–47. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.00005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porges, S. W. (2009). The polyvagal theory: New insights into adaptive reactions of the autonomic nervous system. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, 76, S86–S90. doi:10.3949/ccjm.76.s2.17
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pos, A. E., Greenberg, L. S., Goldman, R. N., & Korman, L. M. (2003). Emotional processing during experiential treatment of depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(6), 1007–1016. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.71.6.1007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randall, A. K., & Bodenmann, G. (2009). The role of stress on close relationships and marital satisfaction. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 105–115. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2008.10.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, K. J., Hoplock, L. B., & Cameron, J. J. (2015). When in doubt, reach out: Touch is a covert but effective mode of soliciting and providing social support. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 6, 831–839. doi:10.1177/1948550615584197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and other dyads. Journal of Marriage and Family, 38, 15–28. doi:10.2307/350547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhofstadt, L. L., Buysse, A., Ickes, W., De Clercq, A., & Peene, O. J. (2005). Conflict and support interactions in marriage: An analysis of couples’ interactive behavior and on-line cognition. Personal Relationships, 12(1), 23–42. doi:10.1111/j.1350-4126.2005.00100.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whisman, M. A., Beach, S. R. H., & Snyder, D. K. (2008). Is marital discord taxonic and can taxonic status be assessed reliably? Results from a national, representative sample of married couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 745–755. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.76.5.745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar