Power Distribution and Relationship Quality in Long-Term Heterosexual Couples

References

• Ackerman, R. A., Donnellan, M. B., & Kashy, D. A. (2011). Working with dyadic data in studies of emerging adulthood: Specific recommendations, general advice, and practical tips. In F. D. Fincham, M. Cui (Eds.), Romantic relationships in emerging adulthood (pp. 67–97). New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bentley, C.G., Galliher, R.V. & Ferguson, T.J. (2007). Associations among aspects of interpersonal power and relationship functioning in adolescent romantic couples. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 57(7–8), 483–495. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9280-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blood, R. O., Jr., & Wolfe, D. M. (1960). Husbands and wives: The dynamics of married living. Oxford, UK: Free Press Glencoe.
   Google Scholar
• Brezsnyak, M., & Whisman, M. A. (2004). Sexual desire and relationship functioning: The effects of marital satisfaction and power. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 30(3), 199–217. doi:10.1080/00926230490262393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan, A. D., Webster, G. D., & Mahaffey, A. L. (2011). The big, the rich, and the powerful: Physical, financial, and social dimensions of dominance in mating and attraction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(3), 365–382. doi:10.1177/0146167210395604
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J. K., & Hale, J. L. (1984). The fundamental topoi of relational communication. Communication Monographs, 51(3), 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/0363775840939. doi:10.1080/03637758409390195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buss, D. M. (1981). Sex differences in the evaluation and performance of dominant acts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(1), 147–154. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.40.1.147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buss, D. M., Gomes, M., Higgins, D. S., & Lauterbach, K. (1987). Tactics of manipulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1219. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B., Eber, H. W., & Tatsuoka, M. M. (1970). Handbook for the sixteen personality factors questionnaire (16 PF) in clinical, educational, industrial, and research psychology, for use with all forms of the test. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
   Google Scholar
• Centers, R., Raven, B. H., & Rodrigues, A. (1971). Conjugal power structure: A re-examination. American Sociological Review, 36(2), 264–278. doi:10.2307/2094043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, D. H., & Straus, M. A. (1986). Marital power, conflict, and violence in a nationally representative sample of American couples. Violence and Victims, 1(2), 141. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.1.2.141
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cromwell, R. E., & Olsen, D. H. (1975). Power in families. Oxford: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Dunbar, N. E., & Burgoon, J. K. (2005). Perceptions of power and interactional dominance in interpersonal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22(2), 207–233. doi:10.1177/0265407505050944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falbo, T., & Peplau, L. A. (1980). Power strategies in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(4), 618–628. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.38.4.618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, A. K., Simpson, J. A., & Rothman, A. J. (2015). The relationship power inventory: Development and validation. Personal Relationships, 22(3), 387–413. doi:10.1111/pere.12072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felmlee, D. H. (1994). Who’s on top? Power in romantic relationships. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research 31(5–6), 275–295. doi:10.1007/BF01544589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fodor, E. (2002). Gender and the experience of poverty in Eastern Europe and Russia after 1989. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 35, 369–382. . doi:10.1016/S0967-067X(02)00026-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, J. R., Raven, B., & Cartwright, D. (1959). The bases of social power. In J. M. Shafritz, S. Ott, Y. S. Jang (Eds.), Classics of organization theory (vol. 7, pp. 251–260). San Francisco, CA: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Frieze, I. H., & McHugh, M. C. (1992). Power and influence strategies in violent and nonviolent marriages. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16(4), 449–465. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1992.tb00268.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galliher, R. V., Rostosky, S. S., Welsh, D. P., & Kawaguchi, M. C. (1999). Power and psychological well-being in late adolescent romantic relationships. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 40(9–10), 689–710. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1018804617443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, D. L. (1971). Who has the power? The marital struggle. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 33(3), 445–458. doi:10.2307/349844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray-Little, B., Baucom, D. H., & Hamby, S. L. (1996). Marital power, marital adjustment, and therapy outcome. Journal of Family Psychology, 10(3), 292. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.10.3.292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez, A. M., Speizer, I. S., & Moracco, K. E. (2011). Linkages between gender equity and intimate partner violence among urban Brazilian youth. Journal of Adolescent Health, 49(4), 393–399. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.01.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havelková, H. (1993). ‘Patriarchy’ in Czech society. Hypatia, 8(4), 89–96. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.1993.tb00278.x
   Google Scholar
• Havlicek, J., Husarova, B., Rezacova, V., & Klapilova, K. (2011). Correlates of extra-dyadic sex in Czech heterosexual couples: Does sexual behavior of parents matter? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(6), 1153–1163. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9869-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, P. (1976). Women and power: Toward a theory of effectiveness. Journal of Social Issues, 32(3), 99–110. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1976.tb02599.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaura, S. A., & Allen, C. M. (2004). Dissatisfaction with relationship power and dating violence perpetration by men and women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(5), 576–588. doi:10.1177/0886260504262966
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110(2), 265. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., Cook, W. L., & Simpson, J. A. (2006). Dyadic data analysis (Methodology in the social sciences). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Kožený, J. & Ganický, P. (1976). ICL – Dotazník interpersonální diagnózy. Bratislava: Psychodiagnostické a didaktické testy.
   Google Scholar
• Leary, T. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality: A functional theory and methodology for personality evaluation. Eugene, OR: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, T. W., Wendorf, C. A., Imamoglu, E. O., Shen, J., Parkhill, M. R., Weisfeld, C. C., & Weisfeld, G. E. (2004). Marital satisfaction in four cultures as a function of homogamy, male dominance and female attractiveness. Sexualities, Evolution & Gender, 6(2–3), 97–130. doi:10.1080/14616660412331327518
   Google Scholar
• Mazur, A., & Booth, A. (1998). Testosterone and dominance in men. Behavioral and brain sciences, 21(3), 353–363. doi:10.1017/S0140525X98001228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, D. C. (1987). Human motivation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murstein, B. I., & Adler, E. R. (1995). Gender differences in power and self‐disclosure in dating and married couples. Personal Relationships, 2(3), 199–209. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.1995.tb00086.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peplau, L. A. (1979). Power in dating relationships. In J. Freeman (Ed.), Women: A feminist perspective (pp. 106–121). Mountainview, CA: Mayfield Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Peplau, L. A., & Campbell, S. M. (1989). The balance of power in dating and marriage. In Women: A feminist perspective (4th ed., pp. 121–137). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Ponzi, D., Klimczuk, A. C., Traficonte, D. M., & Maestripieri, D. (2015). Perceived dominance in young heterosexual couples in relation to sex, context, and frequency of arguing. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 9(1), 43–54. doi:10.1037/ebs0000031
   Google Scholar
• Pulerwitz, J., Gortmaker, S. L., & DeJong, W. (2000). Measuring sexual relationship power in HIV/STD research. Sex roles: A Journal of Research, 42(7–8), 637–660. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1007051506972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rollins, B. C., & Bahr, S. J. (1976). A theory of power relationships in marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38(4), 619–627. doi:10.2307/350682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadalla, E. K., Kenrick, D. T., & Vershure, B. (1987). Dominance and heterosexual attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(4), 730. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.4.730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shackelford, T. K., & Goetz, A. T. (2004). Men’s sexual coercion in intimate relationships: Development and initial validation of the Sexual Coercion in Intimate Relationships Scale. Violence and Victims, 19(5), 541. doi:10.1891/vivi.19.5.541.63681
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Šiklová, J. (1993). Are women in Central and Eastern Europe conservative? In N. Funk, M. Mueller (Eds.), Gender politics and post-communism: Reflections from Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union (pp. 74–83). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Šiklová, J. (1997). Feminism and the roots of apathy in the Czech Republic. Social Research, 62(2), 258–280.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, J. A., Farrell, A. K., Oriña, M. M., & Rothman, A. J. (2015). Power and social influence in relationships. In M. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver, J. A. Simpson, & J. F. Dovidio (Eds.), APA handbooks in psychology. APA handbook of personality and social psychology, Vol. 3. Interpersonal relations (pp. 393–420). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15–28. doi:10.2307/350547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (1997). The balance of power in romantic heterosexual couples over time from “his” and “her” perspectives. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 37(5–6), 361–379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1025601423031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. Oxford, UK: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vodochodský, I. (2007). Patriarchát na socialistický způsob: k genderovému řádu státního socialismu. (Patriarchy in a socialistic style: On the gender norm of state socialism). Gender, rovné příležitosti, výzkum (Gender, Equal Opportunities, Research), 2(8), 34–42.
   Google Scholar
• Wagnerová, A. (1995). Emancipace a vlastnictví: Příspěvek do diskuse o chybějících předpokladech pro vznik feminismu v předlistopadovém Československu (Emancipation and ownership: On the discussion of the lack conditions for the rise of feminism in pre-November Czechoslovakia). Sociologický Časopis (Czech Sociological Review), 31, 77–84.
   Google Scholar
• Weisfeld, G. E., Russell, R. J. H., Weisfeld, C. C., & Wells, P. A. (1992). Correlates of satisfaction in British marriages. Ethology and Sociobiology, 13(2), 125–145. doi:10.1016/0162-3095(92)90022-V
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whisman, M. A., & Jacobson, N. S. (1990). Power, marital satisfaction, and response to marital therapy. Journal of Family Psychology, 4(2), 202–212. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.4.2.202
   Google Scholar