Semiring and involution identities of powers of inverse semigroups

References

• Aceto, L., Ésik, Z., Ingólfsdóttir, A. (2003). The max-plus algebra of the natural numbers has no finite equational basis. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 293:169–188. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3975(02)00236-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida, J. (1995). Finite Semigroups and Universal Algebra. Series in Algebra, Vol. 3. Singapore: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Andréka, H., Mikulás, Sz. (2011). Axiomatizability of positive algebras of binary relations. Algebra Univers. 66:7–34. DOI: 10.1007/s00012-011-0142-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auinger, K., Dolinka, I., Volkov, M. V. (2012). Matrix identities involving multiplication and transposition. J. Eur. Math. Soc. 14:937–969. DOI: 10.4171/JEMS/323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burris, S., Sankappanavar, H. P. (1981). A Course in Universal Algebra. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, A. H. (1941). Semigroups admitting relative inverses. Ann. Math. 42(4):1037–1049. DOI: 10.2307/1968781.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, A. H., Preston, G. B. (1961). The Algebraic Theory of Semigroups, Vol. I. (Mathematical Survey No 7(I)). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Dolinka, I. (2007). A nonfinitely based finite semiring. Int. J. Algebra Comput. 17:1537–1551. DOI: 10.1142/S0218196707004177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolinka, I. (2009). A class of inherently nonfinitely based semirings. Algebra Univers. 60:19–35. DOI: 10.1007/s00012-008-2084-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolinka, I. (2009). A remark on nonfinitely based semirings. Semigroup Forum 78:368–373. DOI: 10.1007/s00233-008-9096-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolinka, I. (2009). The finite basis problem for endomorphism semirings of finite semilattices with zero. Algebra Univers. 61:441–448. DOI: 10.1007/s00012-009-0024-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunawardena, J., ed. Idempotency. Publications of the Newton Institute, Vol. 11. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gusev, S. V., Volkov, M. V. (2023). Semiring identities of finite inverse semigroups. Semigroup Forum 106:403–420. DOI: 10.1007/s00233-022-10336-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gusev, S. V., Volkov, M. V. (2023). Semiring and involution identities of power groups. J. Australian Math. Soc., DOI: 10.1017/S1446788722000374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, M. Jr. (1959). The Theory of Groups. New York: The Macmillan Company.
   Google Scholar
• Howie, J. M. (1995). Fundamentals of Semigroup Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, M., Ren, M., Zhao, X. (2022). Nonfinitely based ai-semirings with finitely based semigroup reducts. J. Algebra 611:211–245. DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2022.07.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ježek, J., Kepka, T., Maróti, M. (2009). The endomorphism semiring of a semilattice. Semigroup Forum 78:21–26. DOI: 10.1007/s00233-008-9045-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jipsen, P. (2017). Relation algebras, idempotent semirings and generalized bunched implication algebras. In: Höfner, P., Pous, D., Struth, G., eds. Relational and Algebraic Methods in Computer Science, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 10226. Cham: Springer, pp. 144–158.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E. W. H. (2023). Advances in the Theory of Varieties of Semigroups. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Litvinov, G. L., Maslov, V. P., eds. (2005). Idempotent Mathematics and Mathematical Physics. Contemporary Mathematics, Vol. 377. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Margolis, S. W. (1981). On M-varieties generated by power monoids. Semigroup Forum 22:339–353. DOI: 10.1007/BF02572813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, D. J., Hayes, D. L. (1973). Subgroups of the power semigroup of a group. J. Comb. Theory, Ser. A 14:173–186. DOI: 10.1016/0097-3165(73)90019-8.
   Google Scholar
• Petrich, M. (1984). Inverse Semigroups. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Pin, J.-É. (1980). Variétés de langages et monoïde des parties. Semigroup Forum 20:11–47, in French. DOI: 10.1007/BF02572667.
   Google Scholar
• Polák, L.: Syntactic semiring of a language. (2001). In: J. Sgall, A. Pultr, P. Kolman (eds.), Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science 2001, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 2136. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 611–620.
   Google Scholar
• Polák, L. (2003). Syntactic semiring and language equations. In: Champarnaud, J.-M., Maurel, D., eds. Implementation and Application of Automata 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 2608. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 182–193.
   Google Scholar
• Polák, L. (2003). Syntactic semiring and universal automaton. In: Ésik, Z., Fülöp, Z., eds. Developments in Language Theory 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 2710. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 411–422.
   Google Scholar
• Polák, L. (2004). A classification of rational languages by semilattice-ordered monoids. Arch. Math. (Brno) 40: 395–406.
   Google Scholar
• Putcha, M. (1979). Subgroups of the power semigroup of a finite semigroup. Can. J. Math. 31:1077–1083. DOI: 10.4153/CJM-1979-099-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren, M., Jackson, M., Zhao, X., Lei, D. (2023). Flat extensions of groups and limit varieties of additively idempotent semirings. J. Algebra 623:64–85. DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2023.01.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, J., Steinberg, B. (2009). The q-theory of Finite Semigroups. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Volkov, M. V. (2021). Semiring identities of the Brandt monoid. Algebra Univers. 82:Article no. 42. DOI: 10.1007/s00012-021-00731-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y., Ren, M., Zhao, X. (2023). The additively idempotent semiring S70 is nonfinitely based. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2308.03101
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Y., Zhao, X., Ren, M. (2023). On varieties of flat nil-semirings. Semigroup Forum 106:271–284. DOI: 10.1007/s00233-023-10337-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar