870
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Features

Skirting Around Critical Feminist Rationales for Teaching Women in Social Studies

REFERENCES

  • Alpern, M. (1978). Images of women in European history. Social Education,42, 220–227.
  • Bajaj, V. (2013, October 12). The striking absence of women. The New York Times, SR10.
  • Baker, J. (2005). The politics of choice: Difficult freedoms for young women in later modernity (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, England.
  • Bernard-Powers, J. (1996). Engendering social studies: Perspectives, texts, and teaching. Theory & Research in Social Education,24(1), 2–7. doi:10.1080/00933104.1996.10505766
  • Carter, C. (2011). Raise up your cloth! The woman suffrage movement’s second generation. Middle Level Learning,40, M2–M7.
  • Crocco, M. S. (2004). Women and the social studies: The long rise and rapid fall of feminist activity in the National Council of the Social Studies. In C. Woyshner, J. Watras, & M. S. Crocco (Eds.), Social education in the 20th century (pp. 142–159). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • Crocco, M. S. (2006a). Caught between invisibility and stereotyping: Teaching the novel “Shabanu.” Social Education,70, 178–182.
  • Crocco, M. S. (2006b). Gender and social education: What’s the problem? In E. W. Ross (Ed.), The social studies curriculum: Purposes and possibilities (3rd ed., pp. 171–193). Albany: SUNY Press.
  • Crocco, M. S. (2006c). The invisible hand of theory in social studies education. In A. Segall, E. Heilman, & C. Cherryholmes (Eds.), Social studies: The next generation (pp. 231–236). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • Crocco, M. S. (2007). Speaking truth to power: Women’s rights as human rights. The Social Studies,98, 257–269. doi:10.3200/TSSS.98.6.257-269
  • Crocco, M. S. (2008). Gender and sexuality in the social studies. In L. S. Levstik & C. A. Tyson (Eds.), Handbook of research in social studies education (pp. 172–196). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Crocco, M. S., & Cramer, J. (2005). Women, webquests, and controversial issues in the social studies. Social Education,69, 143–149.
  • Davies, B. (2003). Frogs and snails and feminist tales: Preschool children and gender. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
  • DeLeon, A. (2010). Introduction. In A. DeLeon & E. W. Ross (Eds.), Critical theories, radical pedagogies, and social education: New perspectives for social studies education (pp. ix–xvi). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
  • Dillabough, J., McLeod, J., & Mills, M. (2008). In search of allies and others: ‘Troubling’ gender and education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education,29, 301–310.
  • Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (1992). Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology,21, 461–490. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.002333
  • Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London, England: Routledge.
  • Foucault, M. (1977). Language, counter-memory, practice, trans. Donald F. Bouchard and Sherry Simon. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Foucault, M. (2007). What is critique? In S. Lotringer & L. Hochroth (Eds.), The politics of truth (2nd ed., pp. 41–82). New York, NY: Semiotext(e).
  • Grant, C., & Wieczorek, K. (2000). Teacher education and knowledge in ’the knowledge society’: The need for social moorings in our multicultural schools. Teachers College Record,102, 913–935. doi:10.1111/0161-4681.00084
  • Greenhouse, E. (2013, August 1). Twitter’s free-speech problem. The New Yorker. Retrieved from http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/elements/2013/08/how-free-should-speech-be-on-twitter.html
  • Guerrera, F. (2013, December 16). Wall Street lags on women’s roles. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304173704579261931042730484
  • Hahn, C. L. (1975). Eliminating sexism from the schools: An application of planned change. Social Education,39, 133–136.
  • Hahn, C. L., Bernard-Powers, J., Crocco, M. S., & Woyshner, C. (2007). Gender equity in social studies. In S. S. Klein (Ed.), Handbook for achieving gender equity through education (2nd ed., pp. 335–357). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Hahn, C. L. Bernard-Powers, J., Hunter, L., Groves, S., MacGregor, M., & Scott, K. (1985). Sex equity in social studies. In S. S. Klein (Ed.), Handbook for achieving sex equity through education (pp. 280–297). Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University.
  • Harvey, D. (2007). A brief history of neoliberalism (2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Henry, A. (2004). Not my mother’s sister: Generational conflict and third wave feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Hickey, M., & Kolterman, D. (2006). Special women in my life: Strategies for writing women into the social studies curriculum. Social Education,70, 190–196.
  • Hicks, S., & Taylor, C. (2008). A complex terrain of words and deeds: Discourse, research, and social change. In P. Cox, T. Geisen, & R. Green (Eds.), Qualitative research and social change (pp. 52–73). Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Kohl, H. (2007). She would not be moved: How we tell the story of Rosa Parks and the Montgomery Bus Boycott. New York, NY: New Press.
  • Kohlmeier, J. (2004). Experiencing world history through the eyes of ordinary women. Social Education,68, 470–478.
  • Kumashiro, K. (2001). “Posts” perspectives on anti-oppressive education in social studies, English, Mathematics, and science classrooms. Educational Researcher,30(3), 3–12. doi:10.3102/0013189X030003003
  • Ladson-Billings, G. (2003). Lies my teacher still tells: Developing a critical race perspective toward the social studies. In G. Ladson-Billings (Ed.), Critical race theory perspectives on social studies: The profession, policies, and curriculum (pp. 1–11). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
  • Landorf, H., & Pagan, L. (2005). Unveiling the hijab. The Social Studies,96, 171–177. doi:10.3200/TSSS.96.4.171-177
  • Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy within the postmodern. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Levstik, L. S. (1997/1998). Early adolescents’ understanding of the historical significance of women’s rights. International Journal of Social Education, 12(2), 19–34.
  • Levstik, L. S. (2000). Articulating the silences: Teachers’ and adolescents’ conceptions of historical significance. In P. Stearns, P. Seixas, & S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching, & learning history (pp. 284–305). New York: New York University.
  • Levstik, L. S. (2001). Daily acts of ordinary courage: Gender-equitable practice in the social studies classroom. In P. O’Reilly, E. M. Penn, & K. B. DeMarrais (Eds.), Educating young adolescent girls (pp. 189–211). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Levstik, L. S., & Groth, J. (2002). “Scary thing, being an eighth grader:” Exploring gender and sexuality in a middle school U.S. history unit. Theory & Research in Social Education,30, 233–254. doi:10.1080/00933104.2002.10473193
  • MacLure, M. (2003). Discourse in educational and social research. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
  • Maher, F. (1987). Inquiry teaching and feminist pedagogy. Social Education,51, 186–192.
  • Mohanty, C., Russo, A., & Torres, L. (Eds.). (1991). Third world women and the politics of feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  • Monaghan, M. (2014). Gender equity and education: Examining preservice teachers perceptions. Gender, Education, Music, and Society,7(8), 4–12.
  • Morago, C., & Anzaldúa, G. (Eds.). (2002). This bridge called my back. Berkeley, CA: Third Woman.
  • Potter, L. (2002). A bill to relieve certain legal disabilities of women. Social Education,66, 117–120.
  • Quinn, J., & Radtke, H. L. (2006). Dilemmatic negotiations: The (un)tenability of feminist identity. Psychology of Women Quarterly,30, 187–198. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00281.x
  • Rich, E. (2005). Young women, feminist identities, and neo-liberalism. Women’s Studies International Forum,28, 495–508. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2005.09.006
  • Richburg, R., Nelson, B., & Tochterman, S. (2002). Gender inequity: A world geography lesson plan. The Social Studies,93(1), 23–30. doi:10.1080/00377990209599876
  • Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ruby, T. (2006). Listening to the voices of hijab. Women’s Studies International Forum,29(1), 54–66. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2005.10.006
  • Sarkeesian, A. (2012, December 1). Anita Sarkeesian: Sexist online harassment and cyber mobs [video file]. Retrieved from http://tedxtalks.ted.com/video/Anita-Sarkeesian-at-TEDxWomen-2
  • Schmeichel, M. (2011). Feminism, neoliberalism, and social studies. Theory & Research in Social Education,39(1), 6–31. doi:10.1080/00933104.2011.10473445
  • Schmidt, S. (2012). Am I a woman? The normalisation of woman in US history. Gender and Education,24, 707–724. doi:10.1080/09540253.2012.674491
  • Segall, A. (2004). Social studies and the discourses of postmodernity. In C. Woyshner, J. Watras, & M. S. Crocco (Eds.), Social education in the twentieth century (pp. 160–175). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  • Segall, A. (2013). Revitalizing critical discourses in social education: Opportunities for a more complexified (un)knowing. Theory & Research in Social Education,41, 476–493. doi:10.1080/00933104.2013.836382
  • Sincero, P., & Woyshner, C. (2003). Writing women into the curriculum. Social Education,67, 218–225.
  • Stone, L. (1996). Feminist political theory: Contributions to a conception of citizenship. Theory & Research in Social Education,24(1), 36–53. doi:10.1080/00933104.1996.10505768
  • Tea, M. (Ed.). (2003). Without a net: The female experience of growing up working class. Emberville, CA: Seal.
  • Tetreault, M. K. T. (1987). Women, gender, and the social studies. Social Education,51, 167–168.
  • Tomlinson, B. (2010). Feminism and affect at the scene of the argument: Beyond the trope of the angry feminist. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
  • Trecker, J. (1971). Women in United States History high school textbooks. Social Education,35, 248–335.
  • Walker, R. (1992). Becoming the third wave. Ms,2(4), 39–42.
  • Weedon, C. (1987). Feminist practice and poststructural theory. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
  • Wetherell, M. (2001). Themes in discourse research: The case of Diana. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse theory and practice: A reader (pp. 14–28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.